<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>
			
			
				
			
			Health Improvement and Innovation Resource Centre
		</title>
		<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://www.hiirc.org.nz/site.rss
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<language>en</language>
		<copyright>2009-2018 hiirc.org.nz</copyright>
		
		
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of adding pharmacists to primary care teams to reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with Type 2 diabetes: Results from a randomized controlled trial (Canada)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/57960/cost-effectiveness-analysis-of-adding-pharmacists/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/57960/cost-effectiveness-analysis-of-adding-pharmacists/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<div id="dme12692-sec-0001" class="section">
<div class="para">
<p>The authors report that "adding pharmacists to primary care teams significantly improved blood pressure control and reduced predicted 10&ndash;year cardiovascular risk in patients with Type&nbsp;2 diabetes". In this analysis, they evaluated the economic implications of the strategy.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="dme12692-sec-0002">
<p>The authors conclude from the results of their analysis that "...&nbsp;adding pharmacists to primary care teams was a cost-effective strategy for reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with Type&nbsp;2 diabetes. In most circumstances, this intervention may also be cost saving".</p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:</span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.12692" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1111/dme.12692</span></a><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>
<p><span class="journalTitle">Simpson, S.H., et al. (2015). Cost-effectiveness analysis of adding pharmacists to primary care teams to reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with Type 2 diabetes: Results from a randomized controlled trial.&nbsp;<em>Diabetic Medicine,</em></span><em>&nbsp;<span class="vol">32</span></em><span>,&nbsp;</span><span class="pageFirst">899</span><span>&ndash;</span><span class="pageLast">906</span></p>
</div>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-06-26 12:17:27.35</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost-effectiveness of the New Zealand diabetes in pregnancy guideline screening recommendations</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/57917/cost-effectiveness-of-the-new-zealand-diabetes/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/57917/cost-effectiveness-of-the-new-zealand-diabetes/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-06-25 09:08:25.02</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Statistical and policy analysis of large-scale public health interventions</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/57841/statistical-and-policy-analysis-of-large/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/57841/statistical-and-policy-analysis-of-large/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-06-23 10:14:56.282</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>An analysis of cost savings estimates in health funding proposals</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54488/an-analysis-of-cost-savings-estimates-in/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54488/an-analysis-of-cost-savings-estimates-in/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-03-24 08:56:01.804</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Economic evaluation of prostate cancer screening: A systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/53409/economic-evaluation-of-prostate-cancer-screening/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/53409/economic-evaluation-of-prostate-cancer-screening/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-02-16 13:21:58.602</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>How and why researchers use the number needed to vaccinate to inform decision making — A systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/53380/how-and-why-researchers-use-the-number-needed/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/53380/how-and-why-researchers-use-the-number-needed/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The number needed to vaccinate (NNV) is a measure that has been widely used in the scientific literature to draw conclusions about the usefulness and cost-effectiveness of various immunisation programmes. The main objective of this review is to examine how and why the NNV has been used and reported in the published literature.</p>
<p>The authors identified 27 studies, the designs including observational studies, economic analyses, systematic reviews, and commentaries. The NNV has been used in the literature to describe three main themes: potential benefits of vaccination programmes, cost-effectiveness, and economic analyses, and modelling studies to compare different vaccination strategies.</p>
<p>Conclusions:&nbsp;NNV has been used in a wide variety of ways in the literature, yet there are no defined thresholds for what is a favourable NNV. Furthermore, the generalizability of the NNV is usually limited. Further work is required to determine the most appropriate use of this measure.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and can be read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.033" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.033</a></p>
<p>Hashim, A., et al. (2015).&nbsp;How and why researchers use the number needed to vaccinate to inform decision making&mdash;A systematic review.&nbsp;<em>Vaccine, 33(</em>6),&nbsp;753&ndash;758.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-02-13 11:56:01.733</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The impact of nurse practitioner services on cost, quality of care, satisfaction and waiting times in the emergency department- a systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48897/the-impact-of-nurse-practitioner-services/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48897/the-impact-of-nurse-practitioner-services/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>In this systematic review, the authors investigate the impact of nurse practitioner services on cost, quality of care, satisfaction and waiting times in the emergency department for adult patients.</p>
<p>Fourteen papers included and a narrative synthesis was undertaken. The authors find that "... emergency nurse practitioner service has a positive impact on quality of care, patient satisfaction and waiting times. There was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions regarding outcomes of a cost benefit analysis".</p>
<p>Now available to read in free full text at: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.07.006" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.07.006</a>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Jennings, N., et al. (2015).&nbsp;The impact of nurse practitioner services on cost, quality of care, satisfaction and waiting times in the emergency department- a systematic review. <em>International Journal of Nursing Studies,&nbsp;52</em>(1), 421&ndash;435.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-02-06 11:37:34.056</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Comparison of two dose and three dose human papillomavirus vaccine schedules: Cost effectiveness analysis based on transmission model (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52558/comparison-of-two-dose-and-three-dose-human/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52558/comparison-of-two-dose-and-three-dose-human/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>In this UK study, the authors investigate the incremental cost effectiveness of two dose human papillomavirus vaccination and of additionally giving a third dose.</p>
<p>Two dose schedules for bivalent or quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccines were assumed to provide 10, 20, or 30 years&rsquo; vaccine type protection and cross protection or lifelong vaccine type protection without cross protection. Three dose schedules were assumed to give lifelong vaccine type and cross protection.</p>
<p>Interventions: &nbsp;No, two, or three doses of human papillomavirus vaccine given routinely to 12 year old girls, with an initial catch-up campaign to 18 years.</p>
<p>The authors found that giving at least two doses of vaccine seemed to be "... highly cost effective across the entire range of scenarios considered at the quadrivalent vaccine list price of &pound;86.50 (&euro;109.23; $136.00) per dose. If two doses give only 10 years&rsquo; protection but adding a third dose extends this to lifetime protection, then the third dose also seems to be cost effective at &pound;86.50 per dose (median incremental cost effectiveness ratio &pound;17&thinsp;000, interquartile range &pound;11&thinsp;700-&pound;25&thinsp;800). If two doses protect for more than 20 years, then the third dose will have to be priced substantially lower (median threshold price &pound;31, interquartile range &pound;28-&pound;35) to be cost effective. Results are similar for a bivalent vaccine priced at &pound;80.50 per dose and when the same scenarios are explored by parameterising a Canadian model (HPV-ADVISE) with economic data from the United Kingdom".</p>
<p>The authors conclude that two dose human papillomavirus vaccine schedules are likely to be the most cost effective option provided protection lasts for at least 20 years. As the precise duration of two dose schedules may not be known for decades, cohorts given two doses should be closely monitored.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and is available to read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.g7584" target="_blank">http://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.g7584</a></p>
<p>Jit, M., et al. (2015).&nbsp;Comparison of two dose and three dose human papillomavirus vaccine schedules: Cost effectiveness analysis based on transmission model. <em>BMJ,&nbsp;</em><span><em>350</em>:g7584.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-01-08 12:45:47.863</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A cost-effectiveness analysis of the first federally funded antismoking campaign - Tips From Former Smokers (U.S.)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52132/a-cost-effectiveness-analysis-of-the-first/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52132/a-cost-effectiveness-analysis-of-the-first/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>In 2012, CDC launched the first federally funded national mass media antismoking campaign, Tips From Former Smokers (Tips), which resulted in a 12% relative increase in population-level quit attempts.</p>
<p>In this cost effectiveness analysis, the authors find that Tips saved about 179,099 <span>quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) "...&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;and prevented 17,109 premature deaths in the U.S. With the campaign cost of roughly $48 million, Tips spent approximately $480 per quitter, $2,819 per premature death averted, $393 per LY saved, and $268 per QALY gained". They conclude that Tips was&nbsp;highly cost-effective.</p>
<p>This article is available to read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.011" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.011</a></p>
<p>Xu, X., et al. (2015).&nbsp;A cost-effectiveness analysis of the first federally funded antismoking campaign.&nbsp;<em>American Journal of Preventive Medicine</em>&nbsp;48(3), 318&ndash;325</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-11 16:07:37.87</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of clinical nurse specialists in outpatient roles: A systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50765/the-effectiveness-and-cost-effectiveness/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50765/the-effectiveness-and-cost-effectiveness/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluated the cost-effectiveness of <span>clinical nurse specialists (CNSs)&nbsp;</span>delivering outpatient care in alternative or complementary provider roles.</p>
<p>Eleven <span>randomised controlled trials were included:&nbsp;</span>four evaluated alternative provider (n=683 participants) and seven evaluated complementary provider roles (n=1464 participants). Based on the results of their analysis, the authors conclude that "low-to-moderate quality evidence supports the effectiveness and two fair-to-high quality economic analyses support the cost-effectiveness of outpatient alternative provider CNSs. Low-to-moderate quality evidence supports the effectiveness of outpatient complementary provider CNSs; however, robust economic evaluations are needed to address cost-effectiveness".</p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.12219" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1111/jep.12219</span></a><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>
<p><span>Kilpatrick, K., Kaasalainen, S., Donald, F., Reid, K., Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., Martin-Misener, R., Harbman, P., Marshall, D. A., Charbonneau-Smith, R. and DiCenso, A. (2014). The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of clinical nurse specialists in outpatient roles: A systematic review. <em>Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice,&nbsp;20</em>(6), 1106&ndash;1123</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-10-20 09:28:51.315</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost-effectiveness of a quality improvement programme to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units in the USA</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50286/cost-effectiveness-of-a-quality-improvement/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50286/cost-effectiveness-of-a-quality-improvement/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The authors undertook a cost-effectiveness analysis of a multifaceted quality improvement programme (Keystone ICU)&nbsp;focused on reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units.</p>
<p><span>Over 1200 US hospitals are currently participating in&nbsp;<span>Keystone ICU.&nbsp;<span>This paper examines the cost changes and cost-effectiveness of the Keystone ICU project from the perspective of the hospital, <span>using a decision tree model to address the choice faced at an individual hospital about implementing the programme) and&nbsp;</span>nationally representative data sources.</span></span></span></p>
<p>The authors found that, this&nbsp;programme, as it is currently implemented by hospitals on an increasingly large scale in the USA, likely reduces the economic costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections for US hospitals. Awareness among hospitals about the programme's benefits should enhance implementation. The programme's implementation has the potential to substantially reduce morbidity, mortality and economic costs associated with central line-associated bloodstream infections.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and can be read in full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006065" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006065</span></a></p>
<p>Herzer, K.R., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Cost-effectiveness of a quality improvement programme to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units in the USA. <em>BMJ Open,&nbsp;4</em>, e006065.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-09-30 08:48:25.42</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost-effectiveness of telecare for people with social care needs: The Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49731/cost-effectiveness-of-telecare-for-people/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49731/cost-effectiveness-of-telecare-for-people/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The aim of this <span>pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial with nested economic evaluation was</span>&nbsp;to examine the costs and cost-effectiveness of &lsquo;second-generation&rsquo; telecare, in addition to standard support and care that could include &lsquo;first-generation&rsquo; forms of telecare, compared with standard support and care that could include &lsquo;first-generation&rsquo; forms of telecare.</p>
<p>A total of 2,600 people with social care needs participated in a trial of community-based telecare in three English local authority areas. In the Whole Systems Demonstrator Telecare Questionnaire Study, 550 participants were randomised to intervention and 639 to control. Participants who were offered the telecare intervention received a package of equipment and monitoring services for 12 months, additional to their standard health and social care services. The control group received usual health and social care.</p>
<p>The cost per additional <span>quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained</span>&nbsp;was &pound;297,000. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves indicated that the probability of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay of &pound;30,000 per QALY gained was only 16%. Sensitivity analyses combining variations in equipment price and support cost parameters yielded a cost-effectiveness ratio of &pound;161,000 per QALY.</p>
<p>The authors note that, while QALY gain in the intervention group was similar to that for controls, social and health services costs were higher. They conclude that second-generation telecare did not appear to be a cost-effective addition to usual care, assuming a commonly accepted willingness to pay for QALYs.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and can be read in full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afu067" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1093/ageing/afu067</span></a></p>
<p>Henderson, C., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Cost-effectiveness of telecare for people with social care needs: the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. <em>Age and Ageing,&nbsp;43</em>(6), 794-800.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-09-08 08:51:39.957</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Economics of mass media health campaigns with health-related product distribution: A Community Guide systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49279/economics-of-mass-media-health-campaigns/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49279/economics-of-mass-media-health-campaigns/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>In this systematic review, the authors investigate the costs, benefits, and overall&nbsp;economic value of communication campaigns that included mass media and distribution of&nbsp;specified health-related products at reduced price or free of charge.</p>
<p>Fifteen evaluation studies were included,&nbsp;involving campaigns promoting the use of child car seats or booster seats, pedometers,&nbsp;condoms, recreational safety helmets, and nicotine replacement therapy.</p>
<p>The economic merits of interventions could not be determined for health&nbsp;communication campaigns associated with use of recreational helmets, child car seats, and&nbsp;pedometers. The authors found&nbsp;&nbsp;some evidence that "... campaigns with free condom distribution to promote safer sex practices&nbsp;were cost-effective among high-risk populations and the cost per quit achieved in campaigns&nbsp;promoting tobacco cessation with nicotine replacement therapy products may translate to a cost per&nbsp;quality-adjusted life-year less than $50,000".</p>
<p><span>Available in full text at:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.thecommunityguide.org/news/2012/HealthCommunicationCampaigns.html" target="_blank">http://www.thecommunityguide.org/news/2012/HealthCommunicationCampaigns.html</a></p>
<p>Jacob, V., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Economics of mass media health campaigns with health-related product distribution: A Community Guide systematic review.&nbsp;<em>American Journal of Preventive&nbsp;Medicine, 4</em>7(3), 348-359.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-08-20 13:12:27.315</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial) (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48945/telephone-triage-for-management-of-same-day/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48945/telephone-triage-for-management-of-same-day/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>In this pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation, the&nbsp;</span>authors aimed to assess the effectiveness and cost consequences of general practitioner-(GP)-led and nurse-led telephone triage compared with usual care for patients seeking same-day consultations in primary care.</p>
<p>The study was undertaken between March 1, 2011, and March 31, 2013, at 42 practices in four centres in the UK. Forty-two&nbsp;practices were randomly assigned to GP triage (n=13), nurse triage (n=15), or usual care (n=14), and 20 990 patients (n=6695 vs 7012 vs 7283) were randomly assigned, of whom 16 211 provided primary outcome data.</p>
<p>GP triage was associated with a 33% increase in the mean number of contacts per person over 28 days compared with usual care, and nurse triage with a 48% increase. Although triage interventions were associated with increased contacts, estimated costs over 28 days were similar between all three groups.</p>
<p>The authors conclude that telephone triage might be useful in aiding the delivery of primary care. They note that the whole-system implications should be assessed when introduction of such a system is considered.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and can be read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(14)61058-8/fulltext" target="_blank">http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(14)61058-8/fulltext</a></p>
<p>Campbell, J.L., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial): A cluster-randomised controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis. <em>The Lancet,&nbsp;384</em>(9957), 1859 - 1868.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-08-05 13:10:00.402</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>An evaluation of the quality of evidence underpinning diabetes management models: A review of the literature (Australia)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48937/an-evaluation-of-the-quality-of-evidence/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48937/an-evaluation-of-the-quality-of-evidence/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The authors evaluate the quality of evidence on diabetes primary care workforce models in Australia.</p>
<p>"Of the 14 studies found, four were randomised controlled trials and one was a systematic review ... Only three provided a replicable protocol or detailed intervention delivery. Eleven lacked a theoretical framework. Twelve reported significant improvements in clinical (patient) outcomes ...; only four reported changes in short- and long-term outcomes (e.g. quality of life). Most studies used a small or targeted population. Only two studies assessed both benefits and costs of their intervention compared with usual care and cost effectiveness".</p>
<p>The authors conclude that more rigorous studies of diabetes workforce models are needed.</p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AH14018" target="_blank"><span>http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AH14018</span></a></span><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>
<p>Schofield, D., et al. (2014).&nbsp;An evaluation of the quality of evidence underpinning diabetes management models: A review of the literature.&nbsp;<em>Australian Health Review, 38</em>(5),&nbsp;495-505.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-08-05 08:49:43.22</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for parents deciding about MMR vaccination: A three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48872/cost-effectiveness-of-a-web-based-decision/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48872/cost-effectiveness-of-a-web-based-decision/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>In this evaluation, the authors&nbsp;assess the cost effectiveness of a web-based decision aid to increase uptake of the MMR vaccine that was being tested in a cluster randomised-controlled trial in urban GP practices in the north of England. Parents received the&nbsp;decision aid, a leaflet, or usual practice.</p>
<p>The authors conclude from their analysis that the decision aid had a "... high chance of being cost effective, regardless of the value placed on obtaining additional vaccinations. It also appears to offer an efficient means of decision support for parents".</p>
<p>Available to read in full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://bjgp.org/content/64/625/e493.long" target="_blank">http://bjgp.org/content/64/625/e493.long</a></p>
<p>Tubeuf, S., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Cost effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for parents deciding about MMR vaccination: A three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. <em>British Journal of General Practice, 64</em>(625), e493-e499.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-08-01 09:43:07.982</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>HPV vaccination for school boys not yet cost-effective – study</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48456/hpv-vaccination-for-school-boys-not-yet-cost/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48456/hpv-vaccination-for-school-boys-not-yet-cost/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><em>University of Otago media release, 14 July 2014 </em></p>
<p><span>HPV vaccination of New Zealand school boys is not yet a value-for-money option, according to a study just published by the University of Otago, Wellington.</span></p>
<p>Until the vaccine price drops and various other cost-saving strategies are also adopted &ndash; such as using just two doses rather than the current three doses of vaccine &ndash; the Government should focus on increasing HPV vaccination uptake in girls at schools, the authors say.</p>
<p>One of the study&rsquo;s authors, Associate Professor Nick Wilson, says New Zealand has &ldquo;some way to go&rdquo; to catch up to the coverage levels of over 80% of school girls seen in some other countries such as the UK.</p>
<p>One way to achieve this could be to follow these other countries by continuing to allow free vaccination in the school setting for 12-year-old girls, but not funding other out-of-school options which parents sometimes don&rsquo;t follow up on, Wilson says.</p>
<p>HPV vaccination is showing benefits around the world in terms of markedly dropping rates of genital warts and some types of pre-cancer, which can proceed on to cervical cancer. The vaccination is also very likely to prevent a range of other genital cancers and head and neck cancer in both women and men.</p>
<p>The University of Otago, Wellington study found that the current programme for girls was good value for money, but adding vaccination for boys would cost a lot more per amount of health gained - vaccination of boys at the level of coverage as currently achieved for girls would cost $117,500 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.</p>
<p>&ldquo;This is clearly not cost-effective when using a typical threshold of the GDP-per-capita of New Zealand to gain an extra year of healthy life, which is around $45,000,&rdquo; Wilson says.</p>
<p>&ldquo;If New Zealand invested in vaccinating boys, there would be the likely opportunity cost of not funding interventions that achieve more health gain or, more bluntly, not getting the biggest &lsquo;bang for our buck&rsquo; elsewhere in the health sector.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Wilson suggests New Zealand would perhaps be better off investing in other vaccinations such as the meningococcal C vaccination used in a campaign in Northland recently.<br />However, the price of the HPV vaccine is almost certain to drop in the future, especially as PHARMAC has now taken over the role of price negotiating from the Ministry of Health, Wilson says.</p>
<p>PHARMAC can now negotiate vaccine prices at the same time as contracts for other products from the same pharmaceutical manufacturers.</p>
<p>The study found that a lower vaccine price would improve the cost-effectiveness of vaccinating boys. However, the combined vaccine and administration costs had to be under $125 per dose of vaccine delivered, before vaccinating boys became cost-effective at the GDP-per-capita threshold.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Vaccinations are usually great value for money &ndash; but we are not at this point with giving the HPV vaccination for boys,&rdquo; Wilson says.</p>
<p>The Australian Government is now providing fully subsidised HPV vaccination to school boys &ndash; in large part because this government seems to have struck a particularly good deal with the vaccine manufacturer, Wilson says.</p>
<p>&ldquo;But national pride might also have played a part &ndash; since the HPV vaccine was first invented in Australia.&rdquo;</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48185/" target="_blank">study is published in the international peer-reviewed journal&nbsp;<em>BMC Infectious Diseases</em></a>, and the study team was predominantly funded by the Health Research Council.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-07-14 12:45:28.865</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Costs of bronchoalveolar lavage-directed therapy in the first 5 years of life for children with cystic fibrosis</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48323/costs-of-bronchoalveolar-lavage-directed/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48323/costs-of-bronchoalveolar-lavage-directed/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-07-08 09:05:14.748</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Economic evaluations of tobacco control mass media campaigns: A systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48221/economic-evaluations-of-tobacco-control-mass/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48221/economic-evaluations-of-tobacco-control-mass/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<div id="sec-1" class="subsection">
<p id="p-2">The aim of this study was to systematically and comprehensively review economic evaluations of tobacco control mass media campaigns.</p>
</div>
<div id="sec-3" class="subsection">
<p id="p-4">Ten studies were included in the review. All included a cost effectiveness analysis, a cost utility analysis or both. On the whole, studies were well conducted, but the interventions were often poorly described in terms of campaign content and intensity, and cost information was frequently inadequate. All studies concluded that tobacco control mass media campaigns are a cost effective public health intervention.</p>
</div>
<div id="sec-4" class="subsection">
<p id="p-5"><span>This is an open access article and can be read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2014/07/01/tobaccocontrol-2014-051579.full" target="_blank">http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2014/07/01/tobaccocontrol-2014-051579.full</a></span></p>
<p><span>Atusingwize, E., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Economic evaluations of tobacco control mass media campaigns: A systematic review. <em>Tobacco Control, 1 July</em> [Epub before print]</span></p>
</div>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-07-02 12:15:00.57</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Is expanding HPV vaccination programs to include school-aged boys likely to be value-for-money: A cost-utility analysis in a country with an existing school-girl program</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48185/is-expanding-hpv-vaccination-programs-to/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48185/is-expanding-hpv-vaccination-programs-to/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-07-01 13:16:59.913</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Economic evaluation of a hospital-initiated intervention for smokers with chronic disease, in Ontario, Canada</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47904/economic-evaluation-of-a-hospital-initiated/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47904/economic-evaluation-of-a-hospital-initiated/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<div id="sec-1" class="subsection">
<p id="p-2">The authors modelled the cost-effectiveness of the Ottawa Model for Smoking Cessation (OMSC), an intervention that includes in-hospital counselling, pharmacotherapy and posthospital follow-up, compared to usual care among smokers hospitalised with acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.</p>
</div>
<div id="sec-2">
<p id="p-3">They concluded that, from the hospital payer's perspective, delivery of the OMSC can be considered cost effective with 1-year cost per <span>quality-adjusted life year (</span>QALY) gained of $C1386, and lifetime cost per QALY gained of $C68. In the first year, they calculated that provision of the OMSC to 15 326 smokers would generate 4689 quitters, and would prevent 116 rehospitalisations, 923 hospital days, and 119 deaths.&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div id="sec-4">
<p id="p-5">They also note that an important consideration is the relatively low intervention cost compared to the reduction in costs related to readmissions for illnesses associated with continued smoking.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and is available to download and read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2014/06/15/tobaccocontrol-2013-051483.full" target="_blank">http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2014/06/15/tobaccocontrol-2013-051483.full</a></p>
<p>Mullen, K-A., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Economic evaluation of a hospital-initiated intervention for smokers with chronic disease, in Ontario, Canada. <em>Tobacco Control, 16 June</em> [Epub before print]</p>
</div>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-06-17 09:01:24.724</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>What is the evidence on the economic impacts of integrated care?</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47762/what-is-the-evidence-on-the-economic-impacts/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47762/what-is-the-evidence-on-the-economic-impacts/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This policy summary, commissioned by the European Commission&rsquo;s Directorate-General for Health &amp; Consumers, reviews the existing evidence on the economic impact of integrated care approaches.</p>
<p>The authors find that, although it is "... generally accepted that integrated care models have a positive effect on the quality of care, health outcomes and patient satisfaction, it is less clear how cost effective they are. As the evidence-base in this field is rather weak, the authors suggest that we may have to revisit our understanding of the concept and our expectations in terms of its assessment".</p>
<p>The report is available to download and read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.integratedcaretoday.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2014/06/What-is-the-evidence-on-the-economic-impacts-of-integrated-care.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.integratedcaretoday.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2014/06/What-is-the-evidence-on-the-economic-impacts-of-integrated-care.pdf</a></p>
<p>Nolte, E. &amp; Pitchforth, E. (2014).&nbsp;<em>What is the evidence on the economic impacts of integrated care?</em> Copenhagen:&nbsp;Regional Ofﬁce for Europe of&nbsp;the World Health Organization.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-06-10 14:15:23.591</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>CDC central-line bloodstream infection prevention efforts produced net benefits of at least $640 million during 1990–2008 (U.S.)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47641/cdc-central-line-bloodstream-infection-prevention/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47641/cdc-central-line-bloodstream-infection-prevention/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The authors measured the net economic benefits of preventing <span>central line-associated bloodstream infections in patients in hospital critical care units (</span>Medicare and Medicaid patients) from 1990 to 2008, "... a time when reductions attributable to federal investment resulted primarily from CDC efforts". </span></p>
<p><span>They found that the "... estimated net economic benefits ranged from $640&nbsp;million to $1.8&nbsp;billion, with the corresponding net benefits per case averted ranging from $15,780 to $24,391. The per dollar rate of return on the CDC&rsquo;s investments ranged from $3.88 to $23.85".&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0865" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0865</span></a></span><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></span></p>
<p><span>Scott, R.D., et al. (2014).&nbsp;CDC central-line bloodstream infection prevention efforts produced net benefits of at least $640 million during 1990&ndash;2008. <em>Health Affairs, 33</em>(6), 1040-1047.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-06-04 11:41:46.548</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A systematic review of the cost and cost-effectiveness of telehealth for patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47593/a-systematic-review-of-the-cost-and-cost/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47593/a-systematic-review-of-the-cost-and-cost/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This systematic review investigated the evidence on the costs and cost-effectiveness of telehealth for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p>
<p>Six relevant economic evaluations were assessed (3 from North America and 3 studies from Europe). "All studies reported the use of home monitoring devices that measured and transmitted different physical indicators to nurses who provided personalised feedback to patients during weekdays. The six studies involved a total of 559 COPD patients of whom 281 were randomised to telehealth. The review demonstrated a potential for cost savings ... However, the quality of the economic evidence was poor ....[and] caution is advised for healthcare decision-makers seeking large-scale implementation of telehealth in routine clinical practice".</p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1357633X14533896" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1177/1357633X14533896</span></a><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>
<p>Udsen, F.W., et al. (2014).&nbsp;A systematic review of the cost and cost-effectiveness of telehealth for patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.&nbsp;<em>Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 20</em>(4), 212-220.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-06-02 13:18:03.098</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Quality, cost, and their trade-off in treating AMI and stroke patients in European hospitals</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47350/quality-cost-and-their-trade-off-in-treating/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47350/quality-cost-and-their-trade-off-in-treating/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Describes the quality of hospital care by pooling patient-level data from five European countries (Finland, France, Germany, Spain, and Sweden) in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke. Large differences between hospitals and countries in rates of patients discharged alive were found for both AMI and stroke but a clear cost-quality trade-off was not found.</p>
<p><span><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.healthpolicyjrnl.com/article/S0168-8510%2814%2900130-4/abstract" target="_blank">http://www.healthpolicyjrnl.com/article/S0168-8510%2814%2900130-4/abstract</a></span><span> or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></span></p>
<p>Hakkinen, U., et al. (2014). Quality, cost, and their trade-off in treating AMI and stroke patients in European hospitals. <em>Health Policy,&nbsp;117</em>(1), 15&ndash;27.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-05-21 12:23:04.982</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent cardiovascular disease in Australia&#039;s indigenous population</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47149/cost-effectiveness-of-interventions-to-prevent/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47149/cost-effectiveness-of-interventions-to-prevent/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of disease burden in Australia's Indigenous population, and the greatest contributor to the Indigenous &lsquo;health gap&rsquo;. This paper used cost-utility analysis to evaluate five interventions (one community-based and four pharmacological) to prevent cardiovascular disease in Australia's Indigenous population. It was found that all pharmacological interventions produced more Indigenous health benefit when delivered via Indigenous health services, but cost-effectiveness ratios were higher due to greater health service costs. Cost-effectiveness ratios were also higher in remote than in non-remote regions. The polypill was the most cost-effective intervention evaluated, while the community-based intervention produced the most health gain.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.heartlungcirc.org/article/S1443-9506(13)01315-2/abstract" target="_blank">http://www.heartlungcirc.org/article/S1443-9506(13)01315-2/abstract</a> or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</p>
<p>Ong, K. S., et al. (2014). Cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent cardiovascular disease in Australia's indigenous population. <em>Heart, Lung and Circulation, 23</em> (5), 414-421.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-05-09 07:59:31.231</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Determinants of the relationship between cost and survival time after elective adult cardiac surgery</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47058/determinants-of-the-relationship-between/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47058/determinants-of-the-relationship-between/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Uses the long-term outcome data of a cohort study on adult cardiac surgical patients to determine the relationship between cost and survival time after cardiac surgery. Of the 2131 patients considered in this study, a total cost &gt;A$100,000 per life-year after cardiac surgery was observed only in 171 patients. Age, Charlson Comorbidity Index and EuroSCORE were all related to the cost per life-year after cardiac surgery, but EuroSCORE was the most important determinant. Patients with a high EuroSCORE had a substantially longer length of intensive care unit stay and cumulative hospital stay, as well as a shorter survival time after cardiac surgery compared to patients with a lower EuroSCORE.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.aaic.net.au/Document/?D=20140045" target="_blank">http://www.aaic.net.au/Document/?D=20140045</a> or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</p>
<p>Ho, K. M. (2014). Determinants of the relationship between cost and survival time after elective adult cardiac surgery. <em>Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 42</em> (3), 303-309.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-05-07 08:33:02.803</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Benefits from immunization during the Vaccines for Children program era — United States, 1994–2013</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46872/benefits-from-immunization-during-the-vaccines/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46872/benefits-from-immunization-during-the-vaccines/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p class="fb-answer">The Vaccines for Children (VFC) program in the United States was implemented in 1994 in response to low immunisation coverage and the 1989&ndash;1991 measles outbreak in the United States. In the 20 years since the VFC program was implemented, five new vaccines have been added to the routine infant immunisation program, increasing the number of diseases prevented to 14. Vaccination coverage has remained near or above 90% for older vaccines. Because of vaccination, approximately 322 million illnesses, 21 million hospitalisations, and 732,000 premature deaths will be prevented among children born during this period, at a cost savings to society of $1.38 trillion.</p>
<p class="fb-answer">To access a free full text version of the article, go to: <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6316a4.htm?s_cid=mm6316a4_x" target="_blank">http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6316a4.htm?s_cid=mm6316a4_x</a></p>
<p class="fb-answer">Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Benefits from immunization during the Vaccines for Children program era &mdash; United States, 1994&ndash;2013. <em>Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)</em>, 63 (16), 352-355.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-04-25 11:18:37.089</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The cost effectiveness of contemporary home haemodialysis modalities compared to facility haemodialysis: A systematic review of full economic evaluations</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46840/the-cost-effectiveness-of-contemporary-home/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46840/the-cost-effectiveness-of-contemporary-home/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-04-24 13:44:27.939</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A cost-effectiveness analysis of online, radio and print tobacco control advertisements targeting 25–39 year-old males (Australia)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46827/a-cost-effectiveness-analysis-of-online-radio/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46827/a-cost-effectiveness-analysis-of-online-radio/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<div class="para">
<p>Assesses the relative cost-effectiveness of various non-television advertising media (including radio and online media) in encouraging 25&ndash;39 year-old male smokers to respond to a cessation-related call to action. It was found that, contrary to the current assumption that the use of a consistent message across multiple media is the most cost-effective way of reaching target audiences, the online-only campaign phase was substantially more cost-effective than the other phases.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1753-6405.12175/abstract" target="_blank">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1753-6405.12175/abstract</a> or contact your DHB library, local or organisational library for assistance.</p>
<p>Clayforth, C., et al. (2014). A cost-effectiveness analysis of online, radio and print tobacco control advertisements targeting 25&ndash;39 year-old males. <em>Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health</em>,<em>&nbsp;</em><span><em>&nbsp;38:&nbsp;</em>270&ndash;274</span></p>
</div>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-04-24 09:55:00.645</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Costs and benefits of an organised fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program in the United States</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46784/costs-and-benefits-of-an-organised-fecal/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46784/costs-and-benefits-of-an-organised-fecal/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<div id="cncr28724-sec-0002" class="section">
<div class="para">
<p>The authors estimate the initial investment required and the cost per person screened of a nationwide fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer screening program among adults aged 50 years to 75 years. The initial additional investment required was estimated at $277.9 to $318.2 million annually, with an estimated 8.7 to 9.4 million individuals screened at a cost of $32 to $39 per person screened. The programme was estimated to prevent 2900 to 3100 deaths annually.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.28724/abstract" target="_blank">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.28724/abstract</a> or contact your DHB library, or local or organisational library for assistance.</p>
</div>
</div>
<p>Guy Jr, G., P., et al. (2014). Costs and benefits of an organised fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program in the United States. <em>Cancer,&nbsp;<span>120:&nbsp;</span></em>2308&ndash;2315.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-04-22 08:07:10.768</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost-effectiveness of family history-based colorectal cancer screening in Australia</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46743/cost-effectiveness-of-family-history-based/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46743/cost-effectiveness-of-family-history-based/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p style="line-height: 160%;">This study developed a Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of three screening strategies offered to people at increased risk of&nbsp;colorectal cancer (CRC) due to a strong family history of the cancer. Screening with biennial iFOBT, five-yearly colonoscopy and ten-yearly colonoscopy were compared with the current strategy of the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (i.e. base case). At AU$12,405 per life year gained and an average lifetime expectancy of 16.084 years, five-yearly colonoscopy screening was found to be the most cost-effective strategy. The model demonstrated that intensive colorectal cancer screening strategies targeting people at increased risk would be cost-effective in the Australian context. The authors suggest that substantial health benefits can be generated from risk-based CRC screening at a relatively modest incremental cost.</p>
<p style="line-height: 160%;">To read the full abstract, and for access to a free full text version of the article, go to: <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/14/261/abstract" target="_blank">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/14/261/abstract</a></p>
<p style="line-height: 160%;">Ouakrim, D. A., et al. (2014). Cost-effectiveness of family history-based colorectal cancer screening in Australia. <em>BMC Cancer</em>, 14, 261.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-04-16 17:31:39.815</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A systematic review to assess cost effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in colorectal surgery</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46734/a-systematic-review-to-assess-cost-effectiveness/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46734/a-systematic-review-to-assess-cost-effectiveness/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-04-16 13:54:29.232</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Translation of research results to simple estimates of the likely effect of a lung cancer screening programme in the United Kingdom</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46420/translation-of-research-results-to-simple/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46420/translation-of-research-results-to-simple/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper utilises published results on lung cancer screening and natural history parameters to estimate the likely effects of annual and biennial screening programmes in different risk populations, in terms of deaths prevented and of human costs, including screening episodes, further investigation rates and overdiagnosis.</p>
<p class="norm">Annual screening with the UK Lung Screening Study eligibility criteria was estimated to result in 956 lung cancer deaths prevented and 457 overdiagnosed cancers from 330<span class="mb"><span class="mb">&thinsp;</span></span>000 screening episodes. Biennial screening would result in 802 lung cancer deaths prevented and 383 overdiagnosed cancers for 180<span class="mb"><span class="mb">&thinsp;</span></span>000 screening episodes. The authors suggest that the intervention effect could justify the human costs and that the benefit of biennial screening is subject to additional uncertainty but the issue merits further empirical research.</p>
<p class="norm"><span class="Abstract 0">To read the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v110/n7/full/bjc201463a.html" target="_blank">http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v110/n7/full/bjc201463a.html</a> or contact your local, DHB or organsational library for assistance.</span></p>
<p class="norm"><span class="Abstract 0">Duffy, S. W., et al. (2014). Translation of research results to simple estimates of the likely effect of a lung cancer screening programme in the United Kingdom. <em><span class="journalname">British Journal of Cancer</span></em>, 110, 1834-1840.<br /></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-04-03 11:56:49.126</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Benefits and harms of cervical screening from age 20 years compared with screening from age 25 years</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46412/benefits-and-harms-of-cervical-screening/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46412/benefits-and-harms-of-cervical-screening/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p class="norm">Quantifies the benefits (cancer prevention and down-staging) and harms (recall and excess treatment) of cervical screening starting from age 20 years rather than from age 25 years. Routine screening and cancer incidence statistics from Wales (for screening from age 20 years) and England (screening from 25 years) are used to estimate the number of: screening tests, women with abnormal results, referrals to colposcopy, women treated, and diagnoses of micro-invasive and frank-invasive cervical cancers in women invited for screening from age 20 years and from 25 years.</p>
<p class="norm">Analysis indicates that inviting 100<span class="mb"><span class="mb">&thinsp;</span></span>000 women from age 20 years yields an additional: 119<span class="mb"><span class="mb">&thinsp;</span></span>000 screens, 20<span class="mb"><span class="mb">&thinsp;</span></span>000 non-negative results, 8000 colposcopy referrals, and an extra 3000 women treated when compared with inviting from age 25 years. Screening from age 20 years prevents between three and nine frank invasive cancers and between 0 and 23 cancers in total (depending on the scenario). To prevent one frank invasive cancer, it is necessary to do between 12<span class="mb"><span class="mb">&thinsp;</span></span>500 and 40<span class="mb"><span class="mb">&thinsp;</span></span>000 additional screening tests in the age group 20&ndash;24 years and treat between 300 and 900 women.</p>
<p class="norm">To read the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v110/n7/abs/bjc201465a.html" target="_blank">http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v110/n7/abs/bjc201465a.html</a> or contact your local, DHB or organsational library for assistance.</p>
<p class="norm">Landy, R., et al. (2014). Benefits and harms of cervical screening from age 20 years compared with screening from age 25 years. <em>British Journal of Cancer</em>, 110, 1841-1846.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-04-03 09:12:21.394</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46394/a-systematic-assessment-of-benefits-and-risks/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46394/a-systematic-assessment-of-benefits-and-risks/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Reviews&nbsp; the evidence on the mortality benefit and chief harms of mammography screening and what is known about how to individualise mammography screening decisions, including communicating risks and benefits to patients. Results of the literature review indicated that mammography screening is associated with a 19% overall reduction of breast cancer mortality (approximately 15% for women in their 40s and 32% for women in their 60s). For a 40- or 50-year-old woman undergoing 10 years of annual mammograms, the cumulative risk of a false-positive result is about 61%. About 19% of the cancers diagnosed during that 10-year period would not have become clinically apparent without screening (overdiagnosis), although there is uncertainty about this estimate. The net benefit of screening depends greatly on baseline breast cancer risk, which should be incorporated into screening decisions. Decision aids have the potential to help patients integrate information about risks and benefits with their own values and priorities, although they are not yet widely available for use in clinical practice.</span></p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for access to a free full text version of the article, go to: <a href="http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1853165" target="_blank">http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1853165</a><span><br /></span></p>
<p>Pace, L. E., &amp; Keating, N. L. (2014). A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions. <em>JAMA</em>, 311 (13), 1327-1335.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-04-02 14:06:23.075</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Concerns for severity in priority setting in health care: A review of trade-off data in preference studies and implications for societal willingness to pay for a QALY</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46391/concerns-for-severity-in-priority-setting/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46391/concerns-for-severity-in-priority-setting/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>In a wide range of health care jurisdictions, to give priority to the severely ill over the less severely ill is important in decisions about resource allocation across patient groups. This review of evidence summarises data on concerns for severity measured at a cardinal level in preference studies in various countries and shows how the data may provide guidance for determining severity graded willingness to pay for a QALY. Analysis revealed that concerns for severity show up quite strongly across countries, sample types and question framings, although the size of the severity gradient varies. The authors hope that policy makers may find the central tendency in the results to be useful as an input to determining severity dependent willingness to pay for a QALY.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to: <a href="http://www.healthpolicyjrnl.com/article/S0168-8510%2814%2900056-6/abstract" target="_blank">http://www.healthpolicyjrnl.com/article/S0168-8510%2814%2900056-6/abstract</a> or contact your local, DHB or organsational library for assistance.</p>
<p>Nord, E., &amp; Johansen, R. (2014). Concerns for severity in priority setting in health care: A review of trade-off data in preference studies and implications for societal willingness to pay for a QALY. <em>Health Policy</em>,&nbsp;116(2-3), 281&ndash;288.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-04-02 13:49:17.928</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost-effectiveness and equity impacts of three HPV vaccination programmes for school-aged girls in New Zealand</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46047/cost-effectiveness-and-equity-impacts-of/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46047/cost-effectiveness-and-equity-impacts-of/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-03-25 15:49:24.942</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A cost-effectiveness analysis of a telephone-linked care intervention for individuals with Type 2 diabetes (Australia)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/45357/a-cost-effectiveness-analysis-of-a-telephone/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/45357/a-cost-effectiveness-analysis-of-a-telephone/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The authors assess the cost-effectiveness of an automated telephone-linked intervention&nbsp;compared to usual care. <em>Australian TLC Diabetes</em> was&nbsp;delivered over 6 months to patients with established Type 2 diabetes mellitus and high glycated haemoglobin level.</p>
<p>From the results of the study, the authors conclude that the intervention "...&nbsp;was a low-cost investment for individuals with established diabetes and may result in medication cost-savings to the health system. Although QALYs were similar between groups, other benefits arising from the intervention should also be considered when determining the overall value of this strategy".</p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.12.032" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1016/j.diabres.2013.12.032</span></a><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>
<p>Gordon, L.G., et al. (2014).&nbsp;A cost-effectiveness analysis of a telephone-linked care intervention for individuals with Type 2 diabetes.&nbsp;<em>Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice,&nbsp;104</em>(1), 103-111.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-02-19 12:53:33.176</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Potential gains and costs from increasing access to thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke patients in New Zealand hospitals</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43467/potential-gains-and-costs-from-increasing/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43467/potential-gains-and-costs-from-increasing/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-11-13 10:36:14.618</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Methods of international health technology assessment agencies for economic evaluations - a comparative analysis</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/42546/methods-of-international-health-technology/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/42546/methods-of-international-health-technology/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The objective of this study is to provide an overview and comparison of the methodological recommendations of international health technology assessment (HTA) agencies for economic evaluations.</p>
<p>The webpages of 127 international HTA agencies were searched for guidelines containing recommendations on methods for the preparation of economic evaluations. Additionally, the HTA agencies were requested information on methods for economic evaluations.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Twenty-five publications of 14 HTA agencies were included in the analysis. The authors found that methods for economic evaluations vary widely. The greatest accordance could be found for the type of analysis and comparator.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The authors conclude that there&nbsp;is a considerable unexplainable variance in recommendations. Further effort is needed to harmonize methods for preparing economic evaluations.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and is available to read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/13/371">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/13/371</a></p>
<p>Mathes, T., et al. (2013).&nbsp;Methods of international health technology assessment agencies for economic evaluations- a comparative analysis.&nbsp;<em>BMC Health Services Research, 13</em>:371.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-10-02 09:58:09.707</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Savings from preventing lifetime smoking and obesity in young adults: A scoping study</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/41024/savings-from-preventing-lifetime-smoking/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/41024/savings-from-preventing-lifetime-smoking/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-07-31 13:46:14.832</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost–utility analysis of a shock-absorbing floor intervention to prevent injuries from falls in hospital wards for older people (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40818/cost-utility-analysis-of-a-shock-absorbing/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40818/cost-utility-analysis-of-a-shock-absorbing/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This cost-utility analysis used data from a&nbsp;pilot cluster randomised controlled trial and the wider literature&nbsp;to assess the cost-effectiveness of shock-absorbing flooring compared with standard hospital flooring in hospital wards for older people.</span></p>
<p>Eight hospital sites across England participated with four installing shock-absorbing flooring in one bay, and four maintaining their standard flooring.</p>
<p id="p-6">While the shock-absorbing flooring was cost saving, it generated QALY (quality-adjusted life years) losses due to an increase in the faller rate. The authors note that fursther research is required to investigate whether the intervention flooring results in a higher faller rate than standard flooring.</p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/content/42/5/641.abstract">http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/content/42/5/641.abstract</a></span><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>
<p>Latimer, N., et al. (2013).&nbsp;Cost&ndash;utility analysis of a shock-absorbing floor intervention to prevent injuries from falls in hospital wards for older people. <em>Age and Ageing,&nbsp;42</em>(5), 641-645</p>
<p>See also: <em>Pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of flooring to reduce injuries from falls in wards for older people:&nbsp;<a href="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/content/42/5/633">http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/content/42/5/633</a></em></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-07-23 11:29:42.982</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A systematic review of economic evaluations of enhanced recovery pathways for colorectal surgery</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40419/a-systematic-review-of-economic-evaluations/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40419/a-systematic-review-of-economic-evaluations/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This systematic review of economic evaluations of enhanced recovery pathways for colorectal surgery found that the&nbsp;quality of current evidence is limited but tends to support the cost-effectiveness of&nbsp;enhanced recovery pathways.</p>
<p>Only 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and overall quality was poor. The authors note that there is a need for well-designed trials to determine the cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery pathway&nbsp;from institutional and societal perspectives.</p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=2014&amp;issue=04000&amp;article=00010&amp;type=abstract" target="_blank">http://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=2014&amp;issue=04000&amp;article=00010&amp;type=abstract</a></span><br /><span>or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>
<p>Lee, L., et al. (2014).&nbsp;A systematic review of economic evaluations of enhanced recovery pathways for colorectal surgery. <em>Annals of Surgery, 259</em>(4),&nbsp;670&ndash;676.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-06-28 10:54:55.416</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers (Cochrane review)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40377/effectiveness-and-cost-effectiveness-of-home/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40377/effectiveness-and-cost-effectiveness-of-home/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The objectives of this review were to:&nbsp;1. quantify the effect of home palliative care services for adult patients with advanced illness and their family caregivers on patients' odds of dying at home;&nbsp;2. examine the clinical effectiveness of home palliative care services on other outcomes for patients and their caregivers;&nbsp;3. compare resource use and costs associated with services;&nbsp;4. investigate current evidence on cost-effectiveness.</p>
<p>The authors conclude that there is "... clear and reliable evidence that home palliative care increases the chance of dying at home and reduces symptom burden in particular for patients with cancer, without impacting on caregiver grief ... More work is needed to study cost-effectiveness especially for people with non-malignant conditions .... and to compare different models of home palliative care".</p>
<p>This article is available to read in full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007760.pub2/full">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007760.pub2/full</a></p>
<p>Gomes, B., Calanzani, N., Curiale, V., McCrone, P. &amp; Higginson, I.J. (2013). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers. <em>Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6</em>. Art. No.: CD007760. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007760.pub2.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-06-27 09:43:57.184</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Making the case for cardiac rehabilitation: Modelling potential impact on readmissions (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40104/making-the-case-for-cardiac-rehabilitation/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40104/making-the-case-for-cardiac-rehabilitation/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This 2013 report summarises the findings of a short study, commissioned by NHS Improvement in the UK, which models the relationship between uptake of cardiac rehabilitation and unplanned cardiac readmission rates both nationally and at commissioner level<strong>.</strong></p>
<p>The primary purpose of the study was to examine the Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) potential of&nbsp;cardiac rehabilitation and to establish whether the benefits of&nbsp;cardiac rehabilitation outweigh the costs in terms of the potential impact on readmissions alone.</p>
<p>Over and above the well-documented, positive effects of rehabilitation on mortality, morbidity and quality of life, the results suggest that increasing the uptake of&nbsp; 'gold standard' cardiac rehabilitation has the potential to reduce cardiac-related readmissions and deliver significant financial savings.</p>
<p>Access to the full text of the report is free online at: <a href="http://www.improvement.nhs.uk/documents/Case_for_CR.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.improvement.nhs.uk/documents/Case_for_CR.pdf</a><strong><br /></strong></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-06-13 13:23:48.567</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The cost—effectiveness of call-back counselling for smoking cessation (Australia)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40048/the-cost-effectiveness-of-call-back-counselling/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40048/the-cost-effectiveness-of-call-back-counselling/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This study assessed the cost&ndash;effectiveness of Quitline, a call-back counselling service for smoking cessation, in the states of Queensland, Western Australia and the Northern Territory in Australia.</p>
<p>After analysis, the study found that call-back counselling was a cost-effective intervention for smoking cessation that could be provided by a centralised service for a large population, and to reach people in isolated communities.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to: <a href="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2013/06/07/tobaccocontrol-2012-050907.short" target="_blank">http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2013/06/07/tobaccocontrol-2012-050907.short</a> or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</p>
<p>Lal, A., et al. (2013). The cost&mdash;effectiveness of call-back counselling for smoking cessation. <em>Tobacco Control</em>, [published online First 8 June 2013].</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-06-11 11:17:39.172</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Risk assessment to guide prostate cancer screening decisions: A cost-effectiveness analysis (Australia)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39996/risk-assessment-to-guide-prostate-cancer/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39996/risk-assessment-to-guide-prostate-cancer/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This study applied the most recent evidence from randomised trials of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening and explored the potential value of risk assessments to guide the use of PSA screening in practice.</p>
<p>The study used a decision model that incorporated a Markov process that was developed in 2012&nbsp;to estimate the net benefit and cost of PSA screening versus no screening as a function of baseline risk. The study found that the harms of screening outweighed the benefits under a number of plausible scenarios. Conclusions were sensitive to the estimated quality-of-life impacts of prostate cancer treatment as well as the incidence of cancers not detected by screening tests (poorer prognosis) and those that were detected by screening tests (better prognosis).</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for access to a free full text version of the article, go to: <a href="https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2013/198/10/risk-assessment-guide-prostate-cancer-screening-decisions-cost-effectiveness" target="_blank">https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2013/198/10/risk-assessment-guide-prostate-cancer-screening-decisions-cost-effectiveness</a></p>
<p>Martin, A. J., et al. (2013). Risk assessment to guide prostate cancer screening decisions: A cost-effectiveness analysis. <em>Medical Journal of Australia</em>, 198(10), 546-550.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-06-07 13:38:25.884</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost effectiveness of patient education for the prevention of falls in hospital: Economic evaluation from a randomized controlled trial (Australia)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39759/cost-effectiveness-of-patient-education-for/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39759/cost-effectiveness-of-patient-education-for/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Falls are one of the most frequently occurring adverse events that impact upon the recovery of older hospital inpatients, and they can threaten both immediate and longer-term health and independence.</p>
<p>The authors undertook an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis from the health service provider perspective, over the period of hospitalisation (time horizon) using the Australian Dollar&nbsp; at 2008 values. Analyses were based on data from a randomized trial among 1,206 acute and rehabilitation inpatients. The intervention implemented was a multimedia patient education program provided with trained health professional follow-up shown to reduce falls among cognitively intact hospital patients.</p>
<p>The authors found that there was a 52% probability the complete program was both more effective and less costly (from the health service perspective) than providing usual care alone.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for access to a free full text version of the article, go to: <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/135/abstract" target="_blank">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/135/abstract</a></p>
<p>Haines, T. P., et al. (2013). Cost effectiveness of patient education for the prevention of falls in hospital: economic evaluation from a randomized controlled trial. <em>BMC Medicine</em>, 11:135.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-05-24 11:20:06.666</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery programme for vaginal hysterectomy: A comparison of pre and post-implementation expenditures (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39630/cost-effectiveness-of-enhanced-recovery-after/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39630/cost-effectiveness-of-enhanced-recovery-after/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>In this case-control study, the perioperative expenditure for 45 women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy at a North London teaching hospital after implementation of an enhanced recovery pathway was compared with 45 matched controls prior to implementation.</p>
<p>After taking into account the varying expenditures, the authors demonstrated there was a saving of 15.2% per patient after implementation of the pathway.</p>
<p>The study authors concluded that the cost efficiency savings, coupled with increased satisfaction and no rise in morbidity, offered a very attractive means of managing women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy. They believe that their data can be reproduced in other centres and recommend that the pathway be used routinely in women undergoing these procedures.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to: <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpm.2182/abstract" target="_blank">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpm.2182/abstract</a> or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</p>
<p>Relph, S., et al (2013). Cost effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery programme for vaginal hysterectomy: A comparison of pre and post-implementation expenditures. <em>The International Journal of Health Planning and Management</em>, [published online 10 May 2013].</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-05-17 10:16:01.732</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39468/consolidated-health-economic-evaluation-reporting/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39468/consolidated-health-economic-evaluation-reporting/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-05-08 15:34:13.223</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Nurse-led school-based clinics for skin infections and rheumatic fever prevention: Results from a pilot study in South Auckland</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39228/nurse-led-school-based-clinics-for-skin-infections/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39228/nurse-led-school-based-clinics-for-skin-infections/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-04-23 09:05:41.173</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Home telemonitoring for chronic disease management: An economic assessment (Canada)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38822/home-telemonitoring-for-chronic-disease-management/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38822/home-telemonitoring-for-chronic-disease-management/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This economic analysis investigated&nbsp;consumption of healthcare services by 95 patients with various chronic diseases over a 21-month period (before, during and after&nbsp;<span>home telemonitoring use)</span>.</p>
<p>The authors identified large reductions in number of hospitalisations, length of average hospital stay, and, to a lesser extent, number of emergency room visits, as a result of the telemonitoring intervention, although&nbsp;home visits by nurses increased both during and after the intervention.</p>
<p>Overall, the telehealth programme resulted in significant savings: the equivalent of over CAD1,557 per patient (as calculated on an annualised basis).&nbsp;The authors recommend&nbsp;additional assessments to confirm the cost-effectiveness of this mode of care delivery.</p>
<p><span>To view the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266462313000111" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266462313000111</a></span><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>
<p>Par&eacute;, G., et al. (2013).&nbsp;Home telemonitoring for chronic disease management: An economic assessment.&nbsp;<em>International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 29</em>(2), 155-161.</p>
<p>The same evaluation is the subject of a white paper that is available in full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.telushealth.com/docs/default-source/whitepapers/home-monitoring-for-chronic-disease-management-an-economic-assessment.pdf?sfvrsn=12" target="_blank">http://www.telushealth.com/docs/default-source/whitepapers/home-monitoring-for-chronic-disease-management-an-economic-assessment.pdf?sfvrsn=12</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-04-02 12:46:15.31</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): Nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38699/cost-effectiveness-of-telehealth-for-patients/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38699/cost-effectiveness-of-telehealth-for-patients/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The aim of this economic evaluation, nested in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial, was to examine the costs and cost effectiveness of telehealth in addition to standard support and treatment, compared with standard support and treatment.</p>
<p>The study was a community based telehealth intervention in three local authority areas in England. Participants were&nbsp;3230 people with a long term condition (heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or diabetes) were recruited into the Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth trial between May 2008 and December 2009. Of participants taking part in the Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study examining acceptability, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness, 845 were randomised to telehealth and 728 to usual care.</p>
<p>Intervention participants received a package of telehealth equipment and monitoring services for 12 months, in addition to the standard health and social care services available in their area. Controls received usual health and social care.</p>
<p>The primary outcome for the cost effectiveness analysis was incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained.</p>
<p>The authors undertook net benefit analyses of costs and outcomes for 965 patients (534 receiving telehealth; 431 usual care). Based on this analysis they conclude that&nbsp;the QALY gain by patients using telehealth in addition to usual care was similar to that by patients receiving usual care only, and total costs associated with the telehealth intervention were higher. Telehealth does not seem to be a cost effective addition to standard support and treatment.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and is available to read in full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f1035" target="_blank">http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f1035</a></p>
<p>Henderson, C., et al. (2013).&nbsp;Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): Nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. <em>BMJ,&nbsp;346</em>:f1035.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-03-25 10:41:51.721</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost benefit analysis of the proposed  national surgical site infection surveillance and response programme</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38033/cost-benefit-analysis-of-the-proposed-national/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38033/cost-benefit-analysis-of-the-proposed-national/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-02-20 09:24:03.399</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Health care and lost productivity costs of overweight and obesity in New Zealand</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/37075/health-care-and-lost-productivity-costs-of/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/37075/health-care-and-lost-productivity-costs-of/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-12-12 12:11:27.966</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Effects of care pathways on the in-hospital treatment of heart failure: A systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/35395/effects-of-care-pathways-on-the-in-hospital/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/35395/effects-of-care-pathways-on-the-in-hospital/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The authors performed a systematic review to determine how care pathways in the hospital treatment of heart failure affect in-hospital mortality, length of in-hospital stay, readmission rate and hospitalisation cost when compared with standard care.</p>
<p>Seven studies met the study inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review with a total sample of 3,690 patients. The combined overall results showed that care pathways have a significant positive effect on mortality and readmission rate. A shorter length of hospital stay was also observed compared with the standard care group. No significant difference was found in the hospitalisation costs. More positive results were observed in controlled trials compared to randomized controlled trials.</p>
<p>The authors note that readers&nbsp;should be cautious with overall conclusions: "what works for one organization may not work for another because of the subtle differences in processes and bottlenecks".</p>
<p>This is an open access article and is available to read in full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/12/81/abstract">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/12/81/abstract</a></p>
<p>Kul, S., et al. (2012).&nbsp;Effects of care pathways on the in-hospital treatment of heart failure: A systematic review. <em>BMC Cardiovascular Disorders,&nbsp;12</em><span>:81&nbsp;</span><span class="pseudotab">doi:10.1186/1471-2261-12-81</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-09-26 08:49:28.711</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Investing in public health: Barriers and possible solutions</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/35377/investing-in-public-health-barriers-and-possible/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/35377/investing-in-public-health-barriers-and-possible/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-09-25 10:32:45.91</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Evaluating the effects of variation in clinical practice: A risk adjusted cost-effectiveness analysis of acute stroke services (Australia)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34698/evaluating-the-effects-of-variation-in-clinical/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34698/evaluating-the-effects-of-variation-in-clinical/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This study illustrates a general methodology for the comparative analysis of applied clinical practice at alternative institutions -- risk adjusted cost-effectiveness (RAC-E) analysis -- with an application that compares acute hospital services for stroke patients admitted to the main public hospitals in South Australia.</span></p>
<p><span><span>Using linked, routinely collected data on all South Australian hospital separations from July 2001 to June 2008, an analysis of the RAC-E of services provided at four metropolitan hospitals was undertaken using a decision analytic framework. Observed (plus extrapolated) and expected lifetime costs and survival were compared across patient populations, from which the relative cost-effectiveness of services provided at the different hospitals was estimated.</span></span></p>
<p><span>This is an open access article and is available to read in full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/266/abstract">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/266/abstract</a></span></p>
<p><span>Pham, C., et al. (2012).&nbsp;Evaluating the effects of variation in clinical practice: A risk adjusted cost-effectiveness (RAC-E) analysis of acute stroke services. <em>BMC Health Services Research, 12</em>: 266,&nbsp;<span>doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-266</span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-08-22 10:12:25.434</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Calculating the financial benefit of The Productive Ward: Releasing time to care: A how to guide to support the Rapid Impact Assessment (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34687/calculating-the-financial-benefit-of-the/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34687/calculating-the-financial-benefit-of-the/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This&nbsp;&lsquo;how to guide&rsquo;, published by the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, supports the <em>Rapid Impact Assessment</em> publication (2011).&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span>It can help staff to identify, track and calculate the financial benefits that may be associated with improvements gained from implementing The Productive Ward. &nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span>Both publications are available to download at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_value/productivity_series/productive_ward.html">http://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_value/productivity_series/productive_ward.html</a></span></p>
<p><span>&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-08-21 15:38:21.267</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A systematic review of economic evaluations of cardiac rehabilitation</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34449/a-systematic-review-of-economic-evaluations/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34449/a-systematic-review-of-economic-evaluations/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Cardiac rehabilitation (CR), a multidisciplinary program consisting of exercise, risk factor modification and psychosocial intervention, forms an integral part of managing patients after myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization surgery and percutaneous coronary interventions, as well as patients with heart failure (HF). </span></p>
<p><span>This systematic review seeks to examine the cost-effectiveness of CR for patients with MI or HF and inform policy makers in Singapore on published cost-effectiveness studies on CR.</span></p>
<p><span>This is an open access article and is available to read in full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/243/abstract">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/243/abstract</a></span></p>
<p><span>Wong, W.P., et al. (2012).&nbsp;A systematic review of economic evaluations of cardiac rehabilitation. <em>BMC Health Services Research, 12</em>:243.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-08-09 13:11:16.28</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost benefit analysis of the surgical safety checklist</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34311/cost-benefit-analysis-of-the-surgical-safety/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34311/cost-benefit-analysis-of-the-surgical-safety/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-08-02 12:22:40.069</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Healthcare costs for initial management of children with new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus (Alberta, Canda)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34237/healthcare-costs-for-initial-management-of/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34237/healthcare-costs-for-initial-management-of/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This retrospective chart review was undertaken for children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes seen at the Stollery Children's Hospital in Edmonton from 2007 to 2008 (<span>189 eligible patients)</span>.</p>
<p>The authors compared healthcare costs associated with the current outpatient management model with a more historic inpatient care model.</p>
<p>"Seventy-three (38.6%) patients were admitted to any hospital at diagnosis, of which 57 (30.2%) were admitted to our tertiary care facility. Total cost per patient was estimated to be $2140. If managed exclusively as an inpatient, cost per patient was estimated to be $5517, or 2.5 times greater than the outpatient model ($1443 per capita if not hospitalized in a tertiary centre)".</p>
<p>The authors suggest that this&nbsp;economic data endorses outpatient management models in Canada.</p>
<p><span>To view the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to:</span><br /><span><a href="http://www.canadianjournalofdiabetes.com/article/S1499-2671(12)00073-1/abstract">http://www.canadianjournalofdiabetes.com/article/S1499-2671(12)00073-1/abstract</a>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>
<p>Foulds, J., et al. (2012).&nbsp;Healthcare costs for initial management of children with new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus&nbsp;in Central and Northern Alberta.&nbsp;<em>Canadian Journal of Diabetes,&nbsp;36</em>(3) , 128-132.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-07-31 09:20:35.992</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Is the aim of the English health care system to maximize QALYs?</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34147/is-the-aim-of-the-english-health-care-system/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34147/is-the-aim-of-the-english-health-care-system/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This study compares the types of benefit considered relevant by the English Department of Health with those included by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) when conducting economic evaluations of options for spending limited health care resources.</span></p>
<p><span><span>The authors find that the two organisations approach resource allocation decisions in different ways, and suggest that there is a case for establishing a uniform framework for option appraisal and priority setting so as to avoid allocative inefficiency. They note that the same applies to any other national health care system.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span><span>To view the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to:</span><br /><span><a href="http://jhsrp.rsmjournals.com/content/17/3/157.abstract">http://jhsrp.rsmjournals.com/content/17/3/157.abstract</a>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span><span><span>Shah, K., et al. (2012).&nbsp;</span></span></span>Is the aim of the English health care system to maximize QALYs?&nbsp;<em>Journal of Health Services, Research &amp; Policy,&nbsp;17</em>(3), 157-163</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-07-25 15:49:20.414</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost avoidance associated with optimal stroke care in Canada</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34142/cost-avoidance-associated-with-optimal-stroke/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34142/cost-avoidance-associated-with-optimal-stroke/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This study assesses four aspects of stroke management (rapid assessment and treatment services, thrombolytic therapy, organized stroke units, and early home-supported discharge) and estimates the potential for cost avoidance in Canada if these services were provided in a comprehensive and optimal fashion.</span></p>
<p><span><span>To view the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to:</span><br /><span><a href="http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/43/8/2198.abstract">http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/43/8/2198.abstract</a>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>Krueger, H., et al. (2012).&nbsp;Cost avoidance associated with optimal stroke care in Canada. <em>Stroke, 43</em>, 2198-2206.</span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-07-25 11:40:34.774</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Estimating the cost of new public health legislation</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34012/estimating-the-cost-of-new-public-health/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34012/estimating-the-cost-of-new-public-health/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-07-17 09:18:16.571</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The cost of child health inequalities in Aotearoa New Zealand: A preliminary scoping study</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/33494/the-cost-of-child-health-inequalities-in/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/33494/the-cost-of-child-health-inequalities-in/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-06-19 13:01:42.605</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Assessing the return on investment in health IT - An exploration of costs and benefits in relation to the remote monitoring of chronic diseases</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/33172/assessing-the-return-on-investment-in-health/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/33172/assessing-the-return-on-investment-in-health/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-06-06 11:49:10.704</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Use of telephone and SMS reminders to improve attendance at hospital appointments: A systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/32961/use-of-telephone-and-sms-reminders-to-improve/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/32961/use-of-telephone-and-sms-reminders-to-improve/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Patients failing to attend hospital appointments contribute to inefficient use of resources. The authors conducted a systematic review of studies providing a reminder to patients by phone, short message service (SMS) or automated phone calls. </span></p>
<p><span>Twenty-nine studies were included in the review. Four had two intervention arms which were treated as independent studies, giving a total of 33 estimates. &nbsp;All studies except one reported a benefit from sending reminders to patients prior to their appointment. The synthesis suggests that the weighted mean relative change in non-attendance was 34% of the baseline non-attendance rate. Automated reminders were less effective than manual phone calls (29% vs 39% of baseline value). There appeared to be no difference in non-attendance rate, whether the reminder was sent the day before the appointment or the week before. Cost and savings were not measured formally in any of the papers, but almost half of them included cost estimates. The average cost of using either SMS, automated phone calls or phone calls was &euro;0.41 per reminder. </span></p>
<p><span>The authors conclude that, although formal evidence of cost-effectiveness is lacking, the implication of the review is that all hospitals should consider using automated reminders to reduce non-attendance at appointments.</span></p>
<p><span>Hasvold, P.E. &amp; Wootton, R. (2012).&nbsp;Use of telephone and SMS reminders to improve attendance at hospital appointments: a systematic review. <em>Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare,&nbsp;</em><span class="slug-vol"><em>17</em> (</span><span class="slug-issue">7),&nbsp;</span><span class="slug-pages">358-364.</span></span></p>
<p><span>This an open access article available to read in full text online at:&nbsp;<a href="http://jtt.rsmjournals.com/content/17/7/358.full">http://jtt.rsmjournals.com/content/17/7/358.full</a></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-05-25 13:08:59.226</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The effect of comprehensive state tobacco control programs on adult cigarette smoking (USA)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31521/the-effect-of-comprehensive-state-tobacco/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31521/the-effect-of-comprehensive-state-tobacco/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This study is the second to use the US national survey data to assess the  effect of comprehensive state tobacco control programs on adult  cigarette smoking.</p>
<p>Data are drawn from the Behavioral Risk Factor  Surveillance System (1991-2006) and reveal consistent evidence that  these programs have a statistically significant effect to reduce  prevalence of cigarette smoking among adults. Simulations indicate that  had all states spent the CDC recommended level of funding from 1991 to  2006 then cigarette smoking prevalence would have been 1.40 percent to  8.07 percent lower in 2006, translating to between 635,000 to 3.7  million fewer adult cigarette smokers.</p>
<p>Rhoads, Jennifer K. (2012).&nbsp; The effect of comprehensive state tobacco control programs on adult cigarette smoking. <em>Journal of Health Economics</em>, [Epublished 5 March 2012].</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to: <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629612000124" target="_blank">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629612000124</a> or contact your local or organisational library for assistance.</p>
<h1></h1>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-03-16 17:41:14.012</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Primary screening for human papillomavirus compared with cytology screening for cervical cancer in European settings: Cost effectiveness analysis based on a Dutch microsimulation model</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31360/primary-screening-for-human-papillomavirus/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31360/primary-screening-for-human-papillomavirus/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p id="p-7">Investigates, using a Dutch  model, whether screening for human papillomavirus (HPV) is preferred over  cytology screening for cervical cancer, and also calculates the preferred  number of examinations over a woman&rsquo;s lifetime. Unvaccinated women born between 1939 and 1992 from various European countries are included in the analysis.</p>
<p id="p-8">Analysis showed that primary HPV screening was the preferred primary test over the age of 30  in many considered scenarios. Primary cytology screening was preferred  only in scenarios with low costs of cytology and in scenarios with a  high prevalence of HPV in combination with high costs of HPV testing. The authors conclude, therefore, that most European countries should consider switching from primary cytology  to HPV screening for cervical cancer. HPV screening must, however, only  be implemented in situations where screening is well controlled.</p>
<p>de Kok, I. M. C. M., et al. (2012). Primary screening for human papillomavirus compared with cytology screening for cervical cancer in European settings: Cost effectiveness analysis based on a Dutch microsimulation model. <em>BMJ</em>, 344, e670.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for access to a free full text version of the article, go to: <a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e670" target="_blank">http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e670</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-03-06 11:40:10.106</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost-effectiveness of a cervical screening program with human papillomavirus vaccine</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31324/cost-effectiveness-of-a-cervical-screening/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31324/cost-effectiveness-of-a-cervical-screening/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-03-02 11:15:13.068</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Possible net harms of breast cancer screening: Updated modelling of Forrest report (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31313/possible-net-harms-of-breast-cancer-screening/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31313/possible-net-harms-of-breast-cancer-screening/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p id="p-7">Assesses the claims in other research that mammographic  breast cancer screening could be doing more harm than good by updating  the analysis in the Forrest report (a report published in 1986 that led to mammographic  breast cancer screening in the United  Kingdom).</p>
<p>Main outcome measures used were quality adjusted life years (QALYs), combining life years gained from  screening with losses of quality of life from false positive diagnoses  and surgery. Analysis showed that inclusion of the  effects of harms reduced the updated estimate of net cumulative QALYs  gained after 20 years from 3301 to 1536, or by more than half. Sensitivity analysis showed these results were robust to  a range of assumptions, particularly up to 10 years. It also indicated  the importance of the level and duration of harms from surgery. The author concludes that this analysis supports the claim that the introduction of breast cancer  screening might have caused net harm for up to 10 years after the start  of screening.</p>
<p>Raftery, J. (2011). Possible net harms of breast cancer screening: Updated modelling of Forrest report. <em>BMJ</em>, 343, d7627.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for access to a free full text version of the article, go to: <a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d7627" target="_blank">http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d7627</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-03-01 11:32:50.332</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Balancing harms and benefits of service mammography screening programs: A cohort study (Italy)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/30400/balancing-harms-and-benefits-of-service-mammography/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/30400/balancing-harms-and-benefits-of-service-mammography/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The aim of this Italian study was to define a balance sheet of benefits (breast cancer mortality    reduction) and harms (overdiagnosis) for mammography screening programmes. In total, 51,096 women aged 50-69 years were invited to a first screening    round (1991-1993) and followed-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality for a    median time of 15.4 and 16.5 years respectively. The estimate of mortality reduction    varied from 45% among 50-59 years old up to 51% among 60-69 years old. The estimate    of overdiagnosis was an additional 10%    of all breast cancer cases among 60-69 years old screened. The authors conclude that, comparing the breast cancer mortality and breast cancer incidence between attenders    and non-attenders, the overall cost to save one life corresponds    to no more than one overdiagnosed tumour (from 0.6 to 1 depending on the selection    criteria of the cohort).</p>
<p>Puliti, D., et al. (2012). Balancing harms and benefits of service mammography screening programs: A cohort study. <em>Breast Cancer Research</em>, 14 (R9), <span>doi:10.1186/bcr3090.</span></p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract, and for access to a free full text version of the article, go to: </span><a href="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/1/R9/abstract" target="_blank">http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/1/R9/abstract</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-01-10 10:58:37.346</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: An economic study</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/30386/the-impact-of-diabetes-prevention-on-labour/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/30386/the-impact-of-diabetes-prevention-on-labour/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>While the direct costs    of treating diabetes are substantial, and rising, the indirect costs are considered    greater. There is evidence that interventions to prevent diabetes are effective, and    cost-effective, but the impact on labour force participation and income has not been    assessed. This Australian study quantifies the potential impact of implementing a diabetes    prevention program, using screening and either metformin or a lifestyle intervention    on individual economic outcomes of pre-diabetic Australians aged 45-64.</p>
<p>Analysis found that an additional 753 person years in the labour force would have been achieved from 1993    to 2003 for the male cohort aged 60-64 years in 2003, if a lifestyle intervention    had been introduced in 1983; with 890 person years for the equivalent female group.    The impact on labour force participation was lower for the metformin intervention,    and increased with age for both interventions. The male cohort aged 60-64 years in    2003 would have earned an additional $30 million in income with the metformin intervention,    and the equivalent female cohort would have earned an additional $25 million. If the    lifestyle intervention was introduced, the same male and female cohorts would have    earned an additional $34 million and $28 million respectively from 1993 to 2003. For    the individuals involved, on average, males would have earned an additional $44,600 per    year and females an additional $31,800 per year, if they had continued to work as    a result of preventing diabetes.</p>
<p>Passey, M. E. (2012). The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: An economic study. <em>BMC Public Health</em>, 12 (16), <span>doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-16.</span></p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract, and for access to a free full text version of the article, go to: </span><a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/16/abstract" target="_blank">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/16/abstract</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-01-09 13:06:30.034</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Estimating the cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention programmes to prevent diabetes based on an example from Germany: Markov modelling</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/29573/estimating-the-cost-effectiveness-of-lifestyle/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/29573/estimating-the-cost-effectiveness-of-lifestyle/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) poses a large worldwide burden for health care systems.    One possible tool to decrease this burden is primary prevention. The aim of this German study was to investigate the long-term    cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention programmes for the prevention of T2D    using a Markov model with a probabilistic cohort analysis.</p>
<p>Results from the model indicated that diabetes prevention interventions have the potential to be    cost-effective, but the outcome reveals a high level of uncertainty. In particular, the interventions were found to be cost-saving    for men and women aged 30 or 50 years at the start of the intervention, and cost-effective    for men and women aged 70 years. However, there was also a high degree of uncertainty around    the incremental cost-effectiveness    ratios (ICERs).</p>
<p>Neumann, A., Schwarz, P., &amp; Lindholm, L. (2011). Estimating the cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention programmes to prevent diabetes based on an example from Germany: Markov modelling. <em>Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation</em>, 9 (17), <span>doi:10.1186/1478-7547-9-17.</span></p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract, and for access to a free full text version of the article, go to: </span><a href="http://www.resource-allocation.com/content/9/1/17/abstract">http://www.resource-allocation.com/content/9/1/17/abstract</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-11-22 11:11:01.217</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Health Economics (journal)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/29127/health-economics-journal/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/29127/health-economics-journal/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The journal,<em> Health Economics</em>, &nbsp;publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective.</p>
<p>Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-10-20 13:44:32.528</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/28957/cost-effectiveness-and-resource-allocation/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/28957/cost-effectiveness-and-resource-allocation/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation</em> is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-10-10 11:45:15.699</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Targeted versus universal prevention. A resource allocation model to prioritize cardiovascular prevention</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/28956/targeted-versus-universal-prevention-a-resource/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/28956/targeted-versus-universal-prevention-a-resource/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Diabetes mellitus brings an increased risk for cardiovascular complications and patients profit from prevention. This prevention also suits the general population. The question arises what is a better strategy: target the general population or diabetes patients.</p>
<p>A mathematical programming model was developed to calculate optimal allocations for the Dutch population of the following interventions: smoking cessation support, diet and exercise to reduce overweight, statins, and medication to reduce blood pressure. Outcomes were total lifetime health care costs and QALYs. Budget sizes were varied and the division of resources between the general population and diabetes patients was assessed.</p>
<p>Full implementation of all interventions resulted in a gain of 560,000 QALY at a cost of euro 640 per capita, about euro 12,900 per QALY on average. The large majority of these QALY gains could be obtained at incremental costs below euro 20,000 per QALY. Low or high budgets (below euro 9 or above euro 100 per capita) were predominantly spent in the general population. Moderate budgets were mostly spent in diabetes patients.</p>
<p>Conclusions:&nbsp;Major health gains can be realized efficiently by offering prevention to both the general and the diabetic population. However, a priori setting a specific distribution of resources is suboptimal. Resource allocation models allow accounting for capacity constraints and program size in addition to efficiency.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Feenstra, T.L., et al. (2011). Targeted versus universal prevention. A resource allocation model to prioritize cardiovascular prevention. <em>Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 9</em>:14</p>
<p>Available to read in free full text at: <a href="http://www.resource-allocation.com/content/9/1/14/abstract">http://www.resource-allocation.com/content/9/1/14/abstract</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-10-10 11:42:36.315</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of cardiovascular disease prevention in whole populations: Modelling study (England &amp; Wales)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/27500/effectiveness-and-cost-effectiveness-of-cardiovascular/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/27500/effectiveness-and-cost-effectiveness-of-cardiovascular/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This study, reported in<em> BMJ</em>, uses economic modelling analysis to estimate the potential cost effectiveness of a population-wide risk factor reduction programme aimed at preventing cardiovascular disease.</p>
<p>The authors created a spreadsheet model to quantify the reduction in cardiovascular disease in England and Wales over a decade, assuming the benefits apply consistently for men and women across age and risk groups.</p>
<p>The results of the analysis were that a programme across the entire population of England and Wales (about 50 million people) that reduced cardiovascular events by just 1% would result in savings to the health service worth at least &pound;30m (&euro;34m; $48m) a year compared with no additional intervention. Reducing mean cholesterol concentrations or blood pressure levels in the population by 5% (as already achieved by similar interventions in some other countries) would result in annual savings worth at least &pound;80m to &pound;100m. Legislation or other measures to reduce dietary salt intake by 3 g/day (current mean intake approximately 8.5 g/day) would prevent approximately 30&thinsp;000 cardiovascular events, with savings worth at least &pound;40m a year. Legislation to reduce intake of industrial trans fatty acid by approximately 0.5% of total energy content might gain around 570&thinsp;000 life years and generate NHS savings worth at least &pound;230m a year.</p>
<p>The authors conclude that any&nbsp;intervention that achieved even a modest population-wide reduction in any major cardiovascular risk factor would produce a net cost saving to the NHS, as well as improving health. They go on to say that, given the conservative assumptions used in this model, the true benefits would probably be greater.</p>
<p>Barton, P., et al. (2011). Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of cardiovascular disease prevention in whole populations: Modelling study. <em>BMJ, 343</em>:d4044</p>
<p>Available in full text at: <a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d4044.full">http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d4044.full</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-08-01 18:23:49.212</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Breast cancer screening for women aged 40 to 49 years - what does the evidence mean for New Zealand?</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26354/breast-cancer-screening-for-women-aged-40/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26354/breast-cancer-screening-for-women-aged-40/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-06-22 10:06:40.49</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Budget impact and cost-effectiveness of including a pentavalent rotavirus vaccine in the New Zealand childhood immunization schedule</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26317/budget-impact-and-cost-effectiveness-of-including/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26317/budget-impact-and-cost-effectiveness-of-including/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-06-20 15:26:37.931</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Promoting continuity of care in general practice (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26057/promoting-continuity-of-care-in-general-practice/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26057/promoting-continuity-of-care-in-general-practice/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Promoting Continuity of Care in General Practice</em> outlines the evidence of the cost-effectiveness of general practice, citing the fact that one day&rsquo;s GP care is equivalent in cost to one tenth of a day in hospital.</p>
<p>It also makes the important link between access and continuity of care &ndash; with&nbsp; evidence that patients are actually willing to wait longer to see their preferred clinician &ndash; and suggests ways of helping patients achieve effective &lsquo;therapeutic&rsquo; relationships.</p>
<p>The report defines Continuity of Care as being &lsquo;about care experienced by individual patients &ndash; not populations &ndash; over time&rsquo;, and identifies two specific types:</p>
<p><strong>Relationship Continuity</strong><br /> Describes the doctor-patient relationship in its most basic sense.</p>
<p><strong>Management Continuity</strong><br /> Describes co-ordination and co-operation between service providers to enable the patient to navigate the healthcare system as simply as possible.</p>
<p>The report makes 30 recommendations to policy-makers, managers and commissioners, and practices.</p>
<p>The report is available in full text at: <a href="http://www.rcgp.org.uk/pdf/RCGP_Continuity_of_Care.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.rcgp.org.uk/pdf/RCGP_Continuity_of_Care.pdf</a></p>
<p>Hill, A.P. &amp; Freeman, G.K. (2011). <em>Promoting continuity of care in general practice.</em> London: Royal College of General Practitioners.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-06-14 12:08:45.821</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The effectiveness of television advertising campaigns on generating calls to a national Quitline by Maori</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/25922/the-effectiveness-of-television-advertising/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/25922/the-effectiveness-of-television-advertising/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-06-10 11:24:37.575</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The cost of immunising at the general practice level</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/25784/the-cost-of-immunising-at-the-general-practice/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/25784/the-cost-of-immunising-at-the-general-practice/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-06-07 11:33:33.401</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>What is the cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C treatment for injecting drug users on methadone maintenance in New Zealand?</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/25620/what-is-the-cost-effectiveness-of-hepatitis/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/25620/what-is-the-cost-effectiveness-of-hepatitis/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-06-01 14:09:34.121</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Lifetime health effects and medical costs of integrated stroke services (Netherlands)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/24929/lifetime-health-effects-and-medical-costs/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/24929/lifetime-health-effects-and-medical-costs/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Economic evaluation of stroke services indicates that such services may lead to improved quality of life at affordable cost.    This study, reported in <em><em>Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation</em>, </em>assesses lifetime health impact and cost consequences of stroke in an integrated service setting.</p>
<p>The EDISSE study is a prospective non-randomized controlled cluster  trial that compared stroke services (n = 151 patients)    to usual care (n = 187 patients). Health status and cost trial-data  were entered in multi-dimensional stroke life-tables.    The tables distinguish four levels of disability which are defined by  the modified Rankin scale. Quality-of-life scores (EuroQoL-5D),    transition and survival probabilities are based on concurrent Dutch  follow-up studies. Outcomes are quality-adjusted life    years lived and lifetime medical cost by disability category. An  economic analysis compares outcomes from a successful stroke    service to usual care, by bootstrapping individual costs and effects  data from patients in each arm.</p>
<p>Results: Lifetime costs and QALYs after stroke depend on age-of-onset of  first-ever stroke. Lifetime QALYs after stroke are 2.42 (90%    CI - 0.49 - 2.75) for male patients in usual care and 2.75 (-0.61;  6.26) for females. Lifetime costs for men in the usual    care setting are &euro;39,335 (15,951; 79,837) and &euro;42,944 (14,081;  95,944) for women. A comparison with the stroke service results    in an ICER of &euro;11,685 saved per QALY gained (&euro;14,211 and &euro;7,745 for  men and women respectively). This stroke service is with    90% certainty cost-effective.</p>
<p>The authors conclude that, their analysis shows the potential of large health benefits and cost savings of stroke services, taking a lifetime perspective,    also in other European settings.</p>
<p>Baeten, S. A., et al. (2011). Lifetime health effects and medical costs of integrated stroke services - a non-randomized controlled cluster-trial based life table approach. <em><em>Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation,</em></em>&nbsp; 8(21),&nbsp; <span>doi:10.1186/1478-7547-8-21</span></p>
<p><span>This article is available free in full text at: </span><a href="http://www.resource-allocation.com/content/8/1/21">http://www.resource-allocation.com/content/8/1/21</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-04-18 21:43:43.587</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Practice nurse cost benefit analysis: Report to the Ministry of Health</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/22468/practice-nurse-cost-benefit-analysis-report/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/22468/practice-nurse-cost-benefit-analysis-report/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2010-11-10 11:47:39.856</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Waiting for hip arthroplasty: Economic costs and health outcomes</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/16793/waiting-for-hip-arthroplasty-economic-costs/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/16793/waiting-for-hip-arthroplasty-economic-costs/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2010-05-24 12:21:30.265</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Utilisation of dental auxiliaries: Attitudinal review from six developed countries</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/16240/utilisation-of-dental-auxiliaries-attitudinal/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/16240/utilisation-of-dental-auxiliaries-attitudinal/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2010-05-11 16:11:44.905</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The effectiveness, acceptability and costs of a hospital-at-home service compared with acute hospital care: A randomized controlled trial</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/17288/the-effectiveness-acceptability-and-costs/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/17288/the-effectiveness-acceptability-and-costs/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2010-05-11 12:26:43.811</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Benefits and risks of orthodontic treatment: Report of the 2005 NZAO Symposium</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/15858/benefits-and-risks-of-orthodontic-treatment/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/15858/benefits-and-risks-of-orthodontic-treatment/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2010-05-04 11:07:35.927</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Value for money - recasting the problem in terms of dynamic access prioritisation</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/15481/value-for-money-recasting-the-problem-in/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/15481/value-for-money-recasting-the-problem-in/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2010-04-28 13:16:00.634</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Avoidable hospitalisations: Potential for primary and public health initiatives in Canterbury, New Zealand</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/15042/avoidable-hospitalisations-potential-for/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/15042/avoidable-hospitalisations-potential-for/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2010-04-20 11:35:45.288</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The development and implementation of the Chronic Care Management Programme in Counties Manukau</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/14975/the-development-and-implementation-of-the/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/14975/the-development-and-implementation-of-the/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2010-04-19 22:33:49.641</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Stroke rehabilitation services to accelerate hospital discharge and provide home-based care: An overview and cost analysis</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/17287/stroke-rehabilitation-services-to-accelerate/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/17287/stroke-rehabilitation-services-to-accelerate/
?tag=costbenefitanalysis&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2010-04-19 16:19:29.866</pubDate>
					</item>
				
			
	</channel>
</rss>
