<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>
			
			
				
			
			Health Improvement and Innovation Resource Centre
		</title>
		<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://www.hiirc.org.nz/site.rss
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<language>en</language>
		<copyright>2009-2018 hiirc.org.nz</copyright>
		
		
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Analysis of medicine prices in New Zealand and 16 European countries</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/56765/analysis-of-medicine-prices-in-new-zealand/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/56765/analysis-of-medicine-prices-in-new-zealand/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-06-22 09:05:39.258</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>From regulatory approval to subsidized patient access in the Asia-Pacific region: A comparison of systems across Australia, China, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, Taiwan, and Thailand</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/56180/from-regulatory-approval-to-subsidized-patient/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/56180/from-regulatory-approval-to-subsidized-patient/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>In this paper, the authors "... compare processes and timings of regulatory and subsidized access systems for medicines across seven jurisdictions within the Asia-Pacific region".</span></p>
<p><span><span>Available to read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2015.03.013" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2015.03.013</a></span><span>&nbsp;</span></span></p>
<p><span>Cook, G. &amp; Kim, H. (2015).&nbsp;From regulatory approval to subsidized patient access in the Asia-Pacific region: A comparison of systems across Australia, China, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, Taiwan, and Thailand.&nbsp;<em>Value in Health Regional Issues,&nbsp;6</em>, 40&ndash;45.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-05-26 12:08:33.959</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Building primary care in a changing Europe: Case studies</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/55939/building-primary-care-in-a-changing-europe/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/55939/building-primary-care-in-a-changing-europe/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This report contains structured case studies summarising the state of primary care in 31 European countries. It complements a previous study, <a href="http://www.euro.who.int/en/about-us/partners/observatory/publications/studies/building-primary-care-in-a-changing-europe" target="_blank"><em>Building primary care in a changing Europe</em></a>, which provided an overview of the state of primary care across the continent, including aspects of governance, financing, workforce and details of service profiles.</p>
<p>These case studies establish the context of primary care in each country; the key governance and economic conditions; the development of the primary care workforce; how primary care services are delivered; and an assessment of the quality and efficiency of the primary-care system.</p>
<p>The report is available to download and read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.euro.who.int/en/about-us/partners/observatory/publications/studies/building-primary-care-in-a-changing-europe-case-studies" target="_blank">http://www.euro.who.int/en/about-us/partners/observatory/publications/studies/building-primary-care-in-a-changing-europe-case-studies</a></p>
<p>Kringos, D., et al. (2015).&nbsp;<em>Building primary care in a changing Europe: Case studies</em>. Brussels:&nbsp;European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-05-18 10:54:36.684</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Public hospital governance in Asia and Pacific</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/55938/public-hospital-governance-in-asia-and-pacific/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/55938/public-hospital-governance-in-asia-and-pacific/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The Asia Pacific Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (APO) launched an initiative in 2013 to undertake an in-depth analysis of public hospital governance. A two-stage project was initiated with the following objectives: 1. to describe the policy context, recent policy developments and reforms in regard to public hospital governance and performance; 2. to describe and assess publicly-owned hospital governance and performance in selected countries; and 3. to contribute to comparative analyses across different country settings on public hospital governance and performance (stage 2).</p>
<p>This volume reports on the first stage of the project, presenting results from a series of country case studies produced by national authors from seven countries in the region, including New Zealand.&nbsp;</p>
<p>To read the document, go to: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.wpro.who.int/asia_pacific_observatory/country_comparative_studies/ccs_public_hospital_governance/en/" target="_blank">http://www.wpro.who.int/asia_pacific_observatory/country_comparative_studies/ccs_public_hospital_governance/en/</a></p>
<p>Asia Pacific Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (2015).&nbsp;Public health governance in Asia and Pacific. D. Huntington &amp; K. Hort (Eds.).&nbsp;<em>Comparative Country Studies, 1</em>(1).</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-05-18 10:31:59.202</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Faculty of Radiation Oncology 2014 Workforce Census: A comparison of New Zealand and Australian responses</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/55118/faculty-of-radiation-oncology-2014-workforce/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/55118/faculty-of-radiation-oncology-2014-workforce/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-04-17 09:34:08.928</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Demographic and epidemiologic drivers of global cardiovascular mortality</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54800/demographic-and-epidemiologic-drivers-of/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54800/demographic-and-epidemiologic-drivers-of/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>In this study, the authors used data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 to investigate the effects of population growth, population growth and aging, and epidemiologic changes in disease,<span>&nbsp;on trends in cardiovascular mortality</span>&nbsp;from 1990 to 2013.&nbsp;</p>
<p>They conclude that "<span>the aging and growth of the population resulted in an increase in global cardiovascular deaths between 1990 and 2013, despite a decrease in age-specific death rates in most regions. Only Central and Western Europe had gains in cardiovascular health that were sufficient to offset these demographic forces".&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1406656" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1056/NEJMoa1406656</span></a><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>Roth, G.A., et al. (2015).&nbsp;Demographic and epidemiologic drivers of global cardiovascular mortality. <em>The New England Journal of Medicine,&nbsp;372</em>:1333-1341.</span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-04-07 09:17:05.401</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Outcome comparison of very preterm infants cared for in the neonatal intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand and in Canada</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54774/outcome-comparison-of-very-preterm-infants/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54774/outcome-comparison-of-very-preterm-infants/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-04-02 12:44:40.115</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>How does the NHS compare with health systems in other countries? (Including New Zealand)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54434/how-does-the-nhs-compare-with-health-systems/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54434/how-does-the-nhs-compare-with-health-systems/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This overview, published by the Health Foundation in March 2015, looks at the use of international comparisons, and examines how the UK health services compare with other countries&rsquo; health systems (including New Zealand) in a number of areas.</p>
<p>The key themes are:&nbsp;equity of access to care;&nbsp;timeliness, person-centredness and safety;&nbsp;efficiency of care;&nbsp;effectiveness of care.</p>
<p>The overview is available to read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.health.org.uk/publications/how-does-the-nhs-compare-with-health-systems-in-other-countries/" target="_blank">http://www.health.org.uk/publications/how-does-the-nhs-compare-with-health-systems-in-other-countries/</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-03-22 14:59:26.271</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Socioeconomic status in relation to cardiovascular disease and cause-specific mortality: A comparison of Asian and Australasian populations in a pooled analysis</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54398/socioeconomic-status-in-relation-to-cardiovascular/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54398/socioeconomic-status-in-relation-to-cardiovascular/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-03-19 11:26:46.389</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Global trends and projections for tobacco use, 1990–2025: An analysis of smoking indicators from the WHO Comprehensive Information Systems for Tobacco Control</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54264/global-trends-and-projections-for-tobacco/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54264/global-trends-and-projections-for-tobacco/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>In an analysis of data for tobacco smoking prevalence from nationally representative survey data, the authors provide estimates of recent trends in tobacco smoking, projections for future tobacco smoking, and country-level estimates of probabilities of achieving tobacco smoking targets.</span></p>
<p>Access to the full text of the articles is&nbsp;free&nbsp;but&nbsp;registration is required on the&nbsp;Lancet&nbsp;site.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract and f</span>or information on how to access the full text, go to: &nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)60264-1/fulltext" target="_blank">http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)60264-1/fulltext</a></p>
<p><span>Bilano, V., et al. (2015).&nbsp;Global trends and projections for tobacco use, 1990&ndash;2025: An analysis of smoking indicators from the WHO Comprehensive Information Systems for Tobacco Control. <em>The Lancet,&nbsp;385</em>(9972), 966&ndash;976.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-03-16 09:13:03.179</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Painting a picture of trans-Tasman mortality</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54183/painting-a-picture-of-trans-tasman-mortality/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54183/painting-a-picture-of-trans-tasman-mortality/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-03-11 09:29:57.36</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>International primary care snapshots: New Zealand and Japan</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54004/international-primary-care-snapshots-new/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54004/international-primary-care-snapshots-new/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>In this article, published in the B<em>ritish Journal of General Practice</em>, Felicity Goodyear-Smith, Ryuki Kassai provide overviews of the primary care systems in Japan and New Zealand.</p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15X684109" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.3399/bjgp15X684109</span></a><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-03-09 09:30:13.314</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>How many cancer deaths could New Zealand avoid if five-year relative survival ratios were the same as in Australia?</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/53769/how-many-cancer-deaths-could-new-zealand/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/53769/how-many-cancer-deaths-could-new-zealand/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-02-26 14:34:18.177</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>International profiles of health care systems 2014, including New Zealand, published by the Commonwealth Fund</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52923/international-profiles-of-health-care-systems/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52923/international-profiles-of-health-care-systems/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This publication presents overviews of the health care systems of Australia, Canada, Denmark, England, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States. </span></p>
<p><span>Each overview covers health insurance, public and private financing, health system organization and governance, health care quality and coordination, disparities, efficiency and integration, use of information technology and evidence-based practice, cost containment, and recent reforms and innovations. </span></p>
<p><span>In addition, summary tables provide data on a number of key health system characteristics and performance indicators, including overall health care spending, hospital spending and utilization, health care access, patient safety, care coordination, chronic care management, disease prevention, capacity for quality improvement, and public views.</span></p>
<p><span>To read the report in full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2015/jan/international-profiles-2014" target="_blank">http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2015/jan/international-profiles-2014</a></span><a href="http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/files/publications/fund-report/2015/jan/1802_mossialos_intl_profiles_2014_v3.pdf?la=en"><br /></a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-01-26 09:38:09.796</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Closing the gaps in child health in the Pacific: An achievable goal in the next 20 years</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52922/closing-the-gaps-in-child-health-in-the-pacific/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52922/closing-the-gaps-in-child-health-in-the-pacific/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>"Currently, Australia and New Zealand have child mortality rates of 5 and 6 per 1000 live births, respectively, while Pacific island developing nations have under 5 mortality rates ranging from 13 to 16 (Vanuatu, Fiji and Tonga) to 47 and 58 per 1000 live births (Kiribati and Papua New Guinea, respectively). However, these Pacific child mortality rates are falling, by an average of 1.4% per year since 1990, and more rapidly (1.9% per year) since 2000. Based on progress elsewhere, there is a need to (i) define the specific things needed to close the gaps in child health; (ii) be far more ambitious and hopeful than ever before; and (iii) form a new regional compact based on solidarity and interdependence".</span></p>
<p><span>This review article is open access and available to read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12804" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1111/jpc.12804</span></a></span></p>
<p><span><span>Duke, T., Kado, J. H., Auto, J., Amini, J. and Gilbert, K. (2015). Closing the gaps in child health in the Pacific: An achievable goal in the next 20 years. <em>Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 51</em>:&nbsp;54&ndash;60.&nbsp;</span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-01-26 09:14:04.499</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Herpes zoster (shingles) at a large New Zealand general practice: Incidence over 5 years</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52343/herpes-zoster-shingles-at-a-large-new-zealand/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52343/herpes-zoster-shingles-at-a-large-new-zealand/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-19 09:46:13.903</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Comparison of cancer survival in New Zealand and Australia, 2006–2010</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52335/comparison-of-cancer-survival-in-new-zealand/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52335/comparison-of-cancer-survival-in-new-zealand/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-19 09:01:22.05</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The effect of MPOWER on smoking prevalence</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52188/the-effect-of-mpower-on-smoking-prevalence/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52188/the-effect-of-mpower-on-smoking-prevalence/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<div id="sec-1">
<p id="p-1">Using WHO's Reports on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, the authors analysed&nbsp;the effect of varying levels of comprehensive tobacco control&nbsp;(2008 MPOWER composite score) on&nbsp;tobacco smoking between 2006 and 2009&nbsp;in a global context.</p>
</div>
<div id="sec-3">
<p id="p-3">Based on their analysis, the authors conclude that "higher&nbsp;levels of MPOWER combined, as well as continued and frequent monitoring of tobacco use ... and increasing taxation ..., were associated with a decrease in current tobacco smoking over time".</p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051834" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051834</span></a></span><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>
<p><span>Dubray, J., et al. (2014). The effect of MPOWER on smoking prevalence. <em>Tobacco Control, 9 December</em> [Epub before print].</span></p>
</div>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-15 09:11:25.576</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Accounting for differences in cognitive health between older adults in New Zealand and the USA</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52129/accounting-for-differences-in-cognitive-health/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52129/accounting-for-differences-in-cognitive-health/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-11 15:11:21.614</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Global Diabetes Scorecard (International Diabetes Federation)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52029/global-diabetes-scorecard-international-diabetes/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52029/global-diabetes-scorecard-international-diabetes/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The <em>Global Diabetes Scorecard</em> enables the global diabetes community to track and report progress on diabetes, to highlight areas of good practice and to identify areas that may need targeted advocacy to encourage government action. The Scorecard is an International Diabetes Federation (IDF) publication.</span></p>
<p>The Scorecard&nbsp;measures progress on the&nbsp;Political Declaration on the Prevention&nbsp;and Control of Non-communicable Diseases (NCDs) adopted by UN member states in 2011 as well as other&nbsp;global diabetes commitments and priorities.&nbsp;The Scorecard contains the views of IDF&rsquo;s Member&nbsp;Associations on how far their national governments&nbsp;have progressed by December 2013 and sets the&nbsp;baseline for future monitoring.</p>
<p><span>To download the&nbsp;<em>Global Diabetes Scorecard&nbsp;</em>in full text, go to: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.idf.org/global-diabetes-scorecard/" target="_blank">http://www.idf.org/global-diabetes-scorecard/</a></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-09 10:28:24.671</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009 (25,676,887 patients from 67 countries) reveal wide differences between countries</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52017/global-surveillance-of-cancer-survival-1995/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52017/global-surveillance-of-cancer-survival-1995/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The authors aimed to initiate worldwide surveillance of cancer survival by central analysis of population-based registry data, as a metric of the effectiveness of health systems, and to inform global policy on cancer control.</p>
<p>Individual tumour records were submitted by 279 population-based cancer registries in 67 countries <span>&nbsp;(including from New Zealand)&nbsp;</span>for 25&middot;7 million adults (age 15&mdash;99 years) and 75 000 children (age 0&mdash;14 years) diagnosed with cancer during 1995&mdash;2009 and followed up to Dec 31, 2009, or later.&nbsp;</p>
<p>5-year survival from colon, rectal, and breast cancers has increased steadily in most developed countries. For patients diagnosed during 2005&mdash;09, survival for colon and rectal cancer reached 60% or more in 22 countries around the world; for breast cancer, 5-year survival rose to 85% or higher in 17 countries worldwide. Liver and lung cancer remain lethal in all nations: for both cancers, 5-year survival is below 20% everywhere in Europe, in the range 15&mdash;19% in North America, and as low as 7&mdash;9% in Mongolia and Thailand.</p>
<p>Striking rises in 5-year survival from prostate cancer have occurred in many countries: survival rose by 10&mdash;20% between 1995&mdash;99 and 2005&mdash;09 in 22 countries in South America, Asia, and Europe, but survival still varies widely around the world, from less than 60% in Bulgaria and Thailand to 95% or more in Brazil, Puerto Rico, and the USA. For cervical cancer, national estimates of 5-year survival range from less than 50% to more than 70%; regional variations are much wider, and improvements between 1995&mdash;99 and 2005&mdash;09 have generally been slight. For women diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2005&mdash;09, 5-year survival was 40% or higher only in Ecuador, the USA, and 17 countries in Asia and Europe. 5-year survival for stomach cancer in 2005&mdash;09 was high (54&mdash;58%) in Japan and South Korea, compared with less than 40% in other countries. By contrast, 5-year survival from adult leukaemia in Japan and South Korea (18&mdash;23%) is lower than in most other countries. 5-year survival from childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia is less than 60% in several countries, but as high as 90% in Canada and four European countries, which suggests major deficiencies in the management of a largely curable disease.</p>
<p>The authors conclude that these trends reveal&nbsp;very wide differences, which are likely to be attributable to differences in access to early diagnosis and optimum treatment.&nbsp;</p>
<p>This is an open access article and can be read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62038-9" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62038-9</span></a></p>
<p><span>Allemani, C., et al. (2015).&nbsp;Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995&mdash;2009: Analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2).&nbsp;<em>The Lancet,&nbsp;385</em>(9972), 977&ndash;1010.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-09 06:51:59.137</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>WHO position paper on mammography screening</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51939/who-position-paper-on-mammography-screening/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51939/who-position-paper-on-mammography-screening/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This World Health Organization position paper examines the balance of benefits and harms in offering mammography screening to women after the age of 40 in a variety of settings.</span></p>
<p><span>The paper can be downloaded and read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.who.int/cancer/publications/mammography_screening/en/" target="_blank">http://www.who.int/cancer/publications/mammography_screening/en/</a></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-04 13:25:01.781</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The global burden of myocarditis. Part 1: A systematic literature review for the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors 2010 Study</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51870/the-global-burden-of-myocarditis-part-1-a/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51870/the-global-burden-of-myocarditis-part-1-a/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>A writing group convened by the GBD 2010 (Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries and Risk Factors) Study systematically reviewed the literature on myocarditis, and developed a disease model.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>This article is available to read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.globalheart-journal.com/article/S2211-8160(14)00019-2/fulltext" target="_blank">http://www.globalheart-journal.com/article/S2211-8160(14)00019-2/fulltext</a></p>
<p>Cooper, L.T., et al. (2014). The global burden of myocarditis. Part 1: A systematic literature review for the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors 2010 Study.&nbsp;<em>Global Heart,&nbsp;9</em>(1), <span>121&ndash;129</span>.</p>
<p><span>&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-02 13:45:27.887</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Global and regional burden of aortic dissection and aneurysms  Mortality trends in 21 world regions, 1990 to 2010</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51853/global-and-regional-burden-of-aortic-dissection/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51853/global-and-regional-burden-of-aortic-dissection/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The authors estimated <span>aortic aneurysm (AA)</span>&nbsp;regional deaths and years of life lost in 21 regions worldwide for 1990 and 2010. They used the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2010 study causes of death database and the cause of death ensemble modeling approach to assess levels and trends of AA deaths by age, sex, and GBD region.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>This article is available to read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.globalheart-journal.com/article/S2211-8160(13)00213-5/fulltext" target="_blank">http://www.globalheart-journal.com/article/S2211-8160(13)00213-5/fulltext</a></p>
<p>Sampson, U.K.A., et al. (2014). Global and regional burden of aortic dissection and aneurysms &nbsp;Mortality trends in 21 world regions, 1990 to 2010.&nbsp;<em>Global Heart,&nbsp;9</em>(1), <span>171&ndash;180.e10</span>.</p>
<p><span>&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-02 10:24:51.443</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Global and regional burden of infective endocarditis, 1990–2010: A systematic review of the literature</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51851/global-and-regional-burden-of-infective-endocarditis/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51851/global-and-regional-burden-of-infective-endocarditis/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The GBD 2010 (Global Burden of Disease, Injuries, and Risk Factors) study <span>infective endocarditis (IE)</span>&nbsp;expert group conducted a systematic review of IE epidemiology literature to inform estimates of the burden on IE in 21 world regions in 1990 and 2010.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>This article is available to read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.globalheart-journal.com/article/S2211-8160(14)00014-3/fulltext" target="_blank">http://www.globalheart-journal.com/article/S2211-8160(14)00014-3/fulltext</a></p>
<p>Bin Abdulhak, A.A., et al. (2014). Global and regional burden of infective endocarditis, 1990&ndash;2010:&nbsp;A Systematic Review of the Literature.&nbsp;<em>Global Heart,&nbsp;9</em>(1), 131-143.</p>
<p><span>&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-02 10:01:01.942</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Global burden of atrial fibrillation in developed and developing nations</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51810/global-burden-of-atrial-fibrillation-in-developed/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51810/global-burden-of-atrial-fibrillation-in-developed/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>&nbsp;In this review, the authors identify issues that are unique to developed versus developing regions and outline a road map for possible approaches to surveillance, management, and prevention of atrial fibrillation at the global level.</span></p>
<p><span>This article is available to read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.globalheart-journal.com/article/S2211-8160(14)00016-7/fulltext" target="_blank">http://www.globalheart-journal.com/article/S2211-8160(14)00016-7/fulltext</a></span></p>
<p>Bennett, D. A., et al. (2014). The global burden of hemorrhagic stroke: &nbsp;A summary of findings from the GBD 2010 Study.&nbsp;<em>Global Heart,&nbsp;9</em>(1), 113-119.</p>
<p><span>&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span>&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-01 09:42:19.956</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The global burden of hemorrhagic stroke:  A summary of findings from the GBD 2010 Study</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51809/the-global-burden-of-hemorrhagic-stroke-a/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51809/the-global-burden-of-hemorrhagic-stroke-a/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This report summarizes the findings of the GBD 2010 (Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors) study for hemorrhagic stroke (HS).&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gheart.2014.01.003" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gheart.2014.01.003</a>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</p>
<p>Bennett, D. A., et al. (2014). The global burden of hemorrhagic stroke: &nbsp;A summary of findings from the GBD 2010 Study.&nbsp;<em>Global Heart,&nbsp;9</em>(1), 101-106.</p>
<p><span>&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-01 09:38:52.914</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The global burden of ischemic stroke: Findings of the GBD 2010 Study, including the impact of tobacco smoking as a risk factor</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51807/the-global-burden-of-ischemic-stroke-findings/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51807/the-global-burden-of-ischemic-stroke-findings/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>In this article, the authors summarise the findings of the GBD 2010 (Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors) study for ischemic stroke (IS) and report the impact of tobacco smoking on IS burden in specific countries.</span></p>
<p><span><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gheart.2014.01.001" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gheart.2014.01.001</a></span><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>Bennett, D. A., et al. (2014).&nbsp;The global burden of ischemic stroke: Findings of the GBD 2010 Study. <em>Global Heart,&nbsp;9</em>(1), 107&ndash;112.</span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-01 09:17:07.613</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Most Asia/Pacific countries need to improve affordable access to healthcare, says OECD</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51784/most-asia-pacific-countries-need-to-improve/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51784/most-asia-pacific-countries-need-to-improve/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Most countries in the Asia/Pacific region need to step up their efforts to give more people access to affordable, quality health care. Too many people, especially women, cannot get the medical treatment they need due to high costs, difficulties in getting permission to see a doctor or a lack of health care providers in rural areas, according to a new OECD report.</p>
<p>Despite these issues,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.oecd.org/health/health-at-a-glance-asia-pacific-23054964.htm" target="_blank">Health at a Glance Asia/Pacific 2014</a>&nbsp;reveals that life expectancy at birth across 22 Asian countries reached 73.4 years on average in 2012, a gain of about seven years since 1990. In comparison, OECD countries gained 5.3 years during the same period.</p>
<p>But a large regional divide persists: the country with the longest life expectancy is Hong Kong, China with 83.3 years for both men and women. Japan, Australia, Singapore, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea and Macau, China also exceeded 80 years for total life expectancy.</p>
<p>In contrast, eleven countries in the Asia/Pacific region had total life expectancies of less than 70 years, and in Papua New Guinea and Myanmar, a child born in 2012 can expect to live an average of less than or equal to 65 years of life.</p>
<p>The report also reveals the high prevalence of diabetes in Asia/Pacific, which accounted for over 60% of the 5.1 million deaths worldwide caused by the disease in 2013. About 215 million people live with diabetes in the region and half of them are undiagnosed and unaware of developing long-term complications.</p>
<p>To read the full media release from the OECD, go to: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/asia-pacific-countries-need-to-improve-affordable-access-to-healthcare.htm" target="_blank">http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/asia-pacific-countries-need-to-improve-affordable-access-to-healthcare.htm</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-11-28 12:04:40.369</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Health at a Glance: Asia/Pacific 2014</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51783/health-at-a-glance-asia-pacific-2014/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51783/health-at-a-glance-asia-pacific-2014/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This third edition of Health at a Glance Asia/Pacific presents a set of key indicators of health status, the determinants of health, health care resources and utilisation, health care expenditure and financing and health care quality across 27 Asia/Pacific countries and economies, including New Zealand.</span></p>
<p><span><span>The report is available to read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.oecd.org/health/health-at-a-glance-asia-pacific-23054964.htm" target="_blank">http://www.oecd.org/health/health-at-a-glance-asia-pacific-23054964.htm</a></span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-11-28 12:01:20.142</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995—2009: Analysis of individual data from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (including New Zealand) (CONCORD-2)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51723/global-surveillance-of-cancer-survival-1995/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51723/global-surveillance-of-cancer-survival-1995/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>In this study, the authors aimed to initiate worldwide surveillance of cancer survival by central analysis of population-based registry data, as a metric of the effectiveness of health systems, and to inform global policy on cancer control.</p>
<p>Individual tumour records were submitted by 279 population-based cancer registries in 67 countries for 25&middot;7 million adults (age 15&mdash;99 years) and 75 000 children (age 0&mdash;14 years) diagnosed with cancer during 1995&mdash;2009 and followed up to Dec 31, 2009, or later. The authors looked at cancers of the stomach, colon, rectum, liver, lung, breast (women), cervix, ovary, and prostate in adults, and adult and childhood leukaemia.&nbsp;</p>
<p>5-year survival from colon, rectal, and breast cancers has increased steadily in most developed countries. For patients diagnosed during 2005&mdash;09, survival for colon and rectal cancer reached 60% or more in 22 countries around the world; for breast cancer, 5-year survival rose to 85% or higher in 17 countries worldwide. Liver and lung cancer remain lethal in all nations: for both cancers, 5-year survival is below 20% everywhere in Europe, in the range 15&mdash;19% in North America, and as low as 7&mdash;9% in Mongolia and Thailand. Striking rises in 5-year survival from prostate cancer have occurred in many countries: survival rose by 10&mdash;20% between 1995&mdash;99 and 2005&mdash;09 in 22 countries in South America, Asia, and Europe, but survival still varies widely around the world, from less than 60% in Bulgaria and Thailand to 95% or more in Brazil, Puerto Rico, and the USA. For cervical cancer, national estimates of 5-year survival range from less than 50% to more than 70%; regional variations are much wider, and improvements between 1995&mdash;99 and 2005&mdash;09 have generally been slight. For women diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2005&mdash;09, 5-year survival was 40% or higher only in Ecuador, the USA, and 17 countries in Asia and Europe. 5-year survival for stomach cancer in 2005&mdash;09 was high (54&mdash;58%) in Japan and South Korea, compared with less than 40% in other countries. By contrast, 5-year survival from adult leukaemia in Japan and South Korea (18&mdash;23%) is lower than in most other countries. 5-year survival from childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia is less than 60% in several countries, but as high as 90% in Canada and four European countries, which suggests major deficiencies in the management of a largely curable disease.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and can be read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62038-9" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62038-9</span></a></p>
<p>Allemani, C., et al. (2015).&nbsp;Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995&mdash;2009: Analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2). <em>The Lancet,&nbsp;385</em>(9972), 977&ndash;1010.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-11-26 14:16:33.703</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cigarette package health warnings: International status report (4th edition)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38397/cigarette-package-health-warnings-international/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38397/cigarette-package-health-warnings-international/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This updated report, published by the Canada Cancer Society in 2014, provides an international overview, ranking 198 countries/jurisdictions based on warning size, and also lists those that have finalised requirements for picture warnings. Regional breakdowns are also provided.</p>
<p>The report is available to read in full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Cigarette-Package-Health-Warnings-International-Status-Report-English-CCS-Sept-2014.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Cigarette-Package-Health-Warnings-International-Status-Report-English-CCS-Sept-2014.pdf</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-11-25 09:26:30.71</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Multinational comparisons of health systems data, 2014</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51602/multinational-comparisons-of-health-systems/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51602/multinational-comparisons-of-health-systems/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<div class="body">
<p class="first">In this chartbook, the author uses data collected by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and other agencies to compare health care systems and performance on a range of topics, including spending, hospitals, physicians, pharmaceuticals, prevention, mortality, quality and safety, and prices.</p>
</div>
<div class="body">
<p class="first">Data is presented across several industrialised countries: Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Japan, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States.</p>
</div>
<div id="body" class="body">
<div class="body">&nbsp;</div>
<div id="body" class="body">
<p>Available to read at: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/chartbooks/2014/multinational-comparisons-of-health-systems-data-2014" target="_blank">http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/chartbooks/2014/multinational-comparisons-of-health-systems-data-2014</a></p>
<p>Anderson, C. (2014).&nbsp;<em>Multinational Comparisons of Health Systems Data, 2014</em>. The Commonwealth Fund.</p>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-11-21 11:29:12.07</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>International survey of older adults (including New Zealand) investigates access, coordination, and patient-centered care</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51601/international-survey-of-older-adults-including/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51601/international-survey-of-older-adults-including/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The Commonwealth Fund surveyed adults age 65 or older in 11 countries to understand how well health systems are caring for older adults, where the gaps in performance are, and how policy reforms can make a difference.</span></p>
<p>The authors report on&nbsp;health and health care use;&nbsp;<span>health care costs and access;&nbsp;<span>timeliness of care;&nbsp;<span>care coordination and safety;&nbsp;<span>doctor-patient relationship;&nbsp;<span>health promotion;&nbsp;<span>end-of-life planning; and&nbsp;<span>management of chronic conditions and caregiving.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span><span><span><span><span><span><span>The article is available to read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0947" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0947</span></a></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span>Osborn, R., et al. (2014). International survey of older adults investigates access, coordination, and patient-centered care. <em>Health Affiars,&nbsp;33</em>(12), 2247-2255</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span>&nbsp;</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<div>&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-11-21 11:20:06.065</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>International perspectives on radiology practice metrics: Australia, France, Germany, Japan, New Zealand, Spain, the UK and USA</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51306/international-perspectives-on-radiology-practice/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51306/international-perspectives-on-radiology-practice/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>In this white paper from the International Economic Committee, the authors examine baseline, structural and and statistical differences in radiologic practice among&nbsp;Australia, France, Germany, Japan, New Zealand, Spain, the UK and USA.</p>
<p><span>To read the first page, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.031" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.031</a></span><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>
<p><span>Lexa, F.J., et al. (2014).&nbsp;International perspectives on radiology practice metrics: Australia, France, Germany, Japan, New Zealand, Spain, the UK and USA.&nbsp;<em>Journal of the American College of Radiology,&nbsp;11</em>(11), 1081&ndash;1086.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-11-10 14:25:47.708</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Trends in e-cigarette awareness, trial, and use under the different regulatory environments of Australia and the UK</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51128/trends-in-e-cigarette-awareness-trial-and/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51128/trends-in-e-cigarette-awareness-trial-and/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>In this article, the&nbsp;<span>authors compare patterns of e-cigarettes (EC) awareness and use from 2010-2013 in Australia where laws severely restrict EC availability, with awareness and use over the same period in the UK where ECs are readily available.</span></p>
<p><span><span>Among their findings was that "EC awareness and use have risen rapidly between 2010 and 2013 among current and former smokers in both Australia and the UK despite different EC regulatory environments. Substantial numbers in both countries are using ECs that contain nicotine".</span></span></p>
<p><span><span><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;</span></span></span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu231" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu231</a><span style="font-size: 15.5555562973022px; line-height: 1.33;">&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 15.5555562973022px; line-height: 1.33;">or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 15.5555562973022px; line-height: 1.33;">Yong, H-H., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Trends in e-cigarette awareness, trial, and use under the different regulatory environments of Australia and the UK. <em>Nicotine &amp; Tobacco Research, 30 October</em> [Epub before print].</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-11-03 13:47:29.537</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>What would happen to U.S healthcare if it performed at the same level as New Zealand?</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50905/what-would-happen-to-us-healthcare-if-it/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50905/what-would-happen-to-us-healthcare-if-it/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The United States health care system is the most expensive in the world, but the Commonwealth Fund report <em>Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, 2014 Update: How the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally</em> shows the U.S. underperforms relative to 11 other industrialized countries on most dimensions of performance.</p>
<p>The Commonwealth Fund has produced an interactive tool that shows what would happen if the U.S. were to raise its health system performance to the levels achieved elsewhere in the world, including money saved, waiting times reduced, and prevantable deaths.</p>
<p>To view the data for the comparison with New Zealand, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.commonwealthfund.org/interactives-and-data/us-compare-interactive#?ind=2&amp;compare=NZ" target="_blank">http://www.commonwealthfund.org/interactives-and-data/us-compare-interactive#?ind=2&amp;compare=NZ</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-10-24 10:04:58.521</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Global burden of asthma among children</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50597/global-burden-of-asthma-among-children/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50597/global-burden-of-asthma-among-children/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-10-13 14:44:36.04</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Talking about quality: Exploring how &#039;quality&#039; is conceptualized in European hospitals and healthcare systems</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50577/talking-about-quality-exploring-how-quality/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50577/talking-about-quality-exploring-how-quality/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>In this <span>cross-national multi-level case study, the authors&nbsp;</span>explore and compare conceptualization of quality among European national bodies (macro level), senior hospital managers (meso level), and professional groups within clinical micro systems (micro level).</span></p>
<p><span><span>The three quality dimensions clinical effectiveness, patient safety, and patient experience were incorporated in macro level policies in all countries. Senior hospital managers adopted a similar conceptualization, but also included efficiency and costs in their conceptualization of quality. 'Quality' in the forms of measuring indicators and performance management were dominant among senior hospital managers (with clinical and non-clinical background). The differential emphasis on the three quality dimensions was strongly linked to professional roles, personal ideas, and beliefs at the micro level. Clinical effectiveness was dominant among physicians (evidence-based approach), while patient experience was dominant among nurses (patient-centered care, enough time to talk with patients). Conceptualization varied between micro systems depending on the type of services provided.'</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>The authors discuss these findings.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>This is an open access article and is available to read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-478" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1186/1472-6963-14-478</span></a></span></span></p>
<p><span><span><span>Wiig, S., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Talking about quality: exploring how 'quality' is conceptualized in European hospitals and healthcare systems.&nbsp;<em>BMC Health Services Research, 14</em>, 478.</span></span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-10-13 09:25:37.671</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Health Policy and Technology (journal)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50490/health-policy-and-technology-journal/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50490/health-policy-and-technology-journal/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Health Policy and Technology</em> is a cross-disciplinary journal which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical health environments.</p>
<p><span>The journal is owned by the registered charity, the&nbsp;</span>Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine,&nbsp;<span>established in 1918 with the aim of &lsquo;educating medical professionals&rsquo;.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-10-08 11:20:15.103</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Diabetes self-management arrangements in Europe: A realist review to facilitate a project implemented in six countries</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50448/diabetes-self-management-arrangements-in/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50448/diabetes-self-management-arrangements-in/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This review aimed to identify the quantitative literature with regard to diabetes self-management arrangements currently in place within the health care systems of six countries (The United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Bulgaria, and Greece) and explore how these are integrated into the broader health care and welfare systems in each country.</span></p>
<p><span><span>The review is based on results which are derived from a total of at least 5,500 individuals residing in the six participating countries. It indicates a policy shift towards patient-centred self-management of diabetes in a primary care context. The professional role of diabetes specialist nurses, the need for multidisciplinary approaches and a focus on patient education emerge as fundamental principles in the design of relevant programmes. Socio-economic circumstances are relevant to the capacity to self-manage and suggest that any gains and progress will be hard to maintain during economic austerity. The authors note that this realist review should be interpreted within the wider context of a whole systems approach regarding self-care support and chronic illness management.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>This is an open access article and can be downloaded and read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-453" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1186/1472-6963-14-453</span></a></span></span></p>
<p><span><span>Kousoulis, A.A., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Diabetes self-management arrangements in Europe: A realist review to facilitate a project implemented in six countries.&nbsp;<em>BMC Health Services Research, 14</em>:453.</span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-10-06 13:30:55.546</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Lessons from eight countries on diffusing innovation in health care</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49878/lessons-from-eight-countries-on-diffusing/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49878/lessons-from-eight-countries-on-diffusing/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>In this qualitative and quantitative study, the authors investigated the factors and behaviours that foster the adoption of health care innovation in eight countries: Australia, Brazil, England, India, Qatar, South Africa, Spain, and the United States. </span></p>
<p><span>The study "... describes the front-line cultural dynamics that must be fostered to achieve cost-effective and high-impact transformation of health care, and it argues that there is a necessity for greater focus on vital, yet currently underused, organizational action to support the adoption of innovation".</span></p>
<p><span>Available to read in full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/33/9/1516.full" target="_blank">http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/33/9/1516.full</a></span></p>
<p><span>Keown, O.P., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Lessons from eight countries on diffusing innovation in health care. <em>Health Affairs, 33</em>(9), 1516-1522.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-09-11 13:26:55.492</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Integrated care experiences and outcomes in Germany, The Netherlands, and England</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49809/integrated-care-experiences-and-outcomes/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49809/integrated-care-experiences-and-outcomes/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This article describes three recent efforts at care coordination that have been evaluated but not yet included in systematic reviews: Germany&rsquo;s Gesundes Kinzigtal, a population-based approach that organises care across all health service sectors and indications in a targeted region; a programme in the Netherlands that bundles payments for patients with certain chronic conditions; and England&rsquo;s integrated care pilots, which take a variety of approaches to care integration for a range of target populations. </span></p>
<p><span>The authors describe mixed results, and discuss the implications for future projects.</span></p>
<p><span><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0419" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0419</span></a><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></span></p>
<p><span>Busse, R., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Integrated care experiences and outcomes in Germany, The Netherlands, and England. Health Affairs, 33(9), 1549-1558</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-09-10 09:07:12.026</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A comparison of hospital administrative costs in eight nations: US costs exceed all others by far</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49770/a-comparison-of-hospital-administrative-costs/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49770/a-comparison-of-hospital-administrative-costs/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The authors conducted an analysis of hospital administrative costs across eight nations: Canada, England, Scotland, Wales, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>They found that a<span>dministrative costs account for 25 percent of total U.S. hospital spending. These were the highest costs across the nations studied. Scotland and Canada had the lowest administrative costs. </span></p>
<p><span>The authors make recommendations for reducing U.S. per capita spending for hospital administration.</span></p>
<p><span><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1327" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1327</span></a><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>To read more about the study, go to: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/in-the-literature/2014/sep/hospital-administrative-costs" target="_blank">http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/in-the-literature/2014/sep/hospital-administrative-costs</a></span></span></p>
<p><span>Himmelstein, D.U., et al. (2014).&nbsp;A comparison of hospital administrative costs in eight nations: US costs exceed all others by far. <em>Health Affairs, 33</em>(9), 1586-1594.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-09-09 09:41:05.785</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cancer mortality and incidence trends comparing New Zealand and Australia for the period 2000–2007</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49175/cancer-mortality-and-incidence-trends-comparing/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49175/cancer-mortality-and-incidence-trends-comparing/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-08-15 09:59:24.7</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A comparison of cancer statistics in New Zealand and Australia: 1996–2007</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49171/a-comparison-of-cancer-statistics-in-new/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49171/a-comparison-of-cancer-statistics-in-new/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-08-15 09:39:16.242</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>How does hospital quality management drive quality? Results from the Deepening our Understanding of Quality Improvement (DUQuE) project (Europe)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48726/how-does-hospital-quality-management-drive/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48726/how-does-hospital-quality-management-drive/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The project, Deepening our Understanding of Quality Improvement in Europe (DUQuE), was lauched in 2009 and focuses on the effectiveness of quality improvement systems of hospitals in eight European countries.</span></p>
<p><span>In a supplement issue of the <em>International Journal for Quality in Health Care</em> (<span class="toc-citation-volume">volume 26,&nbsp;</span><span class="toc-citation-issue">suppl 1,&nbsp;</span><span class="toc-top-pub-date">April 2014)</span>, a series of papers describe the key findings of the project to date.</span></p>
<p>Most of the papers are open access and can be read in full text. For the full list of papers, go to:&nbsp;<br /><a href="http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/26/suppl_1.toc" target="_blank">http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/26/suppl_1.toc</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-07-25 13:09:10.356</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A comparative review of nurse turnover rates and costs across countries</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48716/a-comparative-review-of-nurse-turnover-rates/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48716/a-comparative-review-of-nurse-turnover-rates/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-07-25 09:30:47.182</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Incidence and mortality of female breast cancer in the Asia-Pacific region</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48515/incidence-and-mortality-of-female-breast/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48515/incidence-and-mortality-of-female-breast/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-07-16 14:28:20.664</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>World Health Statistics 2014</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48500/world-health-statistics-2014/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48500/world-health-statistics-2014/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>World Health Statistics 2014 contains WHO&rsquo;s annual compilation of health-related data for its 194 Member States, and includes a summary of the progress made towards achieving the health-related Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and associated targets.</span></p>
<p><span>This year, it also includes highlight summaries on the ongoing commitment to end preventable maternal deaths; on the need to act now to combat rising levels of childhood obesity; on recent trends in both life expectancy and premature deaths; and on the crucial role of civil registration and vital statistics systems in national and global advancement.</span></p>
<p><span><span>Access to the full text of the report is free online at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2014/en/" target="_blank">http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2014/en/</a></span></span></p>
<p><span><span>To read a media release about the report, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/world-health-statistics-2014/en/" target="_blank">http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/world-health-statistics-2014/en/</a></span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-07-16 10:58:51.769</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2013: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank and the United Nations Population Division</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48497/trends-in-maternal-mortality-1990-to-2013/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48497/trends-in-maternal-mortality-1990-to-2013/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank and the United Nations Population Division provide updated estimates of maternal mortality for the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005 and 2013 (including for New Zealand).</span></p>
<p><span>This document was published in May 2014.</span></p>
<p><span>The document is available to download in full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/monitoring/maternal-mortality-2013/en/" target="_blank">http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/monitoring/maternal-mortality-2013/en/</a></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-07-16 10:47:15.233</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The state of healthcare disaster plans in New Zealand and the Sultanate of Oman: An international comparative analysis</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48407/the-state-of-healthcare-disaster-plans-in/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48407/the-state-of-healthcare-disaster-plans-in/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-07-11 09:21:16.106</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Noncommunicable diseases country profiles 2014</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48406/noncommunicable-diseases-country-profiles/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48406/noncommunicable-diseases-country-profiles/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>In September 2011, WHO released the first set of noncommunicable diseases (NCD) country profiles, highlighting the status of NCDs in each WHO member state. This second set of profiles provides an updated overview of the NCD situation for each country. </span></p>
<p><span>The report presents information for each country related to their NCD mortality, risk factors and national systems capacity to prevent and control NCDs. The profiles include the number, rates and causes of deaths from NCDs and trends in NCD mortality since 2000; the prevalence of selected risk factors; and information describing current national responses to prevention and control of NCDs.</span></p>
<p><span>The full report as well as NCD profiles by country are available to download and read in full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-profiles-2014/en/" target="_blank">http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-profiles-2014/en/</a></span></p>
<p><span>World Health Organization (2014).&nbsp;<em>Noncommunicable Diseases:&nbsp;Country Proﬁles 2014.</em> Geneva: World Health Organization.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-07-11 09:05:27.234</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>OECD Health Statistics 2014</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48174/oecd-health-statistics-2014/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48174/oecd-health-statistics-2014/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>OECD Health Statistics 2014 was released on 30 June 2014. The&nbsp;OECD Health Database offers the most comprehensive source of comparable statistics on health and health systems across OECD countries.&nbsp;It allows for comparative analyses of diverse health systems.</p>
<p>To access the database, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.oecd.org/health/health-data.htm" target="_blank">http://www.oecd.org/health/health-data.htm</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-07-01 09:03:45.16</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Mirror, mirror on the wall, 2014 update: How the U.S. health care system compares internationally</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47905/mirror-mirror-on-the-wall-2014-update-how/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47905/mirror-mirror-on-the-wall-2014-update-how/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-06-17 09:19:47.775</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation: Annual report 2012–13</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47903/centre-for-outcome-and-resource-evaluation/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47903/centre-for-outcome-and-resource-evaluation/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-06-17 08:41:20.925</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Asia Pacific Observatory on Health Systems and Policies</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47867/asia-pacific-observatory-on-health-systems/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47867/asia-pacific-observatory-on-health-systems/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The Asia Pacific Observatory (APO)&nbsp;is a partnership of governments, development agencies and the research community. Its mission is to act as a knowledge broker between researchers and policy makers and to promote evidence-based health policy-making in the region.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-06-16 09:17:29.154</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Tobacco price and taxation: ITC cross-country comparison report</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47759/tobacco-price-and-taxation-itc-cross-country/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47759/tobacco-price-and-taxation-itc-cross-country/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-06-10 13:35:50.997</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Quality, cost, and their trade-off in treating AMI and stroke patients in European hospitals</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47350/quality-cost-and-their-trade-off-in-treating/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47350/quality-cost-and-their-trade-off-in-treating/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Describes the quality of hospital care by pooling patient-level data from five European countries (Finland, France, Germany, Spain, and Sweden) in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke. Large differences between hospitals and countries in rates of patients discharged alive were found for both AMI and stroke but a clear cost-quality trade-off was not found.</p>
<p><span><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.healthpolicyjrnl.com/article/S0168-8510%2814%2900130-4/abstract" target="_blank">http://www.healthpolicyjrnl.com/article/S0168-8510%2814%2900130-4/abstract</a></span><span> or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></span></p>
<p>Hakkinen, U., et al. (2014). Quality, cost, and their trade-off in treating AMI and stroke patients in European hospitals. <em>Health Policy,&nbsp;117</em>(1), 15&ndash;27.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-05-21 12:23:04.982</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Diabetes in the Western Pacific Region - Past, present and future</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44602/diabetes-in-the-western-pacific-region-past/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44602/diabetes-in-the-western-pacific-region-past/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The authors describe the prevalence of diabetes in the Western Pacific Area based on the 2013 issue of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) Diabetes Atlas.</span></p>
<p><span>They also discuss examples from the Western Pacific Area to prevent and control diabetes.</span></p>
<p><span><span>Now available to read in free full text at: &nbsp;</span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.012" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.012</span></a><span>&nbsp;</span></span></p>
<p><span>Chan, J.C.N., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Diabetes in the Western Pacific Region - Past, present and future.&nbsp;<em>Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice,&nbsp;103</em>(2), 244-255</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-05-16 11:58:47.96</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Principles and considerations for adding a vaccine to a national immunization programme: From decision to implementation and monitoring</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47164/principles-and-considerations-for-adding/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47164/principles-and-considerations-for-adding/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This document from the World Health Organization is an update of the 2005 WHO<em> Vaccine Introduction Guidelines</em>. It brings together the recommendations and guidance from many recent guidelines, tools and other documents on specific aspects of immunisation and on specific vaccines. It is intended as a general guidance document that can be used as a reference for making decisions about, and planning the introduction of, a vaccine into a national immunisation programme. It draws from the experiences of many countries that have introduced new vaccines.</p>
<p>To download a full text copy of the report, go to: <a href="http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/111548/1/9789241506892_eng.pdf?ua=1" target="_blank">http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/111548/1/9789241506892_eng.pdf?ua=1</a></p>
<p>World Health Organization. (2014). <em>Principles and considerations for adding a vaccine to a national immunization programme: From decision to implementation and monitoring</em>. Geneva: World Health Organization.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-05-09 13:56:33.536</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990—2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47039/global-regional-and-national-levels-and-causes/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47039/global-regional-and-national-levels-and-causes/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Systematic review which measures progress towards the Millennium Development Goal 5 (MDG 5) target of a 75% reduction in the maternal mortality ratio between 1990 and 2015. The review measured levels and tracked trends in maternal mortality, examined the key causes contributing to maternal death, and looked at the timing of maternal death with respect to delivery. Analysis showed that only 16 countries will achieve the MDG 5 target by 2015. Regions such as west and central Africa are making particularly slow progress.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract and a free full text version of the article, go to: <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2814%2960696-6/fulltext" target="_blank">http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2814%2960696-6/fulltext</a></p>
<p>Kassebaum, N. J., et al. (2014). Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990&mdash;2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. <em>The Lancet,&nbsp;384</em>(9947), 980 - 1004.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-05-06 10:36:28.541</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Global, regional, and national levels of neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality during 1990—2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47037/global-regional-and-national-levels-of-neonatal/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47037/global-regional-and-national-levels-of-neonatal/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Systematic review which measures progress towards the Millennium Development Goal 4 (MDG 4) target of reduction of child mortality by two thirds from 1990 to 2015, and identifies models of success. Analysis showed that only 27 developing countries are expected to achieve MDG 4. Decreases since 2000 in under-5 mortality rates are accelerating in many developing countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. However, without further accelerated progress, many countries in west and central Africa will still have high levels of under-5 mortality in 2030.</p>
<p>Access to the full text of the article is free but registration is required on The Lancet site. To read the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2814%2960497-9/fulltext" target="_blank">http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2814%2960497-9/fulltext</a> or contact your DHB library, local or organisational library for assistance.</p>
<p>Wang, H., et al. (2014). Global, regional, and national levels of neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality during 1990&mdash;2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. <em>The Lancet,&nbsp;384</em>(9947), 957 - 979.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-05-06 10:27:12.656</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Control of six risk factors would reduce CVD mortality by one third: 25x25 Global Roadmap</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47010/control-of-six-risk-factors-would-reduce/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47010/control-of-six-risk-factors-would-reduce/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>By adopting a comprehensive plan to reduce tobacco use, harmful alcohol use, salt intake, limit physical inactivity, and reduce elevated blood pressure and glucose levels, countries can a go a long way toward reducing the risk of premature mortality from noncommunicable diseases, including CVD, according to a new report published in <em>The Lancet</em>.</p>
<p>In fact, if countries achieved the goals set out by the 25x25 World Health Assembly (WHA) roadmap, there would be a 22% reduction in premature deaths from CVD, cancer, diabetes, and chronic respiratory disease in men and a 19% reduction in women.</p>
<p>To read the full news story on Medscape, go to: <a href="http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/824592" target="_blank">http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/824592</a></p>
<p>To access the HIIRC record for <em>The Lancet</em> report, go to: <a href="http://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47009/" target="_blank">http://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47009/</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-05-05 10:02:17.959</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Contribution of six risk factors to achieving the 25×25 non-communicable disease mortality reduction target: A modelling study</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47009/contribution-of-six-risk-factors-to-achieving/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47009/contribution-of-six-risk-factors-to-achieving/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The 25x25 target has seen countries agreeing to reduce premature mortality from cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, cancers, and diabetes by 25% from 2010 levels by 2025. This paper estimated the contribution of achieving six risk factor targets (tobacco and alcohol use, salt intake, obesity, and raised blood pressure and glucose) towards meeting the 25&times;25 mortality target.</p>
<p>It was found that, if risk factor targets are achieved, the probability of dying from the four main non-communicable diseases between the ages of 30 years and 70 years will decrease by 22% in men and by 19% in women between 2010 and 2025, compared with a decrease of 11% in men and 10% in women under 'business-as-usual' trends. Achieving the risk factor targets will delay or prevent more than 37 million deaths with most of the benefits of achieving the risk factor targets being in low- and middle-income countries.</p>
<p>Access to the full text of the article is free but registration is required on the Lancet site. To read the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2814%2960616-4/fulltext" target="_blank">http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2814%2960616-4/fulltext</a>&nbsp;or contact your local, DHB or organisational library for assistance.</p>
<p>Kontis, V., et al. (2014). Contribution of six risk factors to achieving the 25&times;25 non-communicable disease mortality reduction target: A modelling study. <em>The Lancet,&nbsp;384</em>(9941), 427 - 437.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-05-05 09:55:17.68</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Global estimates of the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy for 2013 for the IDF Diabetes Atlas</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43988/global-estimates-of-the-prevalence-of-hyperglycaemia/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43988/global-estimates-of-the-prevalence-of-hyperglycaemia/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>In this study, the authors estimated the number of live births worldwide and by International Diabetes Federation Region who developed hyperglycaemia in pregnancy in 2013.</p>
<p>They found that the "... global prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy in women (20&ndash;49 years) is 16.9%, or 21.4 million live births in 2013. An estimated 16.0% of those cases may be due to total diabetes in pregnancy. The highest prevalence was found in the South-East Asia Region at 25.0% ... More than 90% of cases of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy are estimated to occur in low- and middle-income countries".</p>
<p><span>Now available to read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.diabetesresearchclinicalpractice.com/article/S0168-8227(13)00386-0/fulltext%20" target="_blank">http://www.diabetesresearchclinicalpractice.com/article/S0168-8227(13)00386-0/fulltext</a></span><a href="http://www.diabetesresearchclinicalpractice.com/article/S0168-8227(13)00386-0/fulltext%20" target="_blank"><span>&nbsp;</span></a></p>
<p>Guariguata, L., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Global estimates of the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy for 2013 for the IDF Diabetes Atlas.&nbsp;<em>Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice,&nbsp;103</em>(2), 176-185.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-05-02 14:02:43.904</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Global estimates of undiagnosed diabetes in adults for 2013 for the IDF Diabetes Atlas</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43989/global-estimates-of-undiagnosed-diabetes/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43989/global-estimates-of-undiagnosed-diabetes/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper provides global estimates of the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus (UDM).&nbsp;</p>
<p>Based on&nbsp;88 sources representing 74 countries, the authors found that "[g]lobally, 45.8%, or 174.8 million of all diabetes cases in adults are estimated to be undiagnosed, ranging from 24.1% to 75.1% across data regions. An estimated 83.8% of all cases of UDM are in low- and middle-income countries. At a country level, Pacific Island nations have the highest prevalence of UDM".</p>
<p><span>Now available to read in free full text at: &nbsp;</span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.001" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.001</span></a><span>&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>Beagley, J., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Global estimates of undiagnosed diabetes in adults for 2013 for the IDF Diabetes Atlas. <em>Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice,&nbsp;103</em>(2), 150-160.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-05-02 14:00:58.225</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>&quot;I don&#039;t see an added value for myself&quot;: A qualitative study exploring the social cognitive variables associated with influenza vaccination of Belgian, Dutch and German healthcare personnel</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46915/i-dont-see-an-added-value-for-myself-a-qualitative/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46915/i-dont-see-an-added-value-for-myself-a-qualitative/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This qualitative study of health professionals in Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany examined why these health professionals did (or did not) get vaccinated against influenza. Across countries, self-protection, patient protection, and protection of family members were reported as the most important reasons to get vaccinated against influenza. Reasons to not get vaccinated were fear of side effects caused by the vaccine, a low risk-perception, the disbelief in the effectiveness of influenza vaccination, organisational barriers, misconceptions, and undefined negative emotions.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for access to a free full text version of the article, go to: <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/407/abstract" target="_blank">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/407/abstract</a></p>
<p>Lehmann, B. A., et al. (2014).&nbsp;"I don't see an added value for myself": A qualitative study exploring the social cognitive variables associated with influenza vaccination of Belgian, Dutch and German healthcare personnel. <em>BMC Public Health</em>, <em>14, </em>407, <span class="pseudotab">doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-407.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-04-29 09:13:36.322</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Seasonal influenza immunisation in Europe. Overview of recommendations and vaccination coverage for three seasons: Pre-pandemic (2008/09), pandemic (2009/10) and post-pandemic (2010/11)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46869/seasonal-influenza-immunisation-in-europe/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46869/seasonal-influenza-immunisation-in-europe/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Since 2008, annual surveys of influenza vaccination policies, practices and coverage have been undertaken in 29 European Union/European Economic Area countries. This paper summarises the results of three seasonal influenza seasons: 2008/09, 2009/10 and 2010/11. The results of the surveys indicate that most countries recommend influenza vaccination for the main target groups (older people, infants, pregnant women, healthcare workers); however, only a few countries have achieved the target of 75% coverage among risk groups. Coverage among healthcare workers remained low.</p>
<p>To access a free full text version of the article, go to: <a href="http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20780" target="_blank">http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20780</a><br /></p>
<p>Mereckiene, J., et al. (2014). Seasonal influenza immunisation in Europe. Overview of recommendations and vaccination coverage for three seasons: Pre-pandemic (2008/09), pandemic (2009/10) and post-pandemic (2010/11). <em>Eurosurveillance</em>, <em>19</em> (16), Article 6.<br /></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-04-25 11:07:17.054</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/42343/a-systematic-review-of-medical-practice-variation/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/42343/a-systematic-review-of-medical-practice-variation/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This systematic review investigated&nbsp;medical practice variations in OECD countries.</p>
<p>A large number of studies were identified. The authors found "... large variations across regions, hospitals and physician practices for almost every condition and procedure studied. Many studies focused on high-impact conditions, but very few looked at the causes or outcomes of medical practice variations".&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>Now available to read in full text at: &nbsp;</span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.08.002" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.08.002</span></a><span>&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>Corallo, A.N., et al. (2014).&nbsp;A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries. <em>Health Policy, 114</em>(1), 5-14.&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-03-17 10:09:14.095</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Global practices of meningococcal vaccine use and impact on invasive disease</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/45528/global-practices-of-meningococcal-vaccine/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/45528/global-practices-of-meningococcal-vaccine/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This review focuses on different approaches to including meningococcal vaccines in country programmes across the world (including New Zealand) and their effect on the burden of invasive meningococcal disease as reflected by pre and post-vaccine incidence rates in the last 20 years.</span></p>
<p><span><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1179%2F2047773214Y.0000000126" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1179%2F2047773214Y.0000000126</a></span><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></span></p>
<p><span>Ali, A., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Global practices of meningococcal vaccine use and impact on invasive disease.&nbsp;<em>Pathogens and Global Health, 108</em>(1), 11-20.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-02-27 12:23:25.465</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Global rural diabetes prevalence: A systematic review and meta-analysis covering 1990–2012</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/45162/global-rural-diabetes-prevalence-a-systematic/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/45162/global-rural-diabetes-prevalence-a-systematic/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors investigate diabetes prevalence in rural areas globally and how it has changed over time in high-income countries and low-middle income countries.</span></p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2014.01.005" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1016/j.diabres.2014.01.005</span></a></span><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>
<p><span>Zabetian, A., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Global rural diabetes prevalence: A systematic review and meta-analysis covering 1990&ndash;2012.&nbsp;<em>Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice,&nbsp;104</em>(2), 206-213.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-02-12 09:56:31.655</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Postoperative complications in Australia and New Zealand (the REASON study)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44934/postoperative-complications-in-australia/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44934/postoperative-complications-in-australia/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-01-31 11:41:14.235</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A survey of tobacco dependence treatment guidelines in 121 countries</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39105/a-survey-of-tobacco-dependence-treatment/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39105/a-survey-of-tobacco-dependence-treatment/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<div id="add12172-sec-0001" class="section">
<div class="para">
<p>This survey investigated progress among Parties to the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in developing <span>national tobacco treatment guidelines</span>.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="add12172-sec-0002">
<p>Responses were received from 121 (73%) of the 166 countries surveyed. and the authors conclude from the results that "fewer than half of the Parties to the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) have developed national tobacco treatment guidelines, but where guidelines exist they broadly follow FCTC Article 14 guideline".</p>
<p>Now available to read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.12172/full" target="_blank">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.12172/full</a></p>
<p>Pin&eacute;-Abata, H., McNeill, A., Murray, R., Bitton, A., Rigotti, N. &amp; Raw, M. (2013), A survey of tobacco dependence treatment services in 121 countries.&nbsp;<em>Addiction, 108</em>(8), 1476-1484.</p>
</div>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-01-22 12:13:58.066</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Comparison of oropharyngeal and oral cavity squamous cell cancer incidence and trends in New Zealand and Queensland, Australia</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44726/comparison-of-oropharyngeal-and-oral-cavity/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44726/comparison-of-oropharyngeal-and-oral-cavity/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-01-22 08:53:14.82</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Multinational comparisons of health systems data, 2013</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44678/multinational-comparisons-of-health-systems/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44678/multinational-comparisons-of-health-systems/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<div class="body">
<p class="first">In this chartbook, the authors use data collected by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and other agencies to compare health care systems and performance on a range of topics, including spending, hospitals, physicians, pharmaceuticals, prevention, mortality, quality and safety, and prices.</p>
</div>
<div id="body" class="body">
<p>They present data across several industrialised countries: Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Japan, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States.</p>
<p>Available to read at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Publications/Chartbooks/2014/Multinational-Comparisons.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Publications/Chartbooks/2014/Multinational-Comparisons.aspx</a></p>
<p>Squires, D. (2014).&nbsp;<em>Multinational Comparisons of Health Systems Data, 2013</em>. The Commonwealth Fund.</p>
</div>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-01-19 10:51:40.485</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Comparison of melanoma guidelines in the U.S.A., Canada, Europe, Australia and New Zealand: A critical appraisal and comprehensive review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44600/comparison-of-melanoma-guidelines-in-the/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44600/comparison-of-melanoma-guidelines-in-the/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-01-14 08:57:22.5</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980-2012</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44586/smoking-prevalence-and-cigarette-consumption/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44586/smoking-prevalence-and-cigarette-consumption/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span><span>The authors used nationally representative sources t</span>o estimate the prevalence of daily smoking by age and sex, and the number of cigarettes per smoker per day, for 187 countries from 1980 to 2012.</span></p>
<p><span><span>They found that that large reductions in the estimated prevalence of daily smoking at the global level over this time, but because of population growth, the number of smokers increased significantly.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.284692" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1001/jama.2013.284692</span></a><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span><span><span>Ng, M., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980-2012. <em>JAMA,&nbsp;</em><span><em>311</em>(2), 183-192.</span></span></span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-01-13 11:17:08.885</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>End-stage kidney disease among indigenous peoples of Australia and New Zealand</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44335/end-stage-kidney-disease-among-indigenous/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44335/end-stage-kidney-disease-among-indigenous/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-12-19 09:06:29.097</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A cross-country study of cigarette prices and affordability: Evidence from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44322/a-cross-country-study-of-cigarette-prices/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44322/a-cross-country-study-of-cigarette-prices/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The authors "... describe the characteristics of two primary determinants of cigarette consumption: cigarette affordability and the range of prices paid for cigarettes (and bidis, where applicable) in a set of 15 countries". </span></p>
<p><span>They also identify opportunities for reducing consumption through tax adjustments.</span></p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050413%20" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050413&nbsp;</a>or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</p>
<p>Kostova, D., et al. (2014).&nbsp;A cross-country study of cigarette prices and affordability: Evidence from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey. <em>Tobacco Control, 23</em>, e3.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-12-18 10:32:29.163</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Rubella and Congenital Rubella Syndrome control and elimination — Global progress, 2000–2012</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44202/rubella-and-congenital-rubella-syndrome-control/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44202/rubella-and-congenital-rubella-syndrome-control/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Data were obtained from the WHO and United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) Joint Reporting Form (JRF), which is used to collect information from United Nations member states on vaccination campaigns, vaccination schedules, and number of doses of RCV administered by routine immunization services</span><span>. </span></p>
<p><span>Data from 2000&ndash;2012 were analysed to assess the changes in rubella and CRS control activities.</span></p>
<p><span>The report is available to read in full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6248a3.htm?s_cid=mm6248a3_x" target="_blank">http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6248a3.htm?s_cid=mm6248a3_x</a></span></p>
<p>Rubella and Congenital Rubella Syndrome control and elimination &mdash; Global progress, 2000&ndash;2012.&nbsp;<em>Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,&nbsp;62</em>(48);983-986.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-12-12 11:03:39.705</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Comparative study of maternity systems</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44160/comparative-study-of-maternity-systems/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44160/comparative-study-of-maternity-systems/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-12-11 08:38:21.183</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Adult immunization policies in advanced economies: Vaccination recommendations, financing, and vaccination coverage</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43957/adult-immunization-policies-in-advanced-economies/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43957/adult-immunization-policies-in-advanced-economies/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This study describes the results of a survey that investigated the adult vaccination policies in developed countries (including New Zealand).</p>
<p>The survey asked about national recommendations for adults for 16 vaccines or vaccine components, funding mechanisms for recommended adult vaccines, and the availability of adult vaccination coverage estimates.</p>
<p>Thirty-one of 33 (93.9&nbsp;%) advanced economies responded to the survey. Twelve of 31 (38.7&nbsp;%) reported having a comprehensive adult immunization schedule. The total number of vaccines or vaccine components recommended for adults ranged from one to 15 with a median of 10. Seasonal influenza (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;30), tetanus (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;28), pneumococcal polysaccharide (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;27), and hepatitis B (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;27) were the most frequently recommended vaccines or components.</p>
<p>The authors conclude that approximately two-thirds of survey respondents do not have a comprehensive adult vaccine schedule, and most do not measure vaccination coverage. They found that a funding mechanism is available for most recommended adult vaccines.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and is available to read in free full text online at: &nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0438-x" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1007/s00038-012-0438-x</span></a></p>
<p><span>Wu, L.A., et al. (2013).&nbsp;Adult immunization policies in advanced economies: Vaccination recommendations, financing, and vaccination coverage. <em>International Journal of Public Health,&nbsp;58</em>(6), 865-874.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-12-02 16:27:16.879</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Integrated care: What policies support and influence integration in health care across New Zealand, England, Canada and the United States? Report 2</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43956/integrated-care-what-policies-support-and/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43956/integrated-care-what-policies-support-and/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-12-02 16:15:57.319</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cancer care: Assuring quality to improve survival (OECD)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43153/cancer-care-assuring-quality-to-improve-survival/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43153/cancer-care-assuring-quality-to-improve-survival/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Cancer Care: Assuring Quality to Improve Survival</em> surveys the policy trends in cancer care over recent years and looks at survival rates to identify why some countries are doing better than others. It sets out what governments should do to reduce the burden of cancer in their countries.</p>
<p>As well as an adequate level of resourcing, a comprehensive national cancer control plan appears critical, emphasising initiatives such as early detection and fast-track treatment pathways. Countries also need better data, particularly for patients&rsquo; experiences of care, in order to provide high quality, continuously improving cancer care.</p>
<p>There is a preview of this report available on the OECD website at: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.oecd.org/health/cancer-care.htm#Publication">http://www.oecd.org/health/cancer-care.htm#Publication</a></p>
<p><span>To read an overview of the report, go to:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Focus-on-Health_Cancer-Care-2013.pdf">http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Focus-on-Health_Cancer-Care-2013.pdf</a></p>
<p>To accessess the full version, there are a number of options:</p>
<ul>
<li>Subscribers and readers at subscribing institutions can access the online edition via&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264181052-en">OECD iLibrary</a>, the OECD online library.</li>
<li>Non-subscribers can purchase the PDF e-book and/or paper copy via the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.oecd.org/bookshop?9789264180963">Online Bookshop</a>.</li>
<li>Government officials with accounts (<a href="http://www.oecd.org/general/olis.htm">subscribe</a>) can go to the "Books" tab on OLIS.&nbsp;</li>
<li><span>Or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></li>
</ul>
<p>OECD (2013).&nbsp;<em>Cancer care: Assuring quality to improve survival.</em> OECD Health Policy Studies, OECD Publishing.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-10-31 08:52:38.599</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A comparative analysis of risk factors and stroke risk for Asian and non-Asian men: The Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43130/a-comparative-analysis-of-risk-factors-and/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43130/a-comparative-analysis-of-risk-factors-and/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-10-30 13:22:45.114</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990—2010: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43026/global-and-regional-burden-of-stroke-during/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43026/global-and-regional-burden-of-stroke-during/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The authors used data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2010 (GBD 2010) to estimate the global and regional burden of stroke during 1990&mdash;2010.</p>
<p>Over the period studied (1990 to 2010), the age-standardised incidence of stroke significantly decreased by 12% in high-income countries, and increased by 12% in low-income and middle-income countries (non-significantly).</p>
<p>Mortality rates decreased significantly in both high and low-income and middle-income countries. In 2010, the absolute numbers of people with first stroke, stroke survivors, stroke-related deaths,and DALYs lost were high and had significantly increased since 1990, with most of the burden in low-income and middle-income countries.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The authors discuss the implications of these findings and the other findings identified in the study.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>Access to the full text of the article is free but registration is required on The Lancet site.</em></p>
<p>To read the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to: <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(13)61953-4/fulltext" target="_blank">http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(13)61953-4/fulltext</a>&nbsp;or contact your local or organisational library for assistance.</p>
<p>Feigin, V.L., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990&mdash;2010: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. <em>The Lancet,&nbsp;383</em>(9913), 245-255.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-10-24 13:07:33.512</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Assessing quality in cross-country comparisons of health systems and policies: Towards a set of generic quality criteria (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/42990/assessing-quality-in-cross-country-comparisons/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/42990/assessing-quality-in-cross-country-comparisons/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a growing body of cross-country comparisons in health systems and policy research. However, there is little consensus as to how to assess its quality. This is partly due to the fact that cross-country comparison constitutes a diverse inter-disciplinary field of study, with much variation in the motives for research, foci and levels of analyses, and methodological approaches.</p>
<p>Inspired by the views of subject area experts and using the distinction between variable-based and case-based research, the authors briefly review the main different types of cross-country comparisons in health systems and policy research to identify pertinent quality issues.</p>
<p>From this, they identify the following generic quality criteria for cross-country comparisons: (1) appropriate use of theory, (2) explicit selection of comparator countries, (3) rigour of the comparative design, (4) attention to the complexity of cross-national comparison, (5) rigour of the research methods, and (6) contribution to knowledge. This list may not be exclusive though publication and discussion of the list of criteria should help raise awareness in this field of what constitutes high quality research. In turn, this should be helpful for those planning, undertaking, or commissioning cross-country comparative research.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and is available to read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.healthpolicyjrnl.com/article/S0168-8510(13)00096-1/fulltext" target="_blank">http://www.healthpolicyjrnl.com/article/S0168-8510(13)00096-1/fulltext</a></p>
<p>Carace, M., et al. (2013).&nbsp;Assessing quality in cross-country comparisons of health systems and policies: Towards a set of generic quality criteria.&nbsp;<em>Health Policy,&nbsp;112</em>(1), 156-162.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-10-23 11:42:39.802</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Methods to stimulate national and sub-national benchmarking through international health system performance comparisons: A Canadian approach</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/42809/methods-to-stimulate-national-and-sub-national/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/42809/methods-to-stimulate-national-and-sub-national/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper presents, discusses and evaluates methods used by the Canadian Institute for Health Information to present health system performance international comparisons in ways that facilitate their understanding by the public and health system policy-makers and can stimulate performance benchmarking.</p>
<p>The authors used statistical techniques to normalise the results and present them on a standardised scale facilitating understanding of results. They compared results to the OECD average, and to benchmarks. They also applied various data quality rules to ensure the validity of results. In order to evaluate the impact of the public release of these results, they used quantitative and qualitative methods and documented other types of impact.</p>
<p>The authors conclude that the&nbsp;methods used seemed attractive to various audiences in the Canadian context and achieved the objectives originally defined. These methods could be refined and applied in different contexts.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and can be read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.healthpolicyjrnl.com/article/S0168-8510(13)00080-8/fulltext" target="_blank">http://www.healthpolicyjrnl.com/article/S0168-8510(13)00080-8/fulltext</a></p>
<p>Veillard, J., et al. (2013).&nbsp;Methods to stimulate national and sub-national benchmarking through international health system performance comparisons: A Canadian approach.&nbsp;<span><em>Health Policy, 112</em>(1), 141-147.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-10-16 09:51:02.201</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>International comparisons of the technical efficiency of the hospital sector: Panel data analysis of OECD countries using parametric and non-parametric approaches</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38872/international-comparisons-of-the-technical/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38872/international-comparisons-of-the-technical/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This study compared the technical efficiency of the hospital sector from OECD countries over the period 2000&ndash;2009. </span></p>
<p><span>The analysis shows that countries with higher health care expenditure per capita, tend to have a more technically efficient hospital sector. The authors note that the hospital sector in countries with higher income inequality and longer average hospital length of stay is less technically efficient.</span></p>
<p><span>Now available to read in free full text at: <a href="http://www.healthpolicyjrnl.com/article/S0168-8510(13)00067-5/fulltext" target="_blank">&nbsp;http://www.healthpolicyjrnl.com/article/S0168-8510(13)00067-5/fulltext</a>&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span>Varabyova, Y. &amp;&nbsp;Schrey&ouml;gg, J. (2013).&nbsp;International comparisons of the technical efficiency of the hospital sector: Panel data analysis of OECD countries using parametric and non-parametric approaches. <em>Health Policy,&nbsp;112</em>(1), 70-79</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-10-10 12:41:28.282</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: An international collaboration to inform cancer policy in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39739/the-international-cancer-benchmarking-partnership/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39739/the-international-cancer-benchmarking-partnership/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership was initiated by the Department of Health in England to study international variation in cancer survival, and to inform policy to improve cancer survival. It is a research collaboration between twelve jurisdictions in six countries: Australia (New South Wales, Victoria), Canada (Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario), Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom (England, Northern Ireland, Wales).</p>
<p>The project currently has five modules examining: (1) cancer survival, (2) population awareness and beliefs about cancer, (3) attitudes, behaviours and systems in primary care, (4) delays in diagnosis and treatment, and their causes, and (5) treatment, co-morbidities and other factors. The module design, governance structure, funding arrangements and management approach to the partnership provide a case study in conducting international comparisons of health systems that are both academically and clinically robust and of immediate relevance to policymakers.</p>
<p>Now available to read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.healthpolicyjrnl.com/article/S0168-8510(13)00097-3/fulltext" target="_blank">http://www.healthpolicyjrnl.com/article/S0168-8510(13)00097-3/fulltext</a></p>
<p>Butler, J., et al. (2013). The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: An international collaboration to inform cancer policy in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom. <em>Health Policy,&nbsp;112</em>(1), 148-155.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-10-10 12:10:50.816</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Patterns of colorectal cancer care in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/41742/patterns-of-colorectal-cancer-care-in-europe/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/41742/patterns-of-colorectal-cancer-care-in-europe/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-08-27 15:05:29.932</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A comparison of trends in melanoma mortality in New Zealand and Australia: The two countries with the highest melanoma incidence and mortality in the world</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/41202/a-comparison-of-trends-in-melanoma-mortality/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/41202/a-comparison-of-trends-in-melanoma-mortality/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-08-07 10:20:53.991</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Public spending on health and long-term care: A new set of projections (OECD)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/41083/public-spending-on-health-and-long-term-care/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/41083/public-spending-on-health-and-long-term-care/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This paper provides new projections of public spending on health and long-term care for OECD countries (including New Zealand) and the BRIICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, Indonesia, China and South Africa). </span></p>
<p><span>Despite the inevitable uncertainty surrounding projections, they suggest a rapidly rising trend over the next 50 years.</span></p>
<p><span>To access the paper, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.oecd.org/health/public-spending-on-health-and-long-term-care.htm">http://www.oecd.org/health/public-spending-on-health-and-long-term-care.htm</a></span></p>
<p>De La Maisonneuve, C. &amp; Oliveira&nbsp;Martins, J.&nbsp;(2013).&nbsp;<em>Public spending on health&nbsp;and long-term care: a new set&nbsp;of projections.</em> OECD&nbsp;Economic Policy Papers No. 06. Paris: OECD.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-08-02 10:39:50.41</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Epidemiology of prostate cancer in the Asia-Pacific region</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40786/epidemiology-of-prostate-cancer-in-the-asia/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40786/epidemiology-of-prostate-cancer-in-the-asia/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-07-22 10:47:37.081</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The impact of a two- versus three-yearly cervical screening interval recommendation on cervical cancer incidence and mortality: An analysis of trends in Australia, New Zealand, and England</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40767/the-impact-of-a-two-versus-three-yearly-cervical/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40767/the-impact-of-a-two-versus-three-yearly-cervical/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-07-19 20:27:59.016</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2013:  Enforcing bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40645/who-report-on-the-global-tobacco-epidemic/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40645/who-report-on-the-global-tobacco-epidemic/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Continued success in global tobacco control is detailed in this year&rsquo;s <em>WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2013</em>. The fourth in the series, the report presents the status of the MPOWER measures, with country-specific data updated and aggregated through 2012.</p>
<p>The report has a special focus on legislation to ban tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS) in WHO Member States and an in-depth analyses of TAPS bans were performed, allowing for a more detailed understanding of progress and future challenges in this area.</p>
<p>To read or download the report in full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.who.int/tobacco/global_report/2013/en/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.who.int/tobacco/global_report/2013/en/index.html</a></p>
<p>To read a WHO media release about the report, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2013/ban_tobacco_20130710/en/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2013/ban_tobacco_20130710/en/index.html</a></p>
<p>World Health Organization (2013).&nbsp;<em>WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2013: &nbsp;Enforcing bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship</em>. Geneva: World Health Organization.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-07-11 11:35:33.536</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Worldwide socioeconomic status and stroke mortality: An ecological study</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40150/worldwide-socioeconomic-status-and-stroke/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40150/worldwide-socioeconomic-status-and-stroke/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The effect of socioeconomic status on stroke mortality at population level has been controversial. This study explored the association of&nbsp;socioeconomic status in childhood and adulthood with stroke mortality, as well as variations in this association among countries/regions.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for access to a free full text version of the article, go to: <a href="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/12/1/42/abstract" target="_blank">http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/12/1/42/abstract</a></p>
<p>Hui Wu, S., et al. (2013). Worldwide socioeconomic status and stroke mortality: an ecological study. <em>International Journal for Equity in Health</em>, 12:42.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-06-17 16:46:08.017</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The contributions of risk factor trends to cardiometabolic mortality decline in 26 industrialized countries</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40038/the-contributions-of-risk-factor-trends-to/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40038/the-contributions-of-risk-factor-trends-to/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-06-11 10:22:36.475</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Global Tobacco Surveillance System Data (GTSSData)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39789/global-tobacco-surveillance-system-data-gtssdata/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39789/global-tobacco-surveillance-system-data-gtssdata/
?tag=crossculturalcomparison&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>GTSSData houses and displays data from four tobacco-related surveys conducted around the world.</p>
<p>The purpose of GTSSData is to enhance countries' capacity to monitor tobacco use, guide national tobacco prevention, and control programs, and facilitate comparison of tobacco-related data at the national, regional, and global levels.</p>
<p>Access to this Data is available at: <a href="http://nccd.cdc.gov/GTSSData/default/default.aspx" target="_blank">http://nccd.cdc.gov/GTSSData/default/default.aspx</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-05-27 16:24:02.546</pubDate>
					</item>
				
			
	</channel>
</rss>
