<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>
			
			
				
			
			Health Improvement and Innovation Resource Centre
		</title>
		<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="https://www.hiirc.org.nz/site.rss
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<language>en</language>
		<copyright>2009-2018 hiirc.org.nz</copyright>
		
		
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Simplification of a scoring system maintained overall accuracy but decreased the proportion classified as low risk</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/56599/simplification-of-a-scoring-system-maintained/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/56599/simplification-of-a-scoring-system-maintained/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-06-15 11:11:03.463</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Development and piloting of a decision aid for women considering participation in the Sentinel Node Biopsy versus Axillary Clearance 2 breast cancer trial</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/56384/development-and-piloting-of-a-decision-aid/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/56384/development-and-piloting-of-a-decision-aid/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-06-04 10:47:33.921</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Proceedings of pHealth 2015 Conference on Wearable Micro and Nano Technologies for Personalized Health</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/56254/proceedings-of-phealth-2015-conference-on/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/56254/proceedings-of-phealth-2015-conference-on/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This book presents the proceedings of pHealth 2015, the 12th International Conference on Wearable Micro and Nano Technologies for Personalized Health, held in V&auml;ster&aring;s, Sweden, in June 2015. </span></p>
<p><span>The conference addressed mobile technologies, knowledge-driven applications and computer-assisted decision support, as well as apps designed to support the elderly and those with chronic conditions in their daily lives. </span></p>
<p><span>The 23 conference papers, three keynotes and two specially invited contributions included here address the fundamental scientific and methodological challenges of adaptive, autonomous and intelligent pHealth approaches.</span></p>
<p><span>This book is open access until the 11 June 2015</span></p>
<p><a href="http://ebooks.iospress.nl/volume/phealth-2015-proceedings-of-the-12th-international-conference-on-wearable-micro-and-nano-technologies-for-personalized-health-2-4-june-2015-vaumlsterarings-swed" target="_blank"><span>http://ebooks.iospress.nl/volume/phealth-2015-proceedings-of-the-12th-international-conference-on-wearable-micro-and-nano-technologies-for-personalized-health-2-4-june-2015-vaumlsterarings-swed</span></a></p>
<p><span>Blobel, B., et al. (Eds.). (2015).&nbsp;pHealth 2015.&nbsp;<em>Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 211</em>.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-05-29 11:14:02.471</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Advanced decision support system for older adults</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/56045/advanced-decision-support-system-for-older/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/56045/advanced-decision-support-system-for-older/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-05-21 09:01:46.275</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>&#039;My Kidneys, My Choice, Decision Aid&#039;: Supporting shared decision making</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/56014/my-kidneys-my-choice-decision-aid-supporting/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/56014/my-kidneys-my-choice-decision-aid-supporting/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-05-20 11:22:19.593</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>New App successful in improving trauma care</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/55358/new-app-successful-in-improving-trauma-care/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/55358/new-app-successful-in-improving-trauma-care/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Royal Australasian College of Surgeons media release, 21 April 2015</em></p>
<p>Trauma specialists at Sydney&rsquo;s Westmead hospital have been trialling a new digital application (App) to assist in the quick decision-making needed to treat patients, according to an <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.12945/pdf" target="_blank">article from the latest <em>ANZ Journal of Surgery</em></a>, released by the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS).</p>
<p>The app, which was released on trial at the start of the year, contains 32 distinct algorithms on single page flow diagrams, using pinch and zoom options as well as jump-words and pop-ups for rapid access to information.</p>
<p>The app was designed to translate existing information into an easily accessible content across multiple platforms.</p>
<p>In the four months following its launch it has been downloaded 733 times and rated 4.5 out of 5 stars, with a small fee applied to allow for updates.</p>
<p>The objective of the app was to allow easy real-time access to trauma algorithms, and therefore reduce omissions or errors. Funding came from a New South Wales Motor Accidents Authority grant and took six months to develop.</p>
<p>Trauma Specialist and study author Jeremy Hsu said a key factor influencing the decision for developing the app was the staffing profile within the hospital, with senior consultants not available on-site 24 hours a day.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Systems must be created to ensure the best care for the patient, irrespective of the level of attending medical expertise.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;The algorithms and app have been formulated to provide a safe reproducible framework for the management of trauma patients,&rdquo; Dr Hsu said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The best trauma care lends itself to standardised practice and the widespread use of digital health technology has provided us with opportunities to provide more effective and efficient trauma care.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-04-27 14:36:00.818</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A generic integrated health care model</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54456/a-generic-integrated-health-care-model/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54456/a-generic-integrated-health-care-model/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-03-23 14:05:10.503</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cluster randomized controlled trial of TIA electronic decision support in primary care</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54447/cluster-randomized-controlled-trial-of-tia/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/54447/cluster-randomized-controlled-trial-of-tia/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-03-23 10:38:53.747</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Implementing a QCancer risk tool into general practice consultations: An exploratory study using simulated consultations with Australian general practitioners</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/53948/implementing-a-qcancer-risk-tool-into-general/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/53948/implementing-a-qcancer-risk-tool-into-general/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<div>
<p class="follows-h4">This Australian study explored the use of a cancer risk tool, which implements the QCancer model, in general practitioner consultations and its potential impact on clinical decision making.</p>
</div>
<p class="follows-h4">The risk tool was perceived by participating GPs as being potentially useful for patients with complex histories. More experienced GPs were distrustful of the risk output, especially when it conflicted with their clinical judgement. Variable interpretation of symptoms meant that there was significant variation in risk assessment.</p>
<p class="follows-h4">To access a free full-text version of the article, go to: <a href="http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/bjc201546a.html" target="_blank">http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/bjc201546a.html</a></p>
<p class="follows-h4">Chiang, P. P-C., et al. (2015). Implementing a QCancer risk tool into general practice consultations: An exploratory study using simulated consultations with Australian general practitioners. <em>B</em><em>ritish Journal of Cancer,</em> Advance online publication, 3&nbsp;March&nbsp;2015, doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.46.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-03-05 10:58:03.39</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The cost-effectiveness of patient decision aids: A systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50454/the-cost-effectiveness-of-patient-decision/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50454/the-cost-effectiveness-of-patient-decision/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The authors reviewed the economic evidence from <span>patient decision aids (PtDA)&nbsp;</span>trials.</p>
<p>Twenty-nine studies were included. "Only one economic evaluation of a PtDA has been completed, which found a PtDA to be cost-saving in women with menorrhagia. Other studies included in the review indicated that PtDAs will likely increase up-front costs, but in some contexts may reduce short-term costs by reducing the uptake of invasive treatments, such as elective surgery. Few studies comprehensively captured long-term costs or measured benefits in a manner conducive to economic evaluation (QALYs or general health utilities)".</p>
<p>The authors conclude that "... policy makers currently have insufficient economic evidence to appropriately consider their investments in PtDAs".</p>
<p><span>Now available to read in free full text at:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2014.09.002" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1016/j.hjdsi.2014.09.002</span></a><span>&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>Trenaman, L., et al. (2014).&nbsp;The cost-effectiveness of patient decision aids: A systematic review.&nbsp;<em>Healthcare,&nbsp;2</em>(4), 251&ndash;257.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-02-10 08:35:29.43</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Facilitators and barriers of implementing the chronic care model in primary care: A systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/53251/facilitators-and-barriers-of-implementing/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/53251/facilitators-and-barriers-of-implementing/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The Chronic Care Model (CCM) is a framework developed to redesign care delivery for individuals living with chronic diseases in primary care. The CCM and its various components have been widely adopted and evaluated, however, little is known about different primary care experiences with its implementation, and the factors that influence its successful uptake.</p>
<p>The purpose of this review is to synthesise findings of studies that implemented the CCM in primary care, in order to identify facilitators and barriers encountered during implementation.</p>
<p>This review identified barriers and facilitators of implementation across various primary care settings in 22 studies.&nbsp;The major emerging themes were those related to the inner setting of the organisation, the process of implementation and characteristics of the individual healthcare providers. These included: organisational culture, its structural characteristics, networks and communication, implementation climate and readiness, presence of supportive leadership, and provider attitudes and beliefs.</p>
<p>The authors conclude that these findings highlight the importance of assessing organisational capacity and needs prior to and during the implementation of the CCM, as well as gaining a better understanding of health care providers' and organisational perspective.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and is available to read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-014-0219-0" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1186/s12875-014-0219-0</span></a></p>
<p>Kadu, M. &amp; Stolee, P. (2015).&nbsp;Facilitators and barriers of implementing the chronic care model in primary care: A systematic review.&nbsp;<em>BMC Family Practice, 16</em>:12.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-02-09 08:47:46.613</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Effectiveness of computerised decision support systems linked to electronic health records: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52864/effectiveness-of-computerised-decision-support/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52864/effectiveness-of-computerised-decision-support/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p class="first">The authors systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of computerised decision support systems (CDSSs) featuring rule- or algorithm-based software integrated with electronic health records (EHRs) and evidence-based knowledge.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Twenty-eight<span>&nbsp;randomised controlled trials</span> were included and, based on their analysis, the authors conclude that, "across clinical settings, new generation CDSSs integrated with EHRs do not affect mortality and might moderately improve morbidity outcomes".</p>
<p>This article is available to read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302164" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.2105/AJPH.2014.302164</span></a></p>
<p>Moja, L., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Effectiveness of computerized decision support systems linked to electronic health records: A systematic review and meta-analysis.&nbsp;<em>American Journal of Public Health, 104</em>(12), e12-e22.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-01-22 15:07:12.034</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Effect of a computer-guided, quality improvement program for cardiovascular disease risk management in primary health care... (Australia)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52769/effect-of-a-computer-guided-quality-improvement/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52769/effect-of-a-computer-guided-quality-improvement/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This parallel arm cluster-randomized controlled trial in 60 Australian primary healthcare centers, tested whether a multifaceted quality improvement intervention comprised of computerized decision support, audit/feedback tools, and staff training improved firstly, guideline-indicated risk factor measurements and secondly, guideline-indicated medications for those at high cardiovascular disease risk.</p>
<p>The study found that in these healthcare settings, a computer-guided quality improvement intervention, requiring minimal support, improved cardiovascular disease risk measurement but did not increase prescription rates in the high-risk group. <br /><br />To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001235" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001235</a> or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</p>
<p>Peiris, D., et al. (2015). Effect of a computer-guided, quality improvement program for cardiovascular disease risk management in primary health care: The treatment of cardiovascular risk using electronic decision support cluster-randomized trial. <em>Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality &amp; Outomes</em>, Published online before print 13 January 2015, doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001235.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-01-16 10:56:16.194</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Decision aids for cancer screening and treatment - A comparative effectiveness review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52562/decision-aids-for-cancer-screening-and-treatment/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52562/decision-aids-for-cancer-screening-and-treatment/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The authors appraised and synthesised evidence assessing the effectiveness of&nbsp;decision aids targeting health care consumers who face decisions about cancer screening or&nbsp;prevention, or early cancer treatment, particularly with regard to decision aid&nbsp;or patient characteristics that might function as effect modifiers. The authors also reviewed interventions&nbsp;targeting providers for promotion of shared decision making using decision aids.</p>
<p>Based on the results of the review, the authors conclude that "cancer-related decision aids have evolved over time, and there is considerable&nbsp;diversity in both format and available evidence. We found strong evidence that cancer-related&nbsp;decision aids increase knowledge without adverse impact on decisional conflict or anxiety. We&nbsp;found moderate- or low-strength evidence that patients using decision aids are more likely to&nbsp;make informed decisions, have accurate risk perceptions, make choices that best agree with their&nbsp;values, and not remain undecided.&nbsp;This review adds to the literature that the effectiveness of cancer-related decision aids does&nbsp;not appear to be modified by specific attributes of decision aid delivery format, content, or other&nbsp;characteristics of their development and implementation. Very limited information was available&nbsp;on other outcomes or on the effectiveness of interventions that target providers to promote shared&nbsp;decision making by means of decision aids".</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 15.5555562973022px; line-height: 22.1666679382324px;">This systematic review was conducted&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 15.5555562973022px; line-height: 22.1666679382324px;">under contract to the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 15.5555562973022px; line-height: 22.1666679382324px;">The report is available to download and read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/search-for-guides-reviews-and-reports/?productid=2029&amp;pageaction=displayproduct" target="_blank">http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/search-for-guides-reviews-and-reports/?productid=2029&amp;pageaction=displayproduct</a></span></p>
<p>Trikalinos TA, Wieland LS, Adam GP, Zgodic A, Ntzani EE. (2014).&nbsp;Decision aids for cancer screening and treatment&nbsp;. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 145. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2015-01-08 13:16:55.612</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Nurses’ use of clinical decision support: A literature review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52323/nurses-use-of-clinical-decision-support-a/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52323/nurses-use-of-clinical-decision-support-a/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>In this literature review, the authors investigated nurses&rsquo; use of clinical decision support systems. </span></p>
<p><span>Common themes include: nurse factors affecting usage; patient factors affecting usage; technology and design factors affecting usage; and organisational factors affecting usage. "Two major implications are that these systems may not be designed to support nursing practice and may not be having the intended effect on patient care and quality".</span></p>
<p><span><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000110" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1097/CIN.0000000000000110</span></a></span><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>Piscotty, R. and Kalisch, B. (2014).&nbsp;Nurses&rsquo; use of clinical decision support: A literature review.&nbsp;<em>CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing,&nbsp;32</em>(12), 562-568</span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-18 11:47:36.204</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52089/ieee-journal-of-biomedical-and-health-informatics/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52089/ieee-journal-of-biomedical-and-health-informatics/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The <em>IEEE&nbsp;</em><em>Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (J-BHI)</em> publishes original papers describing recent advances in the field of biomedical and health informatics where information and communication technologies intersect with health, healthcare, life sciences and biomedicine. &nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span>Topics covered by <em>J-BHI</em> include: acquisition, transmission, storage, retrieval, management, processing and analysis of biomedical and health information; applications of information and communication technologies in the practice of healthcare, public health, patient monitoring, preventive care, early diagnosis of diseases,&nbsp; discovery of new therapies, and patient specific treatment protocols leading to improved outcomes; and the integration of electronic medical and health records, methods of longitudinal data analysis, data mining and discovery tools.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-10 12:30:55.398</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Transient ischaemic attack and stroke electronic decision support to improve stroke care in New Zealand</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52065/transient-ischaemic-attack-and-stroke-electronic/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/52065/transient-ischaemic-attack-and-stroke-electronic/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-12-10 08:46:11.27</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A computational approach to primary healthcare information quality indicators</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51494/a-computational-approach-to-primary-healthcare/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/51494/a-computational-approach-to-primary-healthcare/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-11-18 09:14:29.005</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Integrated Operations Centre goes live at Capital &amp; Coast</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50930/integrated-operations-centre-goes-live-at/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50930/integrated-operations-centre-goes-live-at/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Capital &amp; Coast staff celebrated a new era for patient care and staffing this week with the launch of a new Integrated Operations Centre for Kenepuru and Wellington Hospitals.</p>
<p>An integrated operations centre (IOC) is a central hub from where the day&rsquo;s activity and responses are coordinated. It enables key teams to use real time information for clinical and operational decision making across the organisation.</p>
<p>To read the full media release from Capital and Coast DHB, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/GE1410/S00157/integrated-operations-centre-goes-live-at-capital-coast.htm" target="_blank">http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/GE1410/S00157/integrated-operations-centre-goes-live-at-capital-coast.htm</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-10-28 09:39:30.732</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50768/journal-of-evaluation-in-clinical-practice/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50768/journal-of-evaluation-in-clinical-practice/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The&nbsp;<em>Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice</em>&nbsp;is concerned with the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. Of particular interest to the Journal are articles on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including:&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>Evidence-based medicine</li>
<li>Clinical practice guidelines</li>
<li>Clinical decision making</li>
<li>Clinical services organisation</li>
<li>Implementation and delivery</li>
<li>Health economic evaluation</li>
<li>Health process</li>
<li>Outcome measurement and</li>
<li>New or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice.</li>
</ul>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-10-20 10:33:18.231</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people (Cochrane Review)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50476/interventions-to-improve-the-appropriate/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50476/interventions-to-improve-the-appropriate/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This updated review sought to determine which interventions, alone or in combination, are effective in improving the appropriate use of polypharmacy and reducing medication-related problems in older people (<span>65 years of age and older)</span>.</p>
<p>"Two studies were added to this review to bring the total number of included studies to 12. One intervention consisted of computerised decision support; 11 complex, multi-faceted pharmaceutical approaches to interventions were provided in a variety of settings. Interventions were delivered by healthcare professionals, such as prescribers and pharmacists".</p>
<p>Based on their analysis, the authors conclude that "it is unclear whether interventions to improve appropriate polypharmacy, such as pharmaceutical care, resulted in clinically significant improvement; however, they appear beneficial in terms of reducing inappropriate prescribing".</p>
<p>Available to read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008165.pub3" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1002/14651858.CD008165.pub3</span></a></p>
<p>Patterson, S.M., Cadogan, C.A., Kerse, N., Cardwell, C.R., Bradley, M.C., Ryan, C., Hughes, C. (2014). Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people. <em>Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10</em>, CD008165.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-10-08 08:45:24.381</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>e-Health – for continuity of care (proceedings of the 25th European Medical Informatics Conference)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50130/e-health-for-continuity-of-care-proceedings/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/50130/e-health-for-continuity-of-care-proceedings/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This e-book presents the proceedings of the 25th European Medical Informatics Conference, held in Istanbul, Turkey in August/September 2014. The conference aims to describe the most recent developments in biomedical informatics. </span></p>
<p><span>The book is divided into 15 sections, which include: decision support systems and clinical practice guidelines; improved healthcare through informatics; data analysis; mobile health; technology and system evaluation; and text mining. The final two sections present posters from the conference.</span></p>
<p><span>This e-book is open access and the content can be downloaded and read in full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://ebooks.iospress.nl/volume/e-health-for-continuity-of-care-proceedings-of-mie2014" target="_blank">http://ebooks.iospress.nl/volume/e-health-for-continuity-of-care-proceedings-of-mie2014</a></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-09-24 10:08:34.413</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>An audit of anticoagulant management to assess anticoagulant control using decision support software</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49717/an-audit-of-anticoagulant-management-to-assess/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49717/an-audit-of-anticoagulant-management-to-assess/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-09-05 11:28:16.425</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Giving Asthma Support to Patients (GASP): A novel online asthma education, monitoring, assessment and management tool</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49625/giving-asthma-support-to-patients-gasp-a/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49625/giving-asthma-support-to-patients-gasp-a/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-09-03 08:58:25.711</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Interventions to reduce pediatric medication errors: A systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49110/interventions-to-reduce-pediatric-medication/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/49110/interventions-to-reduce-pediatric-medication/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of interventions to reduce pediatric medication errors.</p>
<p>Sixty-three studies were included. The authors identify a number of research gaps, and many studies showed <span>methodologic heterogeneity and&nbsp;</span>an appreciable risk of bias. "Studies of computerized provider order entry with clinical decision support compared with studies without clinical decision support reported a 36% to 87% reduction in prescribing errors; studies of preprinted order sheets revealed a 27% to 82% reduction in prescribing errors".</p>
<p>The authors conclude that "pediatric medication errors can be reduced, although our understanding of optimal interventions remains hampered. Research should focus on understudied areas, use standardized definitions and outcomes, and evaluate cost-effectiveness".</p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3531" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1542/peds.2013-3531</span></a><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>
<p>Rinke, M.L., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Interventions to reduce pediatric medication errors: A systematic review. <em>Pediatrics, 134</em>(2), 338-360.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-08-13 09:41:03.864</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cost effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for parents deciding about MMR vaccination: A three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48872/cost-effectiveness-of-a-web-based-decision/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/48872/cost-effectiveness-of-a-web-based-decision/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>In this evaluation, the authors&nbsp;assess the cost effectiveness of a web-based decision aid to increase uptake of the MMR vaccine that was being tested in a cluster randomised-controlled trial in urban GP practices in the north of England. Parents received the&nbsp;decision aid, a leaflet, or usual practice.</p>
<p>The authors conclude from their analysis that the decision aid had a "... high chance of being cost effective, regardless of the value placed on obtaining additional vaccinations. It also appears to offer an efficient means of decision support for parents".</p>
<p>Available to read in full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://bjgp.org/content/64/625/e493.long" target="_blank">http://bjgp.org/content/64/625/e493.long</a></p>
<p>Tubeuf, S., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Cost effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for parents deciding about MMR vaccination: A three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. <em>British Journal of General Practice, 64</em>(625), e493-e499.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-08-01 09:43:07.982</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Using the Red/Yellow/Green Discharge Tool to improve the timeliness of hospital discharges (USA)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47289/using-the-red-yellow-green-discharge-tool/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47289/using-the-red-yellow-green-discharge-tool/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>As part of Yale-New Haven Hospital (Connecticut)'s Safe Patient Flow Initiative, the Red/Yellow/Green (RYG) Discharge Tool was developed, an electronic medical record-based prompt to identify the likelihood of patients' next-day discharge: green (very likely), yellow (possibly), and red (unlikely).</p>
<p>The tool's purpose was to enhance communication with nursing/care coordination and trigger earlier discharge steps for patients identified as &ldquo;green&rdquo; or &ldquo;yellow.&rdquo; Analysis of the use of the tool found that it did help facilitate earlier discharges, but accuracy depended on placement in daily work flow and experience of the user.</p>
<p><span class="Abstract 0">To read the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/jcaho/jcjqs/2014/00000040/00000006/art00001" target="_blank">http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/jcaho/jcjqs/2014/00000040/00000006/art00001</a> or contact your DHB library, or local or organisational library for assistance.</span></p>
<p>Mathews, K. S., et al. (2014). Using the Red/Yellow/Green Discharge Tool to improve the timeliness of hospital discharges. <em>Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 40</em> (6), 243.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-05-16 11:27:50.673</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Electronic patient journey boards a vital piece of the puzzle in patient flow (Australia)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47224/electronic-patient-journey-boards-a-vital/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/47224/electronic-patient-journey-boards-a-vital/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The aim of this case study is to describe the features and application of electronic patient journey boards (EPJBs) to help accelerate patient flow in Queensland Health hospitals. It was found that patient length of stay reduced and display of estimated discharge dates improved with the introduction of EPJBs along with improved communication and information management resulting in time savings from 20&nbsp;min per staff member per shift to 2.5&nbsp;hours per ward a day.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/AH13192.htm" target="_blank">http://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/AH13192.htm</a> or contact your local, DHB or organisational library for assistance.</p>
<p>Clark, K. W., Moller, S., &amp; O'Brien, L. (2014).&nbsp;Electronic patient journey boards a vital piece of the puzzle in patient flow. <em>Australian Health Review,&nbsp;<span>38</span></em>(3), 259-264.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-05-13 11:45:04.156</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Interactive tool to help older women decide on mammograms</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46532/interactive-tool-to-help-older-women-decide/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46532/interactive-tool-to-help-older-women-decide/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><em>NZ Breast Cancer Foundation media release, 9 April 2014</em></p>
<p>The NZ Breast Cancer Foundation today launched Screen70+, an interactive online decision aid to help women over 70 &ndash; and their GPs &ndash; decide if they should continue with screening mammograms.</p>
<p>Screen70+ is based on the work of Dr Mara Schonberg at Harvard Medical School. It looks at a woman&rsquo;s overall health and life expectancy, along with breast cancer risk and the pluses and minuses of screening.</p>
<p>Free screening with BreastScreen Aotearoa stops at age 69. In Australia, free mammogram screening was extended to age 74 last year, and in the UK, a large-scale trial of breast screening to age 73 is underway. The UK Public Health Office recently launched a &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t assume you&rsquo;re past it&rdquo; campaign aimed at women over 70.</p>
<p>To read the full media release on Scoop, go to: <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/GE1404/S00042/interactive-tool-to-help-older-women-decide-on-mammograms.htm" target="_blank">http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/GE1404/S00042/interactive-tool-to-help-older-women-decide-on-mammograms.htm</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-04-09 11:04:53.171</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Using standardized insulin orders to improve patient safety in a tertiary care centre (Canada)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46392/using-standardized-insulin-orders-to-improve/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46392/using-standardized-insulin-orders-to-improve/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The aim of the study was to standardise insulin prescribing practices for inpatients, improve management of hypoglycemia, reduce reliance on sliding scales, increase use of basal-bolus insulin and improve patient safety. Patients with diabetes were admitted to 2 pilot inpatient units, followed by a spread of the study to all insulin-treated patients on noncritical care units in a Canadian tertiary care multicampus teaching hospital. Standardised preprinted insulin and hypoglycemia management orders, decision support tools and multidisciplinary education strategies were developed, tested and implemented by way of the Model for Improvement and The Ottawa Model for Research Process. Results of the process indicated that patient safety was improved through a reduction in hypoglycemia and decreased dependence on correctional scales. Utilisation of the preprinted orders approached the target of 70% at the end of the test period and was sustained at 89% 3 years post-implementation.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.canadianjournalofdiabetes.com/article/S1499-2671%2814%2900004-5/abstract" target="_blank">http://www.canadianjournalofdiabetes.com/article/S1499-2671%2814%2900004-5/abstract</a> or contact your local, DHB or organsational library for assistance.</p>
<p>Doyle, M., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Using standardized insulin orders to improve patient safety in a tertiary care centre. <em>Canadian Journal of Diabetes</em>, 38 (2), 118-125.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-04-02 13:57:25.918</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Derivation of a clinical decision instrument to identify adult patients with mild traumatic intracranial hemorrhage at low risk for requiring ICU admission</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46020/derivation-of-a-clinical-decision-instrument/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/46020/derivation-of-a-clinical-decision-instrument/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The objective of this prospective, observational study from the USA was to derive a clinical decision instrument (with a sensitivity of at least 95%) to identify adult emergency department patients with mild traumatic intracranial hemorrhage who are at low risk for requiring critical care resources during hospitalisation and thus may not need admission to the ICU.</p>
<p>The instrument consisted of 4 predictor variables: admission GCS score less than 15, nonisolated head injury, aged 65 years or older, and evidence of swelling or shift on initial cranial computed tomography scan. The decision instrument identified 114 of 116 patients requiring an acute critical care intervention if at least 1 variable was present and 192 of 484 patients who did not have an acute critical care intervention if no variables were present. Physician clinical impression was slightly less sensitive but overall similar to the clinical decision instrument. The authors conclude that their clinical decision instrument identifies a subset of patients with mild traumatic intracranial hemorrhage who are at low risk for acute critical care intervention and thus may not require ICU admission.</p>
<p><span class="spacey">To read the full abstract, and for access to a free full text version of the article, go to:</span> <a href="http://www.annemergmed.com/article/S0196-0644%2813%2901557-6/fulltext" target="_blank"><span>http://www.annemergmed.com/article/S0196-0644%2813%2901557-6/fulltext</span></a></p>
<p><span>Nishijima, D. K., et al. (2014). Derivation of a clinical decision instrument to identify adult patients with mild traumatic intracranial hemorrhage at low risk for requiring ICU admission. <em>Annals of Emergency Medicine</em>, 63 (4), 448-456.<br /></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-03-24 13:54:09.83</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Practices to prevent venous thromboembolism: A brief review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/45121/practices-to-prevent-venous-thromboembolism/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/45121/practices-to-prevent-venous-thromboembolism/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<div id="sec-1" class="subsection">
<p id="p-2">Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of preventable harm for hospitalised patients. The authors reviewed key articles to assess the efficacy of different types of interventions to improve prescription of VTE prophylaxis for hospitalised patients.</p>
<p>Sixteen articles were included in this review. Two studies employed education only, four implemented paper based tools, four used computerised tools, two evaluated audit and feedback strategies, and four studies used combinations of intervention types. Individual modalities result in improved prescription of VTE prophylaxis; however, the greatest and most sustained improvements were those that combined education with computerised tools.</p>
</div>
<div id="sec-4" class="subsection">
<p id="p-5">The authors conclude that many intervention types have proven effective to different degrees in improving VTE prevention. They go on to say that provider education is likely a required additional component and should be combined with other intervention types. Active mandatory tools are likely more effective than passive ones. Information technology tools that are well integrated into provider workflow, such as alerts and computerised clinical decision support, can improve best practice prophylaxis use and prevent patient harm resulting from VTE.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and can be read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/23/3/187.full" target="_blank">http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/23/3/187.full</a></p>
<p>Lau, B.D. &amp; Haut, E.R. (2014). Practices to prevent venous thromboembolism: A brief review.&nbsp;<em>BMJ Quality &amp; Safety, 23</em>, 187-195.</p>
</div>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-02-11 08:31:42.953</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Undetermined impact of patient decision support interventions on healthcare costs and savings: Systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44957/undetermined-impact-of-patient-decision-support/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44957/undetermined-impact-of-patient-decision-support/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p id="p-2">In this systematic review, the authors investigated studies that assessed the potential of patient decision support interventions (decision aids) to generate savings.</p>
<p id="p-3">Studies were included if they contained quantitative economic data, including savings, spending, costs, cost effectiveness analysis, cost benefit analysis, or resource utilization. The authors excluded studies that lacked quantitative data on savings, costs, monetary value, and/or resource utilization.</p>
<p id="p-6">The authors included seven studies with eight analyses. Of these seven studies, four analyses predicted system-wide savings, with two analyses from the same study. The predicted savings range from $8 (&pound;5, &euro;6) to $3068 (&pound;1868, &euro;2243) per patient. Larger savings accompanied reductions in treatment utilization rates. The impact on utilization rates was mixed. Authors used heterogeneous methods to allocate costs and calculate savings. Quality scores were low to moderate, and risk of bias across the studies was moderate to high, with studies predicting the most savings having the highest risk of bias. The range of issues identified in the studies included the relative absence of sensitivity analyses, the absence of incremental cost effectiveness ratios, and short time periods.</p>
<p id="p-7">The authors conclude that, although there is evidence to show that patients choose more conservative approaches when they become better informed, there is insufficient evidence, as yet, to be confident that the implementation of patient decision support interventions leads to system-wide savings. Further work&mdash;with sensitivity analyses, longer time horizons, and more contexts&mdash;is required to avoid premature or unrealistic expectations that could jeopardize implementation and lead to the loss of already proved benefits.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and can be read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g188" target="_blank"><span>http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g188</span></a></p>
<p><abbr title="bmj.com">Walsh, T., et al. (2014).&nbsp;Undetermined impact of patient decision support interventions on healthcare costs and savings: Systematic review <em>BMJ,&nbsp;</em></abbr><em>348</em>:g188.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-02-03 14:41:29.716</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (Cochrane review)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44850/decision-aids-for-people-facing-health-treatment/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/44850/decision-aids-for-people-facing-health-treatment/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This review&nbsp;assessed the effects of decision aids for people facing treatment or screening decisions.</p>
<p>Based on their analysis, the author conclude that "... there is high-quality evidence that decision aids compared to usual care improve people's knowledge regarding options, and reduce their decisional conflict related to feeling uninformed and unclear about their personal values. There is moderate-quality evidence that decision aids compared to usual care stimulate people to take a more active role in decision making, and improve accurate risk perceptions when probabilities are included in decision aids, compared to not being included. There is low-quality evidence that decision aids improve congruence between the chosen option and the patient's values.</p>
<p>New for this updated review is further evidence indicating more informed, values-based choices, and improved patient-practitioner communication. There is a variable effect of decision aids on length of consultation. Consistent with findings from the previous review, decision aids have a variable effect on choices. They reduce the choice of discretionary surgery and have no apparent adverse effects on health outcomes or satisfaction".</p>
<p>This article is available to read in full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4/full" target="_blank">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4/full</a></p>
<p>Stacey D, L&eacute;gar&eacute; F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L, Wu JHC. (2014). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. <em>Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1</em>, CD001431</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2014-01-29 10:07:40.03</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>“Many miles to go …”: a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43941/many-miles-to-go-a-systematic-review-of-the/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43941/many-miles-to-go-a-systematic-review-of-the/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The aim of this review was to search for and analyze the findings of published peer-reviewed studies that investigated the success levels of strategies or methods where attempts were made to&nbsp;</span><em>implement</em><span>&nbsp;patient-targeted decision support interventions into routine clinical settings.</span></p>
<p>Seventeen studies were included and subjected to data extraction. The approach used in all studies was one where clinicians and their staff used a referral model, asking eligible patients to use decision support. The results point to significant challenges to the implementation of patient decision support using this model, including indifference on the part of health care professionals. This indifference stemmed from a reported lack of confidence in the content of decision support interventions and concern about disruption to established workflows, ultimately contributing to organizational inertia regarding their adoption.</p>
<p>The authors conclude that it seems too early to make firm recommendations about how best to implement patient decision support into routine practice because approaches that use a &lsquo;referral model&rsquo; consistently report difficulties. "We sense that the underlying issues that militate against the use of patient decision support and, more generally, limit the adoption of shared decision making, are under-investigated and under-specified. Future reports from implementation studies could be improved by following guidelines, for example the SQUIRE proposals, and by adopting methods that would be able to go beyond the &lsquo;barriers&rsquo; and &lsquo;facilitators&rsquo; approach to understand more about the nature of professional and organizational resistance to these tools. The lack of incentives that reward the use of these interventions needs to be considered as a significant impediment".</p>
<p><span>This is an open access article that is available to read in free full text at: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S14" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/<span>10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S14</span></a></span></p>
<p><span><span><span>This article is part of the supplement:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmedinformdecismak/supplements/13/S2" target="_blank">The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaborations Quality Dimensions: Theoretical Rationales, Current Evidence, and Emerging Issues</a></span></span></p>
<p><span>&nbsp;Elwyn, G., et al. (2013).&nbsp;&ldquo;Many miles to go &hellip;&rdquo;: a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice.&nbsp;<em>BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13,&nbsp;</em><span>(Suppl 2):S14</span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-12-02 09:44:31.232</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Computerized advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice (Cochrane review)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43499/computerized-advice-on-drug-dosage-to-improve/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/43499/computerized-advice-on-drug-dosage-to-improve/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This Cochrane review investigated whether computerised advice on drug dosage has beneficial effects on patient outcomes compared with routine care (empiric dosing without computer assistance).</span></p>
<p>Forty-six comparisons (from 42 trials) were included and the authors conclude from the results of their analysis that&nbsp;computerised advice for drug dosage has some benefits.</p>
<p>"<span>When using the computer system, healthcare professionals prescribed appropriately higher doses of the drugs initially for aminoglycoside antibiotics and the correct drug dose was reached more quickly for oral anticoagulants. It significantly decreased thromboembolism (blood clotting) events for anticoagulants and tended to reduce unwanted effects for aminoglycoside antibiotics and anti-rejection drugs (although not an important difference). It tended to reduce the length of hospital stay compared with routine care with comparable or better cost-effectiveness"</span></p>
<p>However, there were no effects on mortality or other clinical adverse events for insulin, anaesthetic agents, anti-rejection drugs and antidepressants.</p>
<p>The authors point to the low quality of the studies, and note that these results must be interpreted with caution.</p>
<p>The article is available to read in free full text at: &nbsp;<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD002894.pub3/full" target="_blank">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD002894.pub3/full</a></p>
<p><span>Gillaizeau F, Chan E, Trinquart L, Colombet I, Walton RT, R&egrave;ge-Walther M, Burnand B, Durieux P. (2013). Computerized advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice. <em>Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11</em>, CD002894.</span><span><span><span><br /></span></span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-11-14 10:33:57.569</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Techniques to aid the implementation of novel clinical information systems: A systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/41153/techniques-to-aid-the-implementation-of-novel/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/41153/techniques-to-aid-the-implementation-of-novel/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This systematic review identified five techniques that aid the implementation of novel clinical information systems (CIS) within healthcare: system piloting, eliciting acceptance, use of simulation, training and education, and provision of incentives.</p>
<p id="abspara0025">The authors note that the variable endpoints in studies and non-comparable study designs mean that the evidence base needs further developing. The authors discuss the potential role of simulation and clinical leadership in CIS implementation.</p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.journal-surgery.net/article/S1743-9191(13)00178-7/abstract">http://www.journal-surgery.net/article/S1743-9191(13)00178-7/abstract</a></span><span>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>
<p>Kelay, T., et al. (2013).&nbsp;<span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.33;">Techniques to aid the implementation of novel clinical information systems: A systematic review. <em>International Journal of Surgery,&nbsp;11(9), </em>783-791</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-08-06 09:41:03.605</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Improving hospital care of critically ill patients</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40779/improving-hospital-care-of-critically-ill/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40779/improving-hospital-care-of-critically-ill/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><em>University of Canterbury media release, 22 July 2013</em></p>
<p>University of Canterbury researchers are trialling mathematical models to help intensive care unit medical staff monitor patients&rsquo; lung conditions.</p>
<p>Each year up to 8000 patients with lung failure are admitted to New Zealand&nbsp; hospital intensive care units&nbsp; for breathing support using mechanical ventilation which is&nbsp; costly, UC mechanical engineering PhD student Yeong Chiew says.</p>
<p>"However, patient condition and response to treatment is different for every patient. Clinicians often rely on intuition and experience to select the most suitable mechanical ventilation method for each patient leading to variable care that can expose patients to sub-optimal mechanical ventilation resulting in further risk of lung injury.</p>
<p>"As a result, patient care can be variable and costly, affecting the quality of patient care and clinical outcomes. In particular, ventilated patients stay 70 per cent longer in ICU and cost 140 per cent more than other patients, indicating the potential for improving care.</p>
<p>"Providing mechanical ventilation for New Zealand ICU patients costs an extra $15 million a year. One of the main issues is that doctors may not have appropriate tools to assess a patient&rsquo;s exact lung condition at the bedside.</p>
<p>"Chest radiographs are not feasible and are invasive because of the radiation and the patients need to be transported out from ICU to a radiology lab every time assessment is required.</p>
<p>"We are using mathematical models to gauge patients&rsquo; lung conditions using already available data at the bedside. The models allow clinicians to effectively see inside the lung to gain a more accurate and exact picture of patient condition.</p>
<p>"Based on this mathematical modelling information, doctors can select the best individual ventilator settings in a consistent fashion every time.&rsquo;&rsquo;</p>
<p>The models have been retrospectively tested at Christchurch Hospital&rsquo;s ICU, as well as on data from collaborating overseas research groups.</p>
<p>The UC research, supervised by Professor Geoff Chase, plans in future to implement the models in larger clinical trial at Christchurch Hospital ICU to provide more patient-specific care, to optimise treatment and to improve outcomes for critically ill patients.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-07-22 09:50:05.85</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Waikato DHB implements internationally-recognised clinical pathway tool</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40760/waikato-dhb-implements-internationally-recognised/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40760/waikato-dhb-implements-internationally-recognised/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Waikato DHB media release, 19 July 2013</em></p>
<p>Waikato DHB is implementing an internationally recognised web-based software tool to improve the patient&rsquo;s journey through primary, secondary and tertiary care.</p>
<p>The tool, known as Map of Medicine, houses 300 clinical maps with 1100 pathways for patient care. These pathways allow clinicians from primary, secondary and tertiary care to access evidence-based local guidance and clinical decision support at the point of care.</p>
<p>Midland DHBs; Lakes, Taranaki, Tairawhiti and Bay of Plenty, have also agreed to implement Map of Medicine. There will be a region-wide roll-out and regionally agreed clinical pathways developed.</p>
<p>During a successful trial Midland Health Network has worked with Waikato DHB to develop a number of primary care pathways. Development of hospital pathways will complement the ongoing primary care pathway development.</p>
<p>Waikato DHB chief medical advisor Dr Tom Watson said the regionalised pathways provide significant benefits for both patients and clinicians.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Map of Medicine informs the whole of the journey from the GP to the secondary and tertiary facility and back to the GP. Everybody will be clear about the pathway for managing patients between these,&rdquo; he said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Our clinicians will potentially have less waste in time and scheduling, as they will have fewer patients coming in who have not had the appropriate investigations performed before a specialist sees them.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Participating in the Map of Medicine is a great opportunity to be part of an international clinical fraternity who are using Map of Medicine to provide better outcomes for their patients and increased value across the health sector.&rdquo;</p>
<p><strong>International input from Map of Medicine experts</strong></p>
<p>Visitors from Map of Medicine in the United Kingdom and Dubai came to Waikato Hospital yesterday (Thursday 18 July) to share their experiences how Map of Medicine is being used internationally.</p>
<p>UK Map of Medicine senior consultant Jennifer Dennington and Dubai Map of Medicine clinical programmes director Dr Mehmood Syed have already met with Healthshare and will meet with the Map of Medicine governance group today (Friday 19 July). The governance group includes representatives from primary and secondary care services from all five Midland DHBs; Lakes, Taranaki, Tairawhiti and Bay of Plenty.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The map will provide Midland primary, secondary and tertiary care facilities with a tool to help with the care delivered across the community. It provides an up-to-date evidence based guide to use as a reference tool,&rdquo; Dr Syed said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;So if you&rsquo;re a GP out in the community and you aren&rsquo;t sure how to treat a patient, you refer to the map, which gives you evidence based guidance that has been locally tailored to you particular area. This supports your decision on how the patient ought to be treated.&rdquo;<br />&ldquo;This will lead to better health outcomes for patients, and cost savings for the health economy.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Waikato DHB Map of Medicine project manager Graham Guy said the visit helped to cement understanding and identify further opportunities to make best use of the product as Waikato DHB and Midland DHBs look to roll it out.</p>
<p>Miss Dennington said it was great to see the enthusiasm from Waikato DHB.</p>
<p>&ldquo;We look forward to the relationship that we are starting and continuing. Graham and his team have got the knowledge that they need to run the Map of Medicine programme but we will always be here for support. We will share our experiences from our own areas and create a network to reach out to for advice,&rdquo; she said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The map will ultimately mean patients receive the right treatment at the right time and place.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Miss Dennington and Mr Syed came to New Zealand on Sunday and have visited the Ministry of Health and other DHBs across the country. They are travelling to Australia next week.</p>
<p>The map has been highly successful in UK and is also launching in countries across the Middle East.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-07-19 17:00:35.338</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>&#039;Distributed health literacy&#039;: Longitudinal qualitative analysis of the roles of health literacy mediators and social networks of people living with a long-term health condition (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40186/distributed-health-literacy-longitudinal/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/40186/distributed-health-literacy-longitudinal/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This study sought to explain the 'distributed' nature of health literacy and how people living with a long-term condition draw on their social network for support with health literacy-related tasks such as managing their condition, interacting with health professionals and making decisions about their health.</p>
<p>This paper reports a longitudinal qualitative interview and observation study of the development and practice of health literacy in people with long-term health conditions, living in South Wales, UK.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to: <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.12093/abstract" target="_blank">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.12093/abstract</a> or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</p>
<p>Edwards, M., et al. (2013). 'Distributed health literacy': longitudinal qualitative analysis of the roles of health literacy mediators and social networks of people living with a long-term health condition. <em>Health Expectations</em>, [published online 17 June 2013].</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-06-19 14:39:07.783</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Risk assessment to guide prostate cancer screening decisions: A cost-effectiveness analysis (Australia)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39996/risk-assessment-to-guide-prostate-cancer/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39996/risk-assessment-to-guide-prostate-cancer/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This study applied the most recent evidence from randomised trials of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening and explored the potential value of risk assessments to guide the use of PSA screening in practice.</p>
<p>The study used a decision model that incorporated a Markov process that was developed in 2012&nbsp;to estimate the net benefit and cost of PSA screening versus no screening as a function of baseline risk. The study found that the harms of screening outweighed the benefits under a number of plausible scenarios. Conclusions were sensitive to the estimated quality-of-life impacts of prostate cancer treatment as well as the incidence of cancers not detected by screening tests (poorer prognosis) and those that were detected by screening tests (better prognosis).</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for access to a free full text version of the article, go to: <a href="https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2013/198/10/risk-assessment-guide-prostate-cancer-screening-decisions-cost-effectiveness" target="_blank">https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2013/198/10/risk-assessment-guide-prostate-cancer-screening-decisions-cost-effectiveness</a></p>
<p>Martin, A. J., et al. (2013). Risk assessment to guide prostate cancer screening decisions: A cost-effectiveness analysis. <em>Medical Journal of Australia</em>, 198(10), 546-550.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-06-07 13:38:25.884</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Transient ischaemic attack and stroke risk: Pilot of a primary care electronic decision support tool</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39988/transient-ischaemic-attack-and-stroke-risk/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39988/transient-ischaemic-attack-and-stroke-risk/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-06-07 12:09:17.166</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Strengthening health information infrastructure for health care quality governance: Good practices, new opportunities and data privacy protection challenges (OECD)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39902/strengthening-health-information-infrastructure/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39902/strengthening-health-information-infrastructure/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Privacy-respectful uses of data for health, health care quality and health system performance monitoring and research must become widespread, regular activities.</p>
<p>This report is about the progress OECD countries have made in the development and linkage of health and health care data and in the development and use of data from electronic health record systems for statistics and research.</p>
<p>The <em>OECD Health Policy Brief</em> summarises the key findings of this OECD study<em>.</em></p>
<p>Access to the <em>Health Policy Brief</em>, as well as to the full <em>Report</em> are available at: <a href="http://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/strengtheninghealthinformationinfrastructure.htm" target="_blank">http://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/strengtheninghealthinformationinfrastructure.htm</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-06-04 12:53:35.884</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Perceived barriers of heart failure nurses and cardiologists in using clinical decision support systems in the treatment of heart failure patients (Netherlands)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39339/perceived-barriers-of-heart-failure-nurses/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39339/perceived-barriers-of-heart-failure-nurses/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) can support guideline adherence in heart failure patients. However, the use of CDSSs is limited and barriers in working with CDSSs have been described as a major obstacle.</p>
<p>The aims of this study were therefore to: 1. explore the type and number of perceived barriers of&nbsp;heart failure nurses and cardiologists to use a CDSS in the treatment of heart failure patients; 2. explore possible differences in perceived barriers between the two groups; and 3. assess the relevance and influence of knowledge management on Responsibility/Trust and Barriers/Threats.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for access to a free full text version of the article, go to: <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/13/54/abstract" target="_blank">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/13/54/abstract</a></p>
<p>de Vries, A. E., et al. (2013). Perceived barriers of heart failure nurses and cardiologists in using clinical decision support systems in the treatment of heart failure patients. <em>BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making</em>, 13:54.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-05-02 09:25:47.681</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Hazards to health: E-notification to your Medical Officer of Health</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39322/hazards-to-health-e-notification-to-your/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/39322/hazards-to-health-e-notification-to-your/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>bpac (NZ) is an independent organisation that promotes&nbsp;health care interventions which meet patients&rsquo; needs and&nbsp;are evidence based, cost effective and suitable for the New&nbsp;Zealand context.</p>
<p>They develop and distribute evidence based resources which&nbsp;describe, facilitate and help overcome the barriers to best&nbsp;practice.</p>
<p>In the April 2013 edition of their <em>Best Practice</em> <em>Journal</em>, they discuss a new electronic notification system that has been designed for general practices to report incidents related to exposures to hazardous substances. The system has been developed by bestpractice Decision Support (BPAC Inc) and the Centre for Public Health Research, and is funded by the Ministry of Health.</p>
<p>This is available to read in full text at: <a href="http://www.bpac.org.nz/BPJ/2013/April/hazards-to-health.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.bpac.org.nz/BPJ/2013/April/hazards-to-health.aspx</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-04-30 17:24:43.91</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Who should manage transient ischemic attacks? A comparison between stroke experts, generalists, and electronic decision support</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38902/who-should-manage-transient-ischemic-attacks/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38902/who-should-manage-transient-ischemic-attacks/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-04-05 14:59:26.903</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The use of personal digital assistants in clinical decision making by health care professionals: A systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38594/the-use-of-personal-digital-assistants-in/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38594/the-use-of-personal-digital-assistants-in/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This systematic review investigated the usefulness of <span>personal digital assistants (</span>PDAs) in the clinical setting. </span></p>
<p><span>Only three trials that were identified were of satisfactory quality. PDAs were used either in recording patient information or in decision support for diagnoses or treatment. The authors found reports of increased&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.33;">data collection quality and improved appropriateness of diagnosis and treatment decisions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.33;">However, evidence is limited and the authors conclude that reliable conclusions are not possible and further research is required to assess their value and ensure full benefits from their widespread use. They also note that the pace of technological development creates challenges for evaluation.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.33;"> Divall, P., et al. (2103).&nbsp;The use of personal digital assistants in clinical decision making by health care professionals: A systematic review. <em>Health Informatics Journal, 19</em>(1), 16-28.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.33;"><span>To view the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to:</span><br /><span><a href="http://jhi.sagepub.com/content/19/1/16.abstract" target="_blank">http://jhi.sagepub.com/content/19/1/16.abstract</a>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-03-19 12:55:39.396</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Challenges of the New Zealand healthcare disaster preparedness prior to the Canterbury earthquakes: A qualitative analysis</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38547/challenges-of-the-new-zealand-healthcare/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38547/challenges-of-the-new-zealand-healthcare/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-03-18 09:12:14.482</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>District health boards faced challenges prior to Christchurch quakes</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38535/district-health-boards-faced-challenges-prior/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38535/district-health-boards-faced-challenges-prior/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Source: <em>University of Otago press release, 15 March 2013</em></p>
<p>Before the Christchurch earthquakes, emergency preparedness at district health board-level in New Zealand faced challenges that they needed to overcome, suggests a University of Otago study published in the New Zealand Medical Journal today.</p>
<p>However, the study &ndash; the first to address the issue of strategic healthcare emergency preparedness in New Zealand - found that disaster preparedness was adequate to deal with a major emergency &ndash; as occurred in Christchurch.</p>
<p>The interview-based study of emergency planners at 16 District Health Boards specifically investigated healthcare disaster preparedness before the Canterbury earthquakes happened, between January and March 2010.&nbsp; Five DHBs declined to be involved in the study.</p>
<p>Lead author, University of Otago medical and PhD student Sultan Al-Shaqsi, says emergency planners highlighted several issues that concerned them, or that they felt could improve disaster preparedness.</p>
<p>These included the perception that clinical personnel were disinterested in emergency planning, the need for communication backup if emergency communication systems failed and the insufficient recognition given to the likely value of volunteers who tend to turn out in big numbers following major disasters such as the Christchurch earthquakes and the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States.</p>
<p>The researchers, also including Mr Al-Shaqsi&rsquo;s supervisors Associate Professor David McBride and Professor Robin Gauld of Otago&rsquo;s Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, concluded that despite these challenges which existed prior to the Christchurch earthquakes, New Zealand&rsquo;s healthcare preparedness was probably adequate a year out from the disaster.</p>
<p>Several of the challenges presented in the study were also reflected in an earlier review of the initial response to the February 2011 Canterbury earthquake, undertaken by Professor Mike Ardagh and colleagues at the University of Otago, Christchurch.</p>
<p>&ldquo;For example, they identified that backup systems for life-line services such as water, communication and electricity were significant challenges during the initial response,&rdquo; says Mr Al-Shaqsi.</p>
<p>&ldquo;They also emphasised the need for integrated planning of hospital and community based healthcare facilities to ensure that the appropriate response to the influx of injured people is unified, and also they found that management of volunteering was a challenge during the initial response.&rdquo;</p>
<p>The study concludes: &ldquo;Prior to the Canterbury earthquakes, healthcare disaster preparedness faced multiple challenges. Despite these challenges, New Zealand&rsquo;s healthcare response was adequate. Future preparedness has to take lessons learnt from the 2011 earthquakes to improve healthcare disaster planning in New Zealand.&rdquo;</p>
<p><strong>For more information, contact:</strong></p>
<p>Associate Professor David McBride<br /> Department of Preventive and Social Medicine<br /> University of Otago</p>
<p>To view the original press release, go to: <a href="http://www.otago.ac.nz/news/news/otago043361.html" target="_blank">http://www.otago.ac.nz/news/news/otago043361.html</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-03-15 10:57:22.017</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The eCHAT program to facilitate healthy changes in New Zealand primary care</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38471/the-echat-program-to-facilitate-healthy-changes/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38471/the-echat-program-to-facilitate-healthy-changes/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-03-12 11:56:22.369</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve diabetes management? A systematic review and meta-analysis</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38370/can-computerized-clinical-decision-support/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/38370/can-computerized-clinical-decision-support/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This systematic review investigates the effects of computerised clinical decision support systems in ambulatory diabetes management compared with a non-computerised approach.</p>
<p>Fifteen <span>randomised trials</span>&nbsp;were included (with 14 at moderate to high risk of bias due to methodological limitations). HbA1c, quality of life and hospitalisation all favoured the computerised clinical decision support systems over the control, although none were statistically significant. Triglycerides and practitioner performance tended to favour the computerised clinical decision support systems, however the results were too heterogeneous to pool.</p>
<p>The authors conclude that, while the computerised systems may marginally improve clinical outcomes, confidence in the evidence is low because of risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision.</p>
<p><span>To view the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to:</span><br /><span><a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.12087/abstract" target="_blank">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.12087/abstract</a>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></p>
<div id="dme12087-sec-0001" class="section">
<div class="para">
<p>Jeffery, R., et al. (2013). Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve diabetes management? A systematic review and meta-analysis.&nbsp;<em>Diabetic Medicine, 30</em>(6), 739-745.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="dme12087-sec-0004" class="section">&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-03-06 10:45:21.993</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Accuracy of the “traffic light” clinical decision rule for serious bacterial infections in young children with fever: A retrospective cohort study (Australia)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/37926/accuracy-of-the-traffic-light-clinical-decision/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/37926/accuracy-of-the-traffic-light-clinical-decision/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The objective of this Australian study was to determine the accuracy of a clinical decision rule (the traffic light system developed by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)) for detecting three common serious bacterial infections (urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and bacteraemia) in young febrile children.</span></p>
<p>The authors undertook a retrospective analysis of data from a two year prospective cohort study in a&nbsp;paediatric emergency department.</p>
<p>Based on the findings of their study, the authors conclude that t<span>he NICE traffic light system failed to identify a substantial proportion of serious bacterial infections, particularly urinary tract infections. The addition of urine analysis significantly improved test sensitivity, making the traffic light system a more useful triage tool for the detection of serious bacterial infections in young febrile children.</span></p>
<p><span>This is an open access article and is available to read in full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f866" target="_blank">http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f866</a></span></p>
<p><span>De, S., et al. (2013).&nbsp;Accuracy of the &ldquo;traffic light&rdquo; clinical decision rule for serious bacterial infections in young children with fever: A retrospective cohort study. <em>BMJ, 346</em>:f866.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-02-15 09:25:16.255</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Features of effective computerised clinical decision support systems: Meta-regression of 162 randomised trials</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/37925/features-of-effective-computerised-clinical/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/37925/features-of-effective-computerised-clinical/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The objective of this <span>meta-regression analysis of randomised controlled trials</span>, published in the <em>British Medical Journal</em>, was to identify factors that differentiate between effective and ineffective computerised clinical decision support systems in terms of improvements in the process of care or in patient outcomes.</p>
<p>Based on the results of thesir analysis, the authors conclude that there were&nbsp;several factors that could partially explain why some systems succeed and others fail. Presenting decision support within electronic charting or order entry systems are associated with failure compared with other ways of delivering advice. Odds of success were greater for systems that required practitioners to provide reasons when over-riding advice than for systems that did not. Odds of success were also better for systems that provided advice concurrently to patients and practitioners. Finally, most systems were evaluated by their own developers and such evaluations were more likely to show benefit than those conducted by a third party.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and is available to read in full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f657" target="_blank">http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f657</a></p>
<p>Roshanov, P. S., et al. (2013).&nbsp;Features of effective computerised clinical decision support systems: Meta-regression of 162 randomised trials.&nbsp;<em>BMJ, 346</em>:f657</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2013-02-15 09:17:08.593</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Why do clinicians not refer patients to online decision support tools? Interviews with front line clinics in the NHS (England)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/36896/why-do-clinicians-not-refer-patients-to-online/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/36896/why-do-clinicians-not-refer-patients-to-online/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<div id="sec-1" class="subsection">
<p id="p-2">The authors used <span>retrospective semistructured interviews and web server log analysis t</span>o assess whether clinical teams would direct patients to use web-based patient decision support interventions (DESIs) and whether patients would use them.</p>
</div>
<div id="sec-2" class="subsection">
<p id="p-3">Participants were 57 NHS professionals (nurses, doctors and others) in orthopaedic, antenatal, breast, urology clinics and in primary care practices across 22 NHS sites given access to DESIs hosted on the NHS Direct website.</p>
</div>
<div id="sec-4" class="subsection">
<p id="p-5">Fewer than expected patients were directed to use the web tools. The most significant obstacles to referral to the tools were the attitudes of clinicians and clinical teams. Technical problems contributed to the problems but the low uptake was mainly explained by clinicians&rsquo; limited understanding of how patient DESIs could be helpful in clinical pathways, their perception that &lsquo;shared decision-making&rsquo; was already commonplace and that, in their view, some patients are resistant to being involved in treatment decisions. External factors, such as efficiency targets and &lsquo;best practice&rsquo; recommendations were also cited being significant barriers. Clinicians did not feel the need to refer patients to use decision support tools, web-based or not, and, as a result, felt no requirement to change existing practice routines. Uptake is highest when clinicians set expectations that these tools are integral to practice and embed their use into clinical pathways.</p>
</div>
<div id="sec-5" class="subsection">
<p id="p-6">The authors conclude that existing evidence of patient benefit and the free availability of patient DESIs via the web are not sufficient drivers to achieve routine use. Health professionals were not motivated to refer patients to these interventions. Clinicians will not use these interventions simply because they are made available, despite good evidence of benefit to patients.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and is available to read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/2/6/e001530.full" target="_blank">http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/2/6/e001530.full</a></p>
<p>Elwyn, G., Rix, A., Holt, T. &amp; Jones, D. (2012).&nbsp;Why do clinicians not refer patients to online decision support tools? Interviews with front line clinics in the NHS. <em>BMJ Open, &nbsp;2</em>:e001530</p>
</div>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-12-03 09:43:16.771</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Clinical effectiveness of a patient decision aid to improve decision quality and glycaemic control in people with diabetes making treatment choices (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/36361/clinical-effectiveness-of-a-patient-decision/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/36361/clinical-effectiveness-of-a-patient-decision/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The aim of this <span>cluster randomised controlled trial was to&nbsp;</span>determine the effectiveness, in general practice, of a patient decision aid (PDA) to improve decision quality and glycaemic control in people with diabetes making treatment choices.</span></p>
<div id="sec-3" class="subsection">
<p id="p-4">Forty-nine general practices in UK were randomised into intervention (n=25) and control (n=24).</p>
</div>
<div id="sec-4" class="subsection">
<p id="p-5">The intervention involved brief training of clinicians and use of the PANDA PDA with patients in single consultation.</p>
</div>
<div id="sec-8" class="subsection">
<p id="p-9">The authors found that use of the PANDA decision aid reduces decisional conflict, improves knowledge, promotes realistic expectations and autonomy in people with diabetes making treatment choices in general practice.</p>
</div>
<p><span>This is an open access article and is available to read in full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/2/6/e001469.full">http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/2/6/e001469.full</a></span></p>
<p><span>Mathers, N., et al. (2012).&nbsp;Clinical effectiveness of a patient decision aid to improve decision quality and glycaemic control in people with diabetes making treatment choices: A cluster randomised controlled trial (PANDAs) in general practice. <em>BMJ Open,&nbsp;2</em>:e001469.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-11-07 08:48:40.19</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Introducing decision aids at Group Health was linked to sharply lower hip and knee surgery rates and costs (U.S.)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/35035/introducing-decision-aids-at-group-health/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/35035/introducing-decision-aids-at-group-health/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This observational study investigated the associations between introducing decision aids for hip and knee osteoarthritis (to&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 15.555556297302246px;">all orthopedic providers at Group Health, a health system covering more than 660,000 residents of Washington and Idaho), </span>and rates of joint replacement surgery and costs.</p>
<p><span>"Consistent with prior randomized trials, our introduction of decision aids was associated with 26&nbsp;percent fewer hip replacement surgeries, 38&nbsp;percent fewer knee replacements, and 12&ndash;21&nbsp;percent lower costs over six months. These findings support the concept that patient decision aids for some health conditions, for which treatment decisions are highly sensitive to both patients&rsquo; and physicians&rsquo; preferences, may reduce rates of elective surgery and lower costs".</span></p>
<p><span>This article is available to read in full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/31/9/2094.full">http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/31/9/2094.full</a></span></p>
<p><span>Arterburn, D., et al. (2012).&nbsp;Introducing decision aids at Group Health was linked to sharply lower hip and knee surgery rates and costs. <em>Health Affairs, 31</em>(9), 2094-2104.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-09-08 12:55:19.031</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>International Journal of Medical Informatics</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34945/international-journal-of-medical-informatics/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34945/international-journal-of-medical-informatics/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The <em>International Journal of Medical Informatics</em>&nbsp;provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics.&nbsp;</span>The <em>Journal</em> emphasises the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings.</p>
<p><span>The scope of the journal covers:</span></p>
<ul>
<li>Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician's office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardisation, systems integration etc.</li>
<li>Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc.</li>
<li>Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general.</li>
<li>Organisational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.</li>
</ul>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-09-04 09:10:15.531</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Advancing clinical decision support using lessons from outside of healthcare: An interdisciplinary systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34641/advancing-clinical-decision-support-using/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34641/advancing-clinical-decision-support-using/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>This study surveys <span>computerised decision support (DS) systems</span>&nbsp;experience across multiple non-healthcare disciplines for new insights that are generalizable to healthcare provider decisions. In particular, it sought design principles and lessons learned from the other disciplines that could inform efforts to accelerate the adoption of clinical decision support (CDS).</span></p>
<p><span><span>The authors identified seven high-level DS system design features from the nonhealthcare literature that could be applied to CDS: providing broad, system-level perspectives; customising interfaces to specific users and roles; making the DS reasoning transparent; presenting data effectively; generating multiple scenarios covering disparate outcomes (e.g., effective; effective with side effects; ineffective); allowing for contingent adaptations; and facilitating collaboration. The article provides examples of each feature.&nbsp;</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>This is an open access article and is available to read in free full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/12/90/abstract">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/12/90/abstract</a></span></span></p>
<p><span><span>Wu, H.W., et al. (2012).&nbsp;Advancing clinical decision support using lessons from outside of healthcare: An interdisciplinary systematic review. <em>BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making,&nbsp;12</em>:90 doi:10.1186/1472-6947-12-90</span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-08-20 11:30:57.536</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Clinical decision support systems in the care of inpatients with diabetes in non-critical care setting: Systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34626/clinical-decision-support-systems-in-the/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34626/clinical-decision-support-systems-in-the/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>The aim of this systematic review was to examine evidence for the use of clinical decision support systems in improving the care of hospitalised patients with diabetes in a non-critical care setting and to assess their effectiveness.</span></p>
<p><span><span>To view the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to:</span><br /><span><a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03540.x/abstract">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03540.x/abstract</a>&nbsp;or contact your DHB library, or organisational or local library for assistance.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>Nirantharakumar, K., Chen, Y. F., Marshall, T., Webber, J. and Coleman, J. J. (2012), Clinical decision support systems in the care of inpatients with diabetes in non-critical care setting: systematic review. <em>Diabetic Medicine, 29</em>:&nbsp;698&ndash;708.&nbsp;</span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-08-17 14:47:00.841</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Patient Psychology Research Review 1</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34221/patient-psychology-research-review-1/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/34221/patient-psychology-research-review-1/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>In the latest issue (attached below):</span></p>
<ul>
<li>Computerised decision aids prove useful</li>
<li>Pew internet survey</li>
<li>Evaluation of a &lsquo;perceived sensitivity to medicines&rsquo; scale</li>
<li>The reassuring value of diagnostic tests</li>
<li>Perception of provider time at bedside</li>
<li>Walking drawings and walking ability in children with cerebral palsy</li>
<li>Illness representation profiles predict use of healthcare services</li>
<li>Culturally appropriate storytelling improves BP</li>
<li>Helping patients simplify prescription regimens</li>
<li>The role of positive contagion in golf performance</li>
</ul>
<p>To subscribe to this research review, go to: <a href="http://www.researchreview.co.nz/" target="_blank">http://www.researchreview.co.nz/</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-07-30 11:50:36.186</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: A narrative review (U.S.)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/33508/cognitive-interventions-to-reduce-diagnostic/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/33508/cognitive-interventions-to-reduce-diagnostic/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Errors in clinical reasoning occur in most cases in which the diagnosis is missed, delayed or wrong. The goal of this narrative review, published in <em>BMJ Quality &amp; Safety</em>, &nbsp;was to identify interventions that might reduce the likelihood of these cognitive errors.</span></p>
<p><span>The authors <span>identified "... a wide range of possible approaches to reduce cognitive errors in diagnosis. Not all the suggestions have been tested, and of those that have, the evaluations typically involved trainees in artificial settings, making it difficult to extrapolate the results to actual practice".</span></span></p>
<p><span><span><span>To read the full abstract and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;<a href="http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/21/7/535.abstract">http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/21/7/535.abstract</a></span><span>&nbsp;or contact your local or organisational library for assistance.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span>Graber, M.L., et al. (2012).&nbsp;Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: A narrative review. <em>BMJ Quality &amp; Safety,&nbsp;</em><span class="slug-vol"><em>21</em><span class="cit-sep cit-sep-after-article-vol">:</span></span><span class="slug-pages">535-557&nbsp;</span><span class="slug-doi" title="10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000149">doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000149</span></span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-06-20 09:18:24.854</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Great expectations: Use of molecular tests and computerised prognostic tools in New Zealand cancer care</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/32182/great-expectations-use-of-molecular-tests/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/32182/great-expectations-use-of-molecular-tests/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-04-20 15:06:52.68</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Primary Care Decision Support Software - Overview of the main products and vendors</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31992/primary-care-decision-support-software-overview/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31992/primary-care-decision-support-software-overview/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Following requests for further information about the different products that are available to support practices, we contacted each of the main vendors (<em>BestPractice, Healthstat, My Practice, Patient Dashboard, and Dr Info</em>) and invited them to provide an overview of their products in response to the following eight questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>Please provide a general description of the product: </li>
<li>Who&nbsp;should I contact for more info?</li>
<li>Indication of cost range and cost structure: </li>
<li>Once purchased, what's the process for implementing the product in our system? Is this included in the cost? </li>
<li>Is user-training available? What are the arrangements?&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</li>
<li>What product support is available after purchase? Is there a helpdesk etc? </li>
<li>Which of the main vendor products is this compatible with? </li>
</ul>
<p>Below are responses from the vendors for each of the products.</p>
<p>If you need any further information, please contact the relevant vendor directly - you'll find their contact details in their responses. &nbsp;</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-04-13 12:54:27.239</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Use of clinical decision support tools in the management of colorectal cancer</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31983/use-of-clinical-decision-support-tools-in/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31983/use-of-clinical-decision-support-tools-in/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-04-13 09:46:20.816</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Experiential and rational decision making: A survey to determine how emergency physicians make clinical decisions (Canada)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31961/experiential-and-rational-decision-making/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31961/experiential-and-rational-decision-making/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Dual-process psychological theories argue that clinical decision making is achieved through a combination of experiential                                     (fast and intuitive) and rational (slower and systematic) cognitive processes.</p>
<p>The aim of this study was to determine whether emergency physicians perceived their clinical decisions in general to be more experiential or rational                                     and how this compared with other physicians.</p>
<p>A validated psychometric tool, the Rational Experiential Inventory was sent to all emergency                                     physicians registered with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. After analysis of these survey results the authors concluded that o<strong></strong>verall, emergency physicians favoured  rational decision making rather than experiential decision making;  however, female                                     emergency physicians had higher  experiential scores than male emergency physicians. This has important  implications for future                                     knowledge translation and decision  support efforts among emergency physicians.</p>
<p>Calder, Lisa A. et al. (2011). Experiential and rational decision making: a survey to determine how emergency physicians make clinical decisions. <em>Emergency Medicine Journal</em>, [Epublished 7 November 2011].</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to: <a href="http://emj.bmj.com/content/early/2011/11/07/emermed-2011-200468.abstract" target="_blank">http://emj.bmj.com/content/early/2011/11/07/emermed-2011-200468.abstract</a> or contact your local or organisational library for assistance.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-04-12 11:14:03.006</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>PB9 Development of a critical appraisal tool for emergency department quality indicators</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31902/pb9development-of-a-critical-appraisal-tool/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31902/pb9development-of-a-critical-appraisal-tool/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-04-11 10:15:55.094</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The role of ICT in supporting disruptive innovation: A multi-site qualitative study of Nurse Practitioners in Emergency Departments (Australia)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31854/the-role-of-ict-in-supporting-disruptive/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31854/the-role-of-ict-in-supporting-disruptive/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The disruptive potential of the Nurse Practitioner is evident in their ability    to offer services traditionally provided by primary care practitioners and their provision    of a health promotion model of care in response to changing health trends.</p>
<p>This study aimed to investigate ways in which Nurse Practitioners have incorporated the use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) as a mechanism to support their new clinical role    within Emergency Departments.</p>
<p>A cross-sectional qualitative study was undertaken in the Emergency Departments of two large Australian metropolitan public teaching hospitals. Semi-structured, in-depth    interviews were conducted with five nurse practitioners, four senior physicians and    five senior nurses.</p>
<p style="line-height:160%">The results of the study found that the role of the Emergency Nurse Practitioner was distinguished from those of Emergency nurses and physicians    by two elements: advanced practice and holistic care, respectively. ICT supported    the advanced practice dimension of the Nurse Practitioner role in two ways: availability and completeness    of electronic patient information enhanced timeliness and quality of diagnostic and    therapeutic decision-making, expediting patient access to appropriate care. The ubiquity    of patient data sourced from a central database supported and improved quality of    communication between health professionals within and across sites, with wider diffusion    of the Electronic Medical Record holding the potential to further facilitate team-based,    holistic care.</p>
<p style="line-height:160%">Li, J. et al. (2012). The role of ICT in supporting disruptive innovation: A multi-site qualitative study of Nurse Practitioners in Emergency Departments, <em>BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making</em>, 12:27.</p>
<p style="line-height:160%">Access to the full text of the article is free online at, <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/12/27/abstract" target="_blank">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/12/27/abstract</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-04-05 09:47:40.491</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>The use of decision technologies in health (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31302/the-use-of-decision-technologies-in-health/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31302/the-use-of-decision-technologies-in-health/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>In a recent Nuffield Trust (UK) seminar series the use of decision technologies in health to help patients, clinicians, managers and commissioners make more informed decisions were examined. Two audio slideshows provide an introduction to decision technologies (first link below); and highlight some innovative uses of decision technologies from the US and UK (second link below).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/talks/introduction-use-decision-technologies-health-care" target="_blank">http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/talks/introduction-use-decision-technologies-health-care</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/talks/innovation-use-decision-technologies-health-care" target="_blank">http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/talks/innovation-use-decision-technologies-health-care</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-02-29 16:45:48.793</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A clinical pathway tool for NZ: Initial feasibility study. Final report</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31220/a-clinical-pathway-tool-for-nz-initial-feasibility/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31220/a-clinical-pathway-tool-for-nz-initial-feasibility/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-02-24 13:40:49.338</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Development and validation of a dispatcher identification algorithm for stroke emergencies (Germany)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31059/development-and-validation-of-a-dispatcher/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31059/development-and-validation-of-a-dispatcher/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<div id="sec-1">
<p id="p-5">Recent  innovations such as CT installation in ambulances may lead to earlier  start of stroke-specific treatments. However,                            such technically complex mobile facilities  require effective methods of correctly identifying patients before  deployment. This research aimed to develop and validate a new  dispatcher identification algorithm for stroke emergencies.<strong> </strong>The dispatcher  identification algorithm for stroke emergencies was informed by  systematic qualitative analysis of the content                            of emergency calls to ambulance dispatchers  for patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack and other  neurological and nonneurological diseases. After training of dispatchers, sensitivity and predictive  values were                            determined prospectively in patients admitted  to hospital by using the discharge diagnosis as the reference  standard. Analysis indicated that, using a&nbsp; dispatcher identification algorithm for stroke emergencies, more than  half of all patients with stroke admitted by ambulance                            were correctly identified by dispatchers.  Most false-positive stroke codes had other neurological diagnoses.</p>
<p>Krebes, S., et al. (2012). Development and validation of a dispatcher identification algorithm for stroke emergencies. <em>Stroke</em>, 43, 776-781.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to: <a href="http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/43/3/776.abstract" target="_blank">http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/43/3/776.abstract</a> or contact your local or organisational library for assistance.</p>
</div>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-02-20 12:57:08.598</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Nurses&#039; perceptions of an electronic patient record from a patient safety perspective: A qualitative study (Sweden)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31019/nurses-perceptions-of-an-electronic-patient/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31019/nurses-perceptions-of-an-electronic-patient/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This small-scale qualitative study from Sweden explores nurses' perceptions of using an electronic patient record in everyday practice, in general ward settings. The findings related to patient safety were clustered in one main category: 'documentation in everyday practise'. Nurses reported that the electronic patient record did not support nursing practice when documenting crucial patient information, such as vital signs.<strong>&ensp;</strong> The authors conclude that efforts should be made to include the views of nurses when designing an electronic patient record to ensure it suits the needs of nursing practice and supports patient safety. Essential patient information needs to be easily accessible and give support for decision-making.</p>
<p>Stevenson, J. E., &amp; Nilsson, G. (2012). Nurses' perceptions of an electronic patient record from a patient safety perspective: A qualitative study. <em>Journal of Advanced Nursing</em>, 68 (3), 667-676.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to: <a href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bsc/jan/2012/00000068/00000003/art00018" target="_blank">http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bsc/jan/2012/00000068/00000003/art00018</a> or contact your local or organisational library for assistance.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-02-17 10:14:09.505</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Prescribing history to identify candidates for chronic condition medication adherence promotion</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31008/prescribing-history-to-identify-candidates/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/31008/prescribing-history-to-identify-candidates/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-02-16 13:37:41.133</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Prediction models for the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/30828/prediction-models-for-the-risk-of-cardiovascular/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/30828/prediction-models-for-the-risk-of-cardiovascular/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This study reviewed the primary prevention studies that focused on the development, validation and impact assessment of a cardiovascular risk model, scores or rules that can be applied to patients with type 2 diabetes.</p>
<p>The authors conclude that "many cardiovascular risk scores are available that can be applied to patients with type 2 diabetes. A minority of these risk scores has been validated and tested for its predictive accuracy, with only a few showing a discriminative value of &ge;0.80. The impact of applying these risk scores in clinical practice is almost completely unknown, but their use is recommended in various national guidelines".</p>
<p>van Dieren, S., et al. (2012). Prediction models for the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.<em> Heart, 98</em>, 360-369.</p>
<p><span style="color: #334444; font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; background-color: #ffffff;">To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to: <a href="http://heart.bmj.com/content/98/5/360.abstract">http://heart.bmj.com/content/98/5/360.abstract</a></span><span style="color: #334444; font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; background-color: #ffffff;">&nbsp;or contact your local or organisational library for assistance.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-02-08 11:40:18.195</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>A ‘whole of system’ approach to compare options for CVD interventions in Counties Manukau</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/30669/a-whole-of-system-approach-to-compare-options/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/30669/a-whole-of-system-approach-to-compare-options/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-01-30 12:30:28.565</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Systematic review and evaluation of web-accessible tools for management of diabetes and related cardiovascular risk factors by patients and healthcare providers</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/30665/systematic-review-and-evaluation-of-web-accessible/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/30665/systematic-review-and-evaluation-of-web-accessible/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>This systematic review identifies and evaluates the effectiveness, clinical usefulness, sustainability, and usability of web-compatible diabetes-related tools.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Fifty-seven studies met inclusion criteria (40 experimental designs; 17 observational designs). Methodological quality and ratings for clinical usefulness and sustainability were variable, and there was a high prevalence of usability errors. Tools showed moderate but inconsistent effects on a variety of outcomes including HbA1c and weight. Meta-regression of adequately reported studies found that, although the interventions studied resulted in positive outcomes, this was not moderated by clinical usefulness nor usability.</p>
<p>The authors note that the review is limited by the number of accessible tools, exclusion of tools for mobile devices, study quality, and the use of non-validated scales. They conclude that few tools&nbsp;met their criteria for effectiveness, usefulness, sustainability, and usability.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Yu, C., et al. (2012). Systematic review and evaluation of web-accessible tools for management of diabetes and related cardiovascular risk factors by patients and healthcare providers. <em>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA),&nbsp;19:</em>514-522.</p>
<p>This is an open access article and is available in full text at:&nbsp;<a href="http://jamia.bmj.com/content/19/4/514.full">http://jamia.bmj.com/content/19/4/514.full</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-01-30 12:09:53.572</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: Are the criteria proposed by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups cost-effective?</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/30578/screening-for-gestational-diabetes-mellitus/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/30578/screening-for-gestational-diabetes-mellitus/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<div id="sec-1">
<p id="p-5">The  International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG)  recently recommended new criteria for diagnosing                         gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study  was undertaken to determine whether adopting the IADPSG criteria would  be                         cost-effective, compared with the current  standard of care. The authors developed a decision analysis model comparing the cost-utility of three strategies to identify GDM: <em>1</em>) no screening, <em>2</em>) current screening practice, or <em>3</em>) screening practice proposed by the IADPSG. Assumptions included that <em>1</em>) women diagnosed with GDM received additional prenatal monitoring, mitigating the risks of preeclampsia, shoulder dystocia,                         and birth injury; and <em>2</em>) GDM women had opportunity for intensive post-delivery counseling and behaviour modification to reduce future diabetes risks.                         The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Analysis found that the IADPSG  recommendation for glucose screening in pregnancy is cost-effective.  The model is most sensitive to the likelihood                         of preventing future diabetes in patients  identified with GDM using postdelivery counseling and intervention.</p>
</div>
<div id="sec-4">
<p>Werner, E. F., et al. (2012). Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus:  Are the criteria proposed by the International Association of Diabetes  and Pregnancy                   Study Groups cost-effective? <em>Diabetes Care</em>, <span>35 (3), 529-535<span title="10.2337/dc11-1643">.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span title="10.2337/dc11-1643">To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to:&nbsp;</span></span><a href="http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/early/2012/01/13/dc11-1643.abstract" target="_blank">http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/35/3/529.abstract</a> or contact your local or organisational library for assistance.</p>
</div>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2012-01-23 16:30:09.693</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>NICE Guidance (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/30177/nice-guidance-uk/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/30177/nice-guidance-uk/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (<span>NICE</span>) provides guidance, sets quality standards and manages a national database to improve people&rsquo;s health and prevent and treat ill health. NICE guidance is:</p>
<ul>
<li>designed to promote good health and prevent ill health</li>
<li>produced by the people affected by our work, including health and social care professionals, patients and the public</li>
<li>based on the best evidence</li>
<li>transparent in its development, consistent, reliable and based on a rigorous development process</li>
<li>good value for money, weighing up the cost and benefits of treatments</li>
<li>internationally recognised for its excellence.</li>
</ul>
<p>This website lists all forthcoming NICE guidance, including guidance on breast cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, diabetes (type 2), hepatitis C, lung cancer, melanoma, lymphoma, smoking cessation, and chronic heart failure.</p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-12-14 11:46:31.173</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Risk models and scores for type 2 diabetes: Systematic review (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/29794/risk-models-and-scores-for-type-2-diabetes/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/29794/risk-models-and-scores-for-type-2-diabetes/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p id="p-8">Systematic review evaluating current risk models and scores for type 2 diabetes to help inform the selection and implementation of these in practice.</p>
<p>In total,<strong></strong> 8864 titles were scanned, 115 full text papers considered, and 43  papers included in the final sample. These described the prospective  development or validation, or both, of 145 risk prediction models and  scores, 94 of which were studied in detail. The models had been tested on  6.88 million participants followed for up to 28 years. Some but not all risk models  or scores had robust statistical properties and had been externally validated on a  different population. Genetic markers added nothing to models over  clinical and sociodemographic factors.</p>
<p>Most authors described their  score as &ldquo;simple&rdquo; or &ldquo;easily implemented,&rdquo; although few were specific  about the intended users and under what circumstances. Ten mechanisms  were identified by which measuring diabetes risk might improve outcomes.  Follow-on studies that applied a risk score as part of an intervention  aimed at reducing actual risk in people were sparse. The authors conclude that, although much work has been done to develop diabetes risk models and scores, most are rarely used because they require tests not routinely available  or they were developed without a specific user or clear use in mind. Recent research has begun to tackle usability and the  impact of diabetes risk scores. Two promising areas for further research  are interventions that prompt lay people to check their own diabetes  risk and use of risk scores on population datasets to identify high risk  &ldquo;hotspots&rdquo; for targeted public health interventions.</p>
<p>Noble, D., et al. (2011). Risk models and scores for type 2 diabetes: Systematic review. <em>BMJ</em>, 343, bmj.d7163.<cite></cite><cite><span><em></em></span></cite></p>
<p><span>To read the full abstract, and for access to a free full text version of the article, go to: </span><a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d7163?tab=full">http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d7163?tab=full</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-11-29 13:55:04.385</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Team situation awareness and the anticipation of patient progress during ICU rounds (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/29618/team-situation-awareness-and-the-anticipation/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/29618/team-situation-awareness-and-the-anticipation/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<div id="sec-1">
<p id="p-3">The ability of medical teams to develop and maintain team situation awareness (team SA) is crucial for patient safety. Limited research has investigated team SA within clinical environments. This study reports the development of a method for investigating team SA during the intensive care unit (ICU) round and describes the results.</p>
<p>In one ICU, a sample of doctors and nurses (n=44, who combined to form 37 different teams) were observed during 34 morning ward rounds. Following the clinical review of each patient (n=105), team members individually recorded their anticipations for expected patient developments over 48&nbsp;h. Patient-outcome data were collected to determine the accuracy of anticipations. For over half of the patients, ICU team members formed conflicting anticipations as to whether patients would deteriorate within 48&nbsp;h. Senior doctors were most accurate in their predictions. Exploratory analysis found that team processes did not predict team SA. However, the involvement of junior and senior trainee doctors in the patient decision-making process predicted the extent to which those team members formed team SA with senior doctors.</p>
<p>Reader, T. W., et al. (2011). Team situation awareness and the anticipation of patient progress during ICU rounds. <em>BMJ Quality and Safety</em>, 20 (12), doi:10.1136/bmjqs.2010.048561.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract, and for information on how to access the full text, go to: <a href="http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/20/12/1035.short?rss=1">http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/20/12/1035.short?rss=1</a> or contact your local or organisational library for assistance.</p>
</div>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-11-24 11:46:59.773</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Health technology prioritisation: Which criteria for prioritising new technologies, and what are their relative weights?</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/28030/health-technology-prioritisation-which-criteria/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/28030/health-technology-prioritisation-which-criteria/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-09-01 13:30:17.011</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Clinical practice guidelines&#039; development and use in New Zealand: An evolving process</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26952/clinical-practice-guidelines-development/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26952/clinical-practice-guidelines-development/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-07-07 15:14:49.311</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Shared decision making coding systems: How do they compare in the oncology context?</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26409/shared-decision-making-coding-systems-how/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26409/shared-decision-making-coding-systems-how/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-06-22 15:17:46.064</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Prioritization of radiotherapy in Australia and New Zealand</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26365/prioritization-of-radiotherapy-in-australia/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26365/prioritization-of-radiotherapy-in-australia/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-06-22 10:29:57.971</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Evaluation of a decision-making aid for parents regarding childhood immunizations</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26250/evaluation-of-a-decision-making-aid-for-parents/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26250/evaluation-of-a-decision-making-aid-for-parents/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-06-19 14:52:29.962</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Understanding and predicting parental decisions about early childhood immunizations</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26242/understanding-and-predicting-parental-decisions/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26242/understanding-and-predicting-parental-decisions/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-06-19 09:24:38.974</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Why do parents choose not to immunise their children?</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26221/why-do-parents-choose-not-to-immunise-their/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26221/why-do-parents-choose-not-to-immunise-their/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-06-17 14:51:36.286</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Supporting pregnant women to quit smoking: Postal survey of New Zealand general practitioners and midwives&#039; smoking cessation knowledge and practices</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26035/supporting-pregnant-women-to-quit-smoking/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/26035/supporting-pregnant-women-to-quit-smoking/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-06-14 10:52:47.698</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>New online tool brings all related NICE guidance together for first time (UK)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/25269/new-online-tool-brings-all-related-nice-guidance/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/25269/new-online-tool-brings-all-related-nice-guidance/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>The UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has launched NICE Pathways at its annual conference in Birmingham. NICE Pathways is an online tool for health and social care professionals which brings together all connected NICE guidance on a topic in a user-friendly electronic flowchart.</p>
<p>The 18 pathways currently covered include:&nbsp;alcohol-use disorders, anaemia management in chronic kidney disease, breast cancer, chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, depression, diabetes, diabetes in pregnancy, diet, glaucoma, neonatal jaundice, physical activity, postnatal care, smoking, stroke, and venous thromboembolism prevention.</p>
<p>For futher information, go to: <a href="http://www.nice.org.uk/newsroom/pressreleases/NICEPathwaysLaunch.jsp">http://www.nice.org.uk/newsroom/pressreleases/NICEPathwaysLaunch.jsp</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-05-13 08:17:22.805</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Developing a decision aid to guide public sector health policy decisions: A study protocol (Canada)</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/25215/developing-a-decision-aid-to-guide-public/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/25215/developing-a-decision-aid-to-guide-public/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>Decision aids have been developed in a number of health disciplines to support evidence-informed decision making. However, few studies in the literature offer decision guidance specifically to health policymakers. This study aims to facilitate the structured and systematic incorporation of research evidence, along with values and other non-research-based evidence, into the policy making process. The resulting decision aid is intended to help public sector health policy decision makers who are tasked with making evidence-informed decisions on behalf of populations.</p>
<p>To read the full abstract and for&nbsp;access to the provisional full text PDF, go to: <a href="http://www.implementationscience.com/content/6/1/46/abstract">http://www.implementationscience.com/content/6/1/46/abstract</a></p>
<p>Tso, P., et al. (2011). Developing a decision aid to guide public sector health policy decisions: A study protocol. <em>Implementation Science, 6 </em>(46), <span>doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-46.</span></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-05-11 13:05:47.581</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Impact of electronic health record clinical decision support on diabetes care</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/23488/impact-of-electronic-health-record-clinical/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/23488/impact-of-electronic-health-record-clinical/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[<p>A study, reported in the Annals of Family Medicine, assessed the impact of an electronic health<sup> </sup>record&ndash;based diabetes clinical decision support system<sup> </sup>on control of hemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> (glycated hemoglobin), blood pressure,<sup> </sup>and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in adults<sup> </sup>with diabetes.</p>
<p>The clinic-randomised trial in Minnesota included<sup> </sup>2,556 patients with diabetes. The authors concluded from the study that <strong></strong> electronic health record-based diabetes clinical decision support significantly<sup> </sup>improved glucose control and some aspects of blood pressure<sup> </sup>control in adults with type 2 diabetes.</p>
<p>O'Connor, P.J., et al. (2011). Impact of electronic health record clinical decision support on diabetes care: A randomized trial. <em>Annals of Family Medicine, 9,</em> 12-21.</p>
<p>For acess to the abstract and full-text version of this paper, go to <a href="http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/content/abstract/9/1/12" target="_blank">http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/content/abstract/9/1/12</a></p>]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-02-01 10:51:59.773</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Can general practitioners provide effective cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention? Dreams and realities of CVD prevention</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/23376/can-general-practitioners-provide-effective/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/23376/can-general-practitioners-provide-effective/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-01-25 10:58:49.157</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Diabetes outpatient care before and after admission for diabetic foot complications</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/23250/diabetes-outpatient-care-before-and-after/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/23250/diabetes-outpatient-care-before-and-after/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-01-17 12:41:06.873</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Equity of access to CVD risk management using electronic clinical decision support in the coronary care unit</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/23211/equity-of-access-to-cvd-risk-management-using/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/23211/equity-of-access-to-cvd-risk-management-using/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2011-01-17 10:14:47.731</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>An ontology-based approach to enhance querying capabilities of general practice medicine for better management of hypertension</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/22855/an-ontology-based-approach-to-enhance-querying/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/22855/an-ontology-based-approach-to-enhance-querying/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2010-12-06 13:08:20.781</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Validation of the shared decision-making model in the context of a patient presenting to the emergency department with chest pain of possible cardiac origin</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/22582/validation-of-the-shared-decision-making/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/22582/validation-of-the-shared-decision-making/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2010-11-17 11:32:14.171</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Future developments in chest pain diagnosis and management</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/22251/future-developments-in-chest-pain-diagnosis/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/22251/future-developments-in-chest-pain-diagnosis/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2010-11-02 10:22:53.666</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Alleviating the Burden of Chronic Conditions in New Zealand (The ABCC NZ Study): Generic stocktake analysis</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/21710/alleviating-the-burden-of-chronic-conditions/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/21710/alleviating-the-burden-of-chronic-conditions/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2010-10-11 13:18:31.592</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Alleviating the Burden of Chronic Conditions in New Zealand (The ABCC NZ Study): Disease specific analysis</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/21708/alleviating-the-burden-of-chronic-conditions/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/21708/alleviating-the-burden-of-chronic-conditions/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2010-10-11 12:44:11.304</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Alleviating the Burden of Chronic Conditions in New Zealand (The ABCC NZ Study): New Zealand experts’ perspectives of chronic conditions management</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/21707/alleviating-the-burden-of-chronic-conditions/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/21707/alleviating-the-burden-of-chronic-conditions/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2010-10-11 12:32:55.647</pubDate>
					</item>
				
					
					<item>
						<title>Systematic care to reduce ethnic disparities in diabetes care</title>
						<link>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/21529/systematic-care-to-reduce-ethnic-disparities/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</link>
						<guid>https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/21529/systematic-care-to-reduce-ethnic-disparities/
?tag=decisionsupportsystems&amp;tab=2612&amp;section=8959</guid>
						<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						<pubDate>2010-10-03 11:02:00.77</pubDate>
					</item>
				
			
	</channel>
</rss>
